Case law

Hudson v. Chertoff

484 F. Supp. 2d 1275 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 23, 2007

See Armstrong v. … See, Rau v.

Stephens v. Broward Sheriff's Office

84 F. Supp. 3d 1327 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Dec 10, 2014

If the facts, construed ... in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, show that a constitutional right has been violated, another inquiry is whether the right violated was ‘clearly established.’ ” Brown v. … See, e.g., Woodruff v. City of Trussville, 434 Fed.Appx. 852 (11th Cir.2011) (per curiam) (finding the force used to be de minimis, but,omitting any discussion of the plaintiffs injuries); see also J.B. ex rel. Brown v.

Packaging Corp. International v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc.

566 F. Supp. 1480 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 18, 1983

In Black v. … App.1982) [5th DCA]); (6) the sale of real estate is not a consumer transaction (See Brown v. Gardens by the Sea South Condominium Association, 424 So.2d 181 (Fla.App. 1983) [4th DCA]).

United States v. Gorman

484 F. Supp. 529 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 8, 1980

On September 12, 1979, the defendant arrived at the Miami International Airport to board a flight to Chicago. Gorman presented himself and his luggage at a security checkpoint at Concourse H prior to boarding. … In United States v.

Director of Office of Thrift Supervision v. Lopez

141 F.R.D. 165 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 31, 1992

BROWN, United States Magistrate Judge. This cause is before this court on defendant’s motion to tax costs pursuant to an order of reference dated November 22, 1991 from the Honorable Federico A. … Inc. v. Dolman, 333 F.2d 257 (9th Cir.1964); W.F. Potts Son & Co. v. Cochrane, 59 F.2d 375 (5th Cir.1932).

Adiel v. Chase Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

630 F. Supp. 131 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 30, 1986

McCoy v. Salem Mortgage Co., 74 F.R.D. 8, 12 (E.D. Mich.1976). Relying on McCoy , the Court in Vickers v. … The court in Riggs v.

Belke v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith

78 F.R.D. 736 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 23, 1978

For example, the Supreme Court, in Couch v. … [several other federal statutory sections] . . and Regulation T912 C.F.R. 220 of the Federal Reserve Board as well as pendent claims under the common law of the state of Florida.

Jones v. Mayo

87 F. Supp. 700 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Dec 13, 1949

Jones v. State, 130 Fla. 645 , 178 So. 404 . … See Jones v. Mayo, 139 Fla. 400 , 190 So. 615 . In a concurring opinion in Jones v.

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Stahl

854 F. Supp. 1565 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 27, 1994

In Neal v. … Co. v.

Brandt v. Bassett

855 F. Supp. 353 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 3, 1994

Under the doctrine of adverse domination, a statute of limitations is tolled on an action against director/officer misconduct so long as a majority of the board is dominated by the alleged wrongdoers. See F.D.I.C. v. … The Fifth Circuit in Schilling v.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kloster Cruise Ltd.

743 F. Supp. 856 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 26, 1990

But see Bryant v. … Ward v.

L.M.

District Court, S.D. Florida · Dec 8, 2025

Corp. v. … See Brown, 155 F.

The Algic

13 F. Supp. 834 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 27, 1936

Jacksonville Forwarding Company contracted with the United States Shipping Board to dock, undock, and shift Shipping Board vessels in the port of Jacksonville for stated charges. … Baltimore & Boston Barge Co. v. Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co. (C.C.A.) 170 F. 442 .

In Re Southeast Banking Corp.

855 F. Supp. 353 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 3, 1994

Under the doctrine of adverse domination, a statute of limitations is tolled on an action against director/officer misconduct so long as a majority of the board is dominated by the alleged wrongdoers. See F.D.I.C. v. … International Insurance Co. v.

CHAMBERLAIN YACHT SALES, INC. v. PHOENIX GLOBAL EQUITY PARTNERS LIMITED, J FREUND PC, and JONATHAN FREUND

District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 28, 2026

(citing Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 895 (1984)); see also Barnes, 168 F.3d at 438 (“The significant disparity in their experience should be reflected in the rates awarded.”); Brown v. Sch. … “If the court concluded that the number of claimed hours is excessive, it may engage in ‘an across-the-board cut,’ so long as it provides adequate explanation for the decrease.” Galdames v. N & D Inv. Corp., 432 F.

Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. v. American Financial Network

414 F. Supp. 2d 1155 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 6, 2006

Brown v. ITT Consumer Financial Corp., 211 F.3d 1217 , 1223 (11th Cir.2000). The rules of notice pleading under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not apply to a motion to vacate an arbitration award. O.R. … Commercial R-50.C (Jan. 1, 2003); see also Booth v. Hume Pub.

Bernstein v. Sephora, Div. of DFS Group LP

182 F. Supp. 2d 1214 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 11, 2002

Bass v. Board of County Comm’rs, Orange County, Fla., 256 F.3d 1095 , 1103 (11th Cir.2001). … See, e.g., Burrell v. Board of Trustees of Ga.

Stiefel Laboratories, Inc. v. Galderma Laboratories, Inc.

588 F. Supp. 2d 1336 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 13, 2008

See Brown v. Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. … See, e.g., Ivax Corp. v. B.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Commercial Investment & Development Corp.

373 F. Supp. 1153 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 21, 1974

See SEC v. Arvida Corp., supra; cf. SEC v. Okin, 132 F.2d 784 (2d Cir. 1943). 69. … SEC v. Manor Nursing Centers, Inc., supra; SEC v. Keller Corporation, 323 F.2d 397 (7th Cir. 1963); SEC v. Culpepper, 270 F.2d 241 (2d Cir. 1959). 79.

Tiara Condominium Ass'n v. Marsh, USA, Inc.

991 F. Supp. 2d 1271 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 13, 2014

Tiara’s insurance program is overseen by an insurance committee, a sub-committee of the board of governors, which makes recommendations to the board. … The board accepted the committee’s recommendation and orally advised Marsh of its decision.