Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,340 results
1.45s
Church v. Seventeen Hundred & Twelve Dollars
5 F. Cas. 669 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 3, 1853
S.] 48, and Peisth v. Ware, 4 Cranch [8 U. S.] 347. … S.] 675; Brown v. Lull [Case No. 2.018].
Cited 3 timesPublished661 F. Supp. 2d 1289 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 14, 2009
The disclosure requirement of Giglio ensures that “ ‘the jury knows the facts that might motivate a witness in giving testimony.’ ” Brown v. Wainwright, 785 F.2d 1457, 1465 (11th Cir.1986) (quoting Smith v. … See Hall v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedOwens v. City of Fort Lauderdale
174 F. Supp. 2d 1298 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 20, 2001
See Board of County Comm’rs v. … Brown, 520 U.S. at 407-08 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 . Cf. Farmer v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCommodity Futures Trading Commission v. Sterling Trading Group, Inc.
605 F. Supp. 2d 1245 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 20, 2009
In Dunn v. … M/V Sea Lion V v. Reyes, 23 F.3d 345, 347 (11th Cir.1994) (citation omitted).
Cited 4 timesPublishedCard v. Miami-Dade County Florida
147 F. Supp. 2d 1334 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 29, 2001
See Board of County Commissioners v. … But after further reviewing Board of County Commissioners v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997), and Gold v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedAtlantis Marine Towing, Inc. v. the M/V Elizabeth
346 F. Supp. 2d 1266 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 18, 2004
Ocean Services Towing and Salvage, Inc. v. Brown, 810 F.Supp. 1258, 1262 (S.D.Fla.1993) (citations omitted). The fact that AMT likely had pecuniary motivations for rendering assistance to the Elizabeth is immaterial. … See Ocean Services Towing and Salvage, Inc. v. Brown, 810 F.Supp. 1258, 1263 (S.D.Fla.1993) (citing The New Camelia, 105 F. 637, 640-41 (5th Cir.1900)).
Cited 3 timesPublishedMaldonado v. FIRST LIBERTY INS. CORP.
546 F. Supp. 2d 1347 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 22, 2008
See Burton v. … See Caldwell v.
Cited 5 timesPublished357 F. Supp. 713 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 17, 1973
Brown, 27 A.F.T.R.2d 70 -522 (W.D.Tex.1970), aff’d per curiam, 441 F.2d 727 (5th Cir. 1971) appeal dismissed sub nom. Rey v. United States, 405 U.S. 907 , 92 S.Ct. 948 , 30 L.Ed.2d 778 (1972), and Calvin & Co. v. … Thus, Brown is not dispositive of this lawsuit.
Cited 9 timesPublishedDoe No. 6 v. School Board of Highlands County Florida
District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 28, 2020
Weeks v. Angelone, 528 U.S. 225, 234 (2000); see also Richardson v. … Brown, 983 F.2d 201, 203 (11th Cir. 1993) (“The presumption that juries follow their instructions is necessary to any meaningful search for the reason behind a jury verdict.”).
Cited 0 timesUnknownSchreck v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance
104 F. Supp. 2d 1373 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 29, 2000
See Brown v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ala., Inc., 898 F.2d at 1563-64 ; Brown v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., 73 F.Supp.2d at 1319 ; Stvartak v. Eastman Kodak Co., 945 F.Supp. 1532, 1534 (M.D.Fla.1996). … Brown v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ala., 898 F.2d at 1566 n. 11, See Olson v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedLiberty Securities Corp. v. Fetcho
114 F. Supp. 2d 1319 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 13, 2000
See Board of County Comm’rs v. L. Robert Kimball & Assoc., 860 F.2d 683, 685 (6th Cir.1988). … See Brown v. ITT Consumer Financial Corp., 211 F.3d 1217 , 1223 (11th Cir.2000); Scott v. Prudential Securities, Inc. 141 F.3d 1007, 1017 (11th Cir.1998).
Cited 6 timesPublishedRoberson v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
339 F. Supp. 2d 1337 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 29, 2003
Riccard v. Prudential Insurance Co., 307 F.3d 1277, 1288 (11th Cir.2002); Brown v. Rauscher Pierce Refsnes, Inc., 994 F.2d 775, 778 (11th Cir.1993). … Brown v. ITT Consumer Financial Corporation, 211 F.3d 1217 , 1223 (11th Cir.2000); Scott, 141 F.3d at 1014 ; Montes, 128 F.3d at 1460 ; Ainsworth v.
Cited 1 timesPublished489 F. Supp. 61 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 26, 1980
In United States v. … See United States v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedFoley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
849 F. Supp. 2d 1345 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 17, 2012
Nov. 29, 2011) (adopting the reasoning in Brown, infra, and rejecting defendant’s asserting that actual damages are necessary to state a claim under TILA for a *1351 § 1641(g) violation); Vogan v. … See Brown, 817 F.Supp.2d at 1332-37 . In reaching this conclusion, the court relied upon, amongst other reasons, (1) the Supreme Court precedent of Mourning v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedMitchell v. The School Board of Palm Beach County, Florida
District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 12, 2021
THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, Defendant. … See Thomas v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDoe No. 6 v. School Board of Highlands County Florida
District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 26, 2021
DE 84; see R.R. v. New Life Cmty. … See, e.g., Wallace v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrandt v. Steel Hector & Davis
213 B.R. 406 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 1, 1997
Ray Goode, chairman of the Credit & Loan Committee, as well as other regulatory representatives, warned the Board of Directors at a meeting on July 21, 1989 that the Company’s loan portfolio had deteriorated and that “problem … Co., Inc. v. Evans, 547 So.2d 626, 628 (Fla. 1989); Kelley v. School Bd. of Seminole County, 435 So.2d 804 (Fla. 1983). 2 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedIndependent Ass'n of Pari-Mutuel Employees v. Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'n
407 F. Supp. 855 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 18, 1976
Plaintiff counters that whether or not the Board asserts jurisdiction over an industry is irrelevant to whether this employer affects commerce. Local 384 Teamsters v. Patane, 232 F.Supp. 740 (E.D.Pa.1964). … In addition a number of state courts have asserted jurisdiction over labor disputes where the Board has declined jurisdiction. See Kempf v.
Cited 6 timesPublished72 F. Supp. 3d 1298 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Dec 9, 2014
Browning, 863 F.Supp.2d 1155, 1167 (N.D.Fla.2012) (“The vindication of constitutional rights and the enforcement of a federal statute serve the public interest almost by definition.”); A Choice For Women v. … The court permanently enjoined the Board from enforcing the regulation. The Tenth Circuit, in affirming the regulation’s unen-forceability, cited Board of Trustees, State Univ. of N.Y. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedChabad Chayil, Inc. v. The School Board of Miami-Dade County Florida
District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 22, 2021
Brown, 392 F.3d 1283, 1290 (11th Cir. 2004). … If Brown has final decision-making authority then any “unilateral decision” Steiger might make himself, is undoubtedly subject to review by Brown.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna