Case law

Gadd v. Pearson

351 F. Supp. 895 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Dec 14, 1972

The above Act prohibits a bank holding company from acquiring the assets or control of a bank without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board. … If it becomes necessary for any bank holding company to acquire the assets or control of a bank, or to otherwise come within the ambit of § 1842, then Board approval may be sought at that time.

Huber

District Court, M.D. Florida · Mar 6, 2026

Co. v. … Amwins also points to Brown v. Ashcraft Assocs. Ins. Agency, Inc. as its silver bullet. No. CV RDB-05-507, 2008 WL 11363364, at *6 (D. Md. Aug. 7, 2008).

In Re Seminole Walls & Ceilings Corp.

388 B.R. 386 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Mar 28, 2008

V. … Bd. of Educ, 816 F.2d 575 , 577 (11th Cir. 1987) (holding that, the Board of Education could not withdraw from the consent decree entered into in a Title VII action submitted for court approval merely because the Board "changed

Boczar v. Manatee Hospitals & Health Systems, Inc.

731 F. Supp. 1042 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Feb 21, 1990

Jackson v. Metro. Edison Co., 419 U.S. 345, 350 , 95 S.Ct. 449, 453 , 42 L.Ed.2d 477 (1975); Rendell-Baker v. … Id.; Lombard’s Inc. v. Prince Mfg., Inc., 753 F.2d 974, 975 (11th Cir.1985). Section 1 Claim The purpose of the Sherman Antitrust Act is to protect competition, not individual competitors. Brown Shoe Co. v.

Lowe v. STME, LLC

354 F. Supp. 3d 1311 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Feb 5, 2019

EEOC v. STME, LLC , 309 F.Supp.3d 1207 (M.D. Fla. 2018). … Nov. 28, 2012) (holding plaintiff's refusal to comply with defendant's order to resign without stating his belief that discrimination was occurring was not a protected activity); see also Brown v. Fla. Gulf Coast Univ.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. BIH Corp.

5 F. Supp. 3d 1342 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Mar 13, 2014

of directors would meet over the weekend to consider the offer; on June 28, 2008, a press release was issued stating that BIH’s board of directors, including Galo, had held a strategic meeting over the weekend regarding … SEC v. Johnson, 530 F.Supp.2d 315, 322 (D.D.C.2008) (citing Graham v. SEC, 222 F.3d 994, 1000 (D.C.Cir.2000)).

Tedder Boat Ramp System, Inc. v. Hillsborough County

54 F. Supp. 2d 1300 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Jun 23, 1999

Chrysler *1303 Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1713 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). … However, in Bateman v.

Garcia

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jan 7, 2026

Brown v. Shalala, 44 F.3d 931, 935 (11th Cir. 1995) (citations omitted). … Brown, 44 F.3d at 935; see also Graham v. Apfel, 129 F.3d 1420, 1423 (11th Cir. 1997). Mr. Garcia filed his initial application for a period of disability and DIB on April 3, 2017.

Shandong Luxi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Camphor Technologies, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida · Dec 23, 2021

See 9 U.S.C. § 5; Brown v. ITT Consumer Financial Corp., 211 F.3d 1217, 1222 (11th Cir. 2000). … Brown, 211 F.3d at 1222. See also Flagg , 644 F. App’x at 896; Inetianbor, 768 F.3d at 1351.

Campbell v. United States

325 F. Supp. 207 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Mar 3, 1971

Beck is not Board Certified by the American Board of Surgeons; that he never did any residency; that he is not a member of any medical association; that he has never performed heart surgery; that he does not perform major … Hill v.

African People's Education and Defense Fund, Inc. v. Pinellas County

District Court, M.D. Florida · Sep 30, 2024

Board of County Comm’rs v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668, 685 (1996); McClintock v. … See Kaminski v.

Grames v. Sarasota County, Florida

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jan 11, 2021

Linder v. Portocarrero, 963 F.2d 332, 334 (11th Cir. 1992); Quality Foods de Centro Am., S.A. v. Latin Am. Agribusiness Dev. Corp. … and individual Board members.

Mills

District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 1, 2026

McDonough v. Mata, 489 F. Supp. 3d 1347, 1358 (S.D. Fla. 2020) (quoting McDowell v. Brown, 392 F.3d 1283, 1289 (11th Cir. 2004)). … Brown v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 923 F.2d 1474, 1481 (11th Cir. 1991) (quotation omitted).

Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm

437 F. Supp. 75 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Aug 23, 1977

Three of the ten experiments on board the HELIOS were American. … The Court of Claims recently considered this same issue in Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States, 534 F.2d 889 , 209 Ct.Cl. 446 (1976).

Insurance Co. of North America v. M/V FRIO BRAZIL

729 F. Supp. 826 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Jan 16, 1990

The ship then loaded the cargo on board and into its holds. While being loaded, the holds were open and warm air seeped inside. … Sony Magnetic Prods., Inc. v. Merivienti O/Y, 863 F.2d 1537 , 1539 (11th Cir.1989); United States v. Lykes Bros.

Dombrowski v. Wilson

District Court, M.D. Florida · Mar 8, 2023

Brown v. Hughes, 894 F.2d 1533, 1537-38 (11th Cir. 1990). This is especially true in the case of a broken bone. See id. See also Harris v. … Brown, 894 F.2d at 1538.

Ruiz v. SharkNinja Operating LLC

District Court, M.D. Florida · Sep 14, 2023

See, e.g., Roca Labs, Inc., 2015 WL 12844308, at *3 (reducing a board-certified non-treating physician’s requested expert fee rate from $750.00 an hour to $500.00 an hour); Barnes v. … Reeves v. Kofler, 2018 Fla. Cir. LEXIS 1452 (Fla. 4th Cir. Ct. July 30, 2018).

Lloyd v. American Freedom Distillery, LLC

District Court, M.D. Florida · Aug 13, 2025

Pyzynski v. Thomas & Betts Corp., No. 6:16-cv-1998-Orl-40DCI, 2017 WL 9510591, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 16, 2017); accord Morroni v. Gunderson, 169 F.R.D. 168, 170 (M.D. … See also Carlson Corp. / Southeast v. School Board of Seminole County, Florida, 778 F. Supp. 518, 519 (M.D.

Italia

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jun 18, 2026

TAMPA DIVISION MELISSA ITALIA, Plaintiff, v. … v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344, 350 (1999). And, “[g]enerally, where service of process is insufficient, the court has no power to render judgment.”

Peeler v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval County)

District Court, M.D. Florida · Mar 27, 2023

Brown’s in-court identification of Petitioner. Ms. Brown testified that she could identify the shooter during trial based on her recollection, and she identified Petitioner. … Brown’s credibility, and Petitioner’s counsel argued as much in her closing: You heard from Michelle Brown, Ms. Brown, about 13 years old.