Case law

McIntyre v. Seminole County School Bd.

779 So. 2d 639 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 9, 2001

779 So.2d 639 (2001) Lawrence McINTYRE, Sr., Appellant, v. SEMINOLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Appellee. No. 5D00-516. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. … V.

Manatee Cty. School Bd. v. Nationsrent, Inc.

989 So. 2d 23 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 20, 2008

989 So.2d 23 (2008) MANATEE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Appellant, v. NATIONSRENT, INC., Appellee. No. 2D07-15. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. June 20, 2008. *24 James C. Valenti and Barbara W. … As the appellant, the School Board has the duty to make error clearly appear. See Lynn v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 81 So.2d 511, 513 (Fla.1955).

Rowell v. Smith

342 So. 2d 149 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 15, 1977

Brown of Brown, McDowell & Hart, Tallahassee, for appellees. SMITH, Judge. … However, under the facts of this case, even in the absence of Neale v. Aycock , the same result would be required.

Hurst v. Hampton

274 So. 2d 891 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 16, 1973

See Pottinger v. Pottinger, 1938, 133 Fla. 442 , 182 So. 762 ; Petrucci v. Petrucci, Fla.App. 1971, 252 So.2d 867 ; Boyle v. Boyle, Fla.App. 1967, 194 So.2d 64 ; Morrison v. Morrison, Fla.App. 1960, 122 So.2d 199 . … See Brown v. Brown, Fla.App. 1959, 108 So.2d 492 ; Mason v. Mason, 1934, 148 Or. 34 , 34 P.2d 328 . See also Warrick v. Hender, Fla.App. 1967, 198 So.2d 348 ; Annot. 2 A.L.R.2d 831 (1948).

Davis v. School Bd. of Gadsden County

646 So. 2d 766 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 7, 1994

The School Board's reliance on Chase v. Pinellas County School Board, 597 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) is misplaced. … Werthman v. School Board of Seminole County, 599 So.2d 220 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). But cf. Doyal v. School Board of Liberty County, 415 So.2d 791 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Russo v. Lake Buena Vista Communities, Inc.

721 So. 2d 772 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 20, 1998

Using his prosthesis, Russo boarded a tram and then walked to the ticket transportation center, where he understood he would be able to rent the electric scooter. … United States v. Brown, 79 F.3d 1550, 1562 (11th Cir.1996) (quoting John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism 60 (O. Piest, ed., Bobbs-Merrill 1957) (1861)). AFFIRMED. HARRIS, J., concurs. DAUKSCH, J., dissents, without opinion.

702-13 Holdings, LLC v. Miami-Dade Cnty. Bd. of Rules & Appeals

257 So. 3d 998 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 20, 2018

Lee v. State

368 So. 2d 395 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 27, 1979

See also, e.g., Jimenez v. State, 158 Fla. 719 , 30 So.2d 292 (1947); Brown v. State, 31 Fla. 207 , 12 So. 640 (1893); Coppolino v. … As such, it falls within category (3) of the situations outlined in Brown v.

Pfleger v. Pfleger

558 So. 2d 198 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 21, 1990

PFLEGER, Appellant, v. Cresula S. PFLEGER, Appellee. No. 89-00897. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. March 21, 1990. Anthony P. Prieto, Tampa, for appellant. Glenn E. Brown of Glenn E. … Turner v. Turner, 529 So.2d 1138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

Hirt v. POLK CTY. BD. OF COUNTY COM'RS

578 So. 2d 415 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 17, 1991

HIRT, Petitioner, v. POLK COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and Jack M. Watkins, Sr., Respondents. Nos. 90-03173, 90-03318. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. April 17, 1991. Curtis J. … See Flowers Baking Co. v. City of Melbourne, 537 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 545 So.2d 1366 (Fla. 1989); Town of Indialantic v. Nance .

State v. Kendrick

596 So. 2d 1153 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 27, 1992

In Burdick v. … See also State v. Washington, 594 So.2d 291 (Fla. 1992); State v. Eason, 592 So.2d 676 (Fla. 1992). Brown and Burdick do not control here where the operative phrases are "shall sentence" and "for a term of years".

Jones v. State

348 So. 2d 942 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 17, 1977

Couch v. State, 341 So.2d 285 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Brown v. State, 338 So.2d 573 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). … Crum v. State, 286 So.2d 268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); Brown v. State, supra .

Mistretta v. Mistretta

566 So. 2d 836 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 23, 1990

Wife cites Brown v. Ripley, 119 So.2d 712 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960), as authority for allowing the non-appointment to be raised for the first time on appeal. … The minor in Brown was not only the defendant but also the alleged father, and, because the minor was the defendant, Brown is clearly distinguishable from the instant case.

Cone v. State, Dept. of Health

886 So. 2d 1007 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 28, 2004

V. Whether the Board considered the mitigation submitted by appellant prior to the decision to revoke his license to practice osteopathic medicine. … See Gretz v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 572 So.2d 1384, 1386 (Fla.1991); Adams v.

Patterson v. BROWNING'S PHARMACY

961 So. 2d 982 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 22, 2007

961 So.2d 982 (2007) Angela V. PATTERSON, Appellant, v. BROWNING'S PHARMACY & HEALTHCARE, INC., Appellee. No. 5D06-1572. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. June 22, 2007. … In this case, Browning's violated the FMLA by failing to explain FMLA benefits and leave rights to Mrs. Patterson when she requested leave. See Dodgens v. Kent Mfg. Co., 955 F.Supp. 560 (D.S.C. 1997).

Jones v. State

708 So. 2d 337 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 8, 1998

State, 687 So.2d 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), and Brown v. State, 670 So.2d 1113 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). The public defender responded that these cases were distinguishable from the facts of the present case. … In both Leslie and Brown , the conviction and sentence were entered prior to the changes in rule 9.140(b)(2)(B).

Chappell v. State

457 So. 2d 1133 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 16, 1984

Brown v. State, 428 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1983); Wale v. State, 397 So.2d 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Where premises are jointly occupied, evidence of mere occupancy is not enough to prove elements (1) and (2). Frank v. … See, P.L.R. v. State, 455 So.2d 363 (Fla. 1984). We hold, therefore, that Brown does not apply because the contraband in this case was not in plain view.

State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Dees v. Petro

765 So. 2d 792 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 1, 2000

v. … Brown, 108 So.2d 492 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959).

Smith v. State

114 So. 2d 363 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 28, 1959

Brown v. State, 130 Fla. 479 , 178 So. 153 .” … In view of the fact that the Brown case does not support the appellant’s contention, and Blackburn v.

Banta v. Rosier

399 So. 2d 444 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 3, 1981

Brown and Raymond A. Haas of Haas, Boehm, Brown & Rigdon, P.A., Daytona Beach, for appellants. Elsie T. Apthorp and David C. Chafin, Orlando, for appellee County of Volusia. Alfred A. … See also City of Tamarac v. Garchar, 398 So.2d 889 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Payne v. Palm Beach County, 395 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); A.L. Lewis Elementary School v.