Case law

Lawrence v. Courtyards at Deerwood Ass'n, Inc.

318 F. Supp. 2d 1133 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 11, 2004

The Association acts through an elected Board of Directors (“Board”), which typically consists of five members. The Association contracted with Miami Management, Inc. … In the course of his attempts, Fernandez sent the Board a letter declaring that the Board had been recalled and declaring himself as the new president.

United States v. MacIa

157 F. Supp. 2d 1369 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 21, 2001

Brown (“Trustee”), on March 5, 2001. … See, e.g., Fitzpatrick v. Internal Revenue Service, 665 F.2d 327, 329 (11th Cir.1982); Charter Air Center, Inc. v. Florida Public Service Commission, 503 F.Supp. 243, 244 (N.D.Fla.1980).

United States v. Marrero

644 F. Supp. 570 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 22, 1986

They were justified in boarding for that purpose. under Villamonte-Marquez, supra. See U.S. v. … Moreover, the officers were justified in making an investigatory stop and then boarding the vessel based on reasonable suspicion. See United States v. Man-beck, 744 F.2d 360 (4th Cir.1984); United States v.

Dzikowski v. Moreno (In Re V.O.C. Analytical Laboratories, Inc.)

263 B.R. 156 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 18, 2001

Brown, Inc. merged into the Debtor pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger between the Debtor and A.M. Brown, Inc. … Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242, 248 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); Allen v. Tyson Foods, 121 F.3d 642 , 646 (11th Cir.1997).

United States v. One (1) 1983 Homemade Vessel Named Barracuda

625 F. Supp. 893 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 14, 1986

This warrantless boarding and search of the Barracuda was Constitutional because it was conducted pursuant to consent, Schneckloth v. … See United States v. One (1) 1984 #1 Boat Mfg. Lobster Vessel Known as M/V Sea Power, 617 F.Supp. 672, 679 (S.D.Fla.1985).

The Coldwater

283 F. 146 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 9, 1922

See Ingram Day Lumber Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation (D. C.) 267 Fed. 283 . … In the case of Belknap v. Schild, 161 U. S. 10 , on pages, 16, 17, 16 Sup. Ct. 443, on page 444 ( 40 L.

United States v. Greenpeace, Inc.

314 F. Supp. 2d 1252 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 15, 2004

See Lewis v. … First, it involves a statute which—aside from the charges against the individual Greenpeace members for boarding or attempting to board the APL Jade—has been gathering dust for over a century.

Clark v. Andrew

4 F.2d 124 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 16, 1925

Ed. 955 ; Shubert v. Woodward, 167 F. 47 , 92 C. C. A. 509 ; Winston v. Brown, 247 F. 948 , 160 C. C. A. 138 . Hutchinson Gas & Fuel Company v. Wichita Natural Gas Co. (C. C. … Winston v. Brown, supra. The foregoing eases establish the general rule that specific performance will not be decreed in cases where there is a want of mutuality.

Jones v. City of Key West, Fla.

679 F. Supp. 1547 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 25, 1988

Mills v. Alabama, 384 U.S. 214, 218 , 86 S.Ct. 1434, 1437 , 16 L.Ed. 2d 484 (1966); see also Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 467 , 100 S.Ct. 2286, 2293 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980); Landmark Communications, Inc. v. … Board of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v. Jews For Jesus, Inc., — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2568, 2571 , 96 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987) (quoting Brockett v.

Branham v. Material Systems Corporation

354 F. Supp. 1048 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 31, 1973

Evans & Co. v. McAlpine, supra, 434 F.2d at 104 , quoting with approval City National Bank v. Vanderboom, supra, 422 F.2d at 230 n. 10. See also Mitchell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., supra, 446 F.2d at 103 ; Kohler v. … See Herpich v. Wallace, supra, 430 F.2d at 806; Rekant v. Desser, 425 F.2d 872, 877 (5th Cir. 1970).

Steward v. AirTran Airways, Inc.

221 F. Supp. 2d 1307 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 15, 2002

Reed v. … Meeks v.

Williams v. The Lizzie Henderson

29 F. Cas. 1373 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 15, 1880

S.] 236; Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Philadelphia, 12 How. [53 U. S.] 299. … Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. [22 U. S.] 1; Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. [25 U. S.] 419; New York v. Miln, 11 Pet. [36 U. S.] 102; Lácense Cases, 5 How. [46 U. S.] 504.

Hermetic Seal Corporation v. Savoy Electronics, Inc.

290 F. Supp. 240 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 15, 1967

See Amphicar Corp. of America v. … Its board of directors meets and acts independently of the parent corporation’s board of directors.

GC BY AND THROUGH WS v. Coler

673 F. Supp. 1093 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 11, 1987

The Board argues that under Smith v. Robinson, 468 U.S. 992 , 104 S.Ct. 3457 , 82 L.Ed. 2d 746 (1984), a plaintiff who asserts a valid claim under the EHA is barred from also proceeding under § 504. … Board of Education of East Windsor Regional School v. Diamond, 808 F.2d 987 , 994 n. 4 (3d Cir.1986).

Eller v. Denton

143 F. Supp. 564 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 18, 1956

The Board held the allegations of public use to be irrelevant. … A suit under 35 U.S.C. § 146 will be dismissed as soon as it clearly appears that defendant is entitled to an award of priority, Sanford v. Kepner, 344 U.S. 13 , 73 S.Ct. 75 , 97 L.Ed. 12 .

Silva-Hernandez v. Swacina

827 F. Supp. 2d 1352 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 4, 2011

Servs., Inc. v. … Smith v. Russellville Production Credit Ass’n, 777 F.2d 1544, 1547-48 (11th Cir.1985) (quoting Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 301 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979)); Warshauer v.

United States v. 321 S.E. 9th Court

914 F. Supp. 522 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Dec 20, 1995

Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 164-66 , 97 S.Ct. 2221, 2225 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977); United States v. Kaiser, 893 F.2d 1300, 1303 (11th Cir.1990). … Austin v. U.S., 509 U.S. 602 , -, 113 S.Ct. 2801, 2805 , 125 L.Ed.2d 488, 496-97 (1993), quoting Browning-Ferris.

Katz v. Chevaldina

900 F. Supp. 2d 1314 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 5, 2012

Browne v. McCain, 612 F.Supp.2d 1125, 1130 (C.D.Cal.2009). … Third, the Seventh Circuit in Brown-mark emphasized that a fair use defense in which the infringing work is parody is *1317 more likely to be ripe for resolution upon a motion to dismiss than other fair uses. 682 F.3d at

Z.K. Marine, Inc. v. M/V Archigetis

808 F. Supp. 1561 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Dec 3, 1992

Brown & Root, Inc. v. M/V Peisander, 648 F.2d 415, 420 (5th Cir.1981). … Marine, Inc. v. M/V Archigetis, 776 F.Supp. 1549 (S.D.Fla.1991). 3 .

Prieto v. Metropolitan Dade County

718 F. Supp. 934 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 29, 1989

Dukes, 427 U.S. at 303 , 96 S.Ct. at 2516-17 ; accord Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307, 312 , 96 S.Ct. 2562, 2566 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520 (1976). … Monell, 436 U.S. at 691 , 98 S.Ct. at 2036 ; Brown v. City of Clewiston, 848 F.2d 1534, 1538 (11th Cir.1988); Gilmere, 774 F.2d at 1504 .