Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.69s

  • State v. Hart

    632 So. 2d 134 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 9, 1994

    In Smith v. Brown, 525 So.2d 868 (Fla. 1988), the trial court granted the defendant's motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence. … GLICKSTEIN and FARMER, JJ., and BROWN, LUCY, Associate Judge, concur.

    Abrogated on other grounds by Santiago v. State, 874 So. 2d 617 (2004)Cited 18 timesPublished
  • White v. State

    122 So. 2d 340 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 3, 1960

    In State v. … In Febre v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Von Stephens v. School Bd. of Sarasota County

    338 So. 2d 890 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 29, 1976

    City of Tampa, supra ; Solomon v. Sanitarians' Registration Board, Fla. 1963, 155 So.2d 353 . In Board of Public Instruction of Dade County v. … Barker, 1935, 118 Fla. 380 , 160 So. 362 , and Board of Public Instruction for St. Lucie County v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brewer v. State

    13 Fla. L. Weekly 2173 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 16, 1988

    See Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Brown v. State, 506 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 515 So.2d 229 (Fla.1987). … See Jenkins; Brown. We also agree that the trial court’s ten special conditions of probation were improperly imposed. See Bentley v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES v. VALERIEMARIE MOORE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED

    District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 30, 2022

    v. … In Zainulabeddin v. University of South Florida Board of Trustees, No. 8:16-cv-637-T-30TGW, 2016 WL 1451726 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 13, 2016), the court denied USF's motion to dismiss based on 2 Ms.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pettibone v. State

    160 So. 2d 126 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 10, 1963

    Harmon v. State, 48 Fla. 44 , 37 So. 520 . See also recent dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Brown in the case of Andrews v. State ([99] Fla. [1350]) 126 So. 751 .” … Justice Brown.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Day v. Moore

    785 So. 2d 699 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 21, 2001

    DAY, Petitioner, v. Michael W. MOORE, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and the Florida Parole Commission, Respondents. No. 1D00-4950. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. May 21, 2001. … See, e.g., Brown v. Florida Parole Commission, 763 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). WEBSTER, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Chalifoux v. Sanchez

    991 So. 2d 432 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 26, 2008

    CHALIFOUX, Jr., Appellant, v. … Brown and Erin J. O'Leary of Brown, Garganese, Weiss & D'Agresta, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant. Harry O. Thomas, Christopher B. Lunny, and Toni A. Egan of Radey, Thomas, Yon & Clark, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellees.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Roberts v. State

    732 So. 2d 1127 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 24, 1999

    See Brown v. State, 595 So.2d 270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (finding that the absence of a traffic offense does not establish the absence of a valid objective basis for the stop); State v. … See also Bailey v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • K.J. v. State

    557 So. 2d 134 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 13, 1990

    In this case the juvenile was observed in actual possession of a large brown paper bag in which was found five little brown paper bags which in turn contained several manila envelopes bearing a total amount of 29.8 grams … See Evans v. State, 368 So.2d 58 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) (inference that marijuana was not for personal use but rather for resale arises from the way it was packaged); K. M. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lawnwood Medical Center, Inc. v. Desai

    54 So. 3d 1027 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 26, 2011

    See, e.g., Feldman v. … The doctor also argues that the statutory immunity does not apply because the Board’s decision was not supported by “good cause” or “valid reasons,” citing Lawnwood Medical Center, Inc. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hall v. State

    767 So. 2d 560 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 30, 2000

    In Brown v. … NOTES [1] The defendant in Brown v.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Pena v. The Board of Trustees of the Pension Fund for the Firefighters and Police Officers in the City of Tampa

    148 So. 3d 114 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 20, 2014

    Pena informs us that the Trustees took the position in Board of Trustees of City Pension Fund for Firefighters & Police Officers in Tampa v. … Blumberg v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 790 So. 2d 1061, 1066 (Fla. 2001). And, as even Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Manatee Cty. School Bd. v. Nationsrent, Inc.

    989 So. 2d 23 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 20, 2008

    989 So.2d 23 (2008) MANATEE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Appellant, v. NATIONSRENT, INC., Appellee. No. 2D07-15. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. June 20, 2008. *24 James C. Valenti and Barbara W. … As the appellant, the School Board has the duty to make error clearly appear. See Lynn v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 81 So.2d 511, 513 (Fla.1955).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Pinellas Career Services Ass'n v. Public Employees Relations Commission

    403 So. 2d 528 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 2, 1981

    School Board of Palm Beach County vs. PERC, 374 So.2d 527 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Chief Judge, and JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hurst v. Hampton

    274 So. 2d 891 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 16, 1973

    See Pottinger v. Pottinger, 1938, 133 Fla. 442 , 182 So. 762 ; Petrucci v. Petrucci, Fla.App. 1971, 252 So.2d 867 ; Boyle v. Boyle, Fla.App. 1967, 194 So.2d 64 ; Morrison v. Morrison, Fla.App. 1960, 122 So.2d 199 . … See Brown v. Brown, Fla.App. 1959, 108 So.2d 492 ; Mason v. Mason, 1934, 148 Or. 34 , 34 P.2d 328 . See also Warrick v. Hender, Fla.App. 1967, 198 So.2d 348 ; Annot. 2 A.L.R.2d 831 (1948).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Davis v. School Bd. of Gadsden County

    646 So. 2d 766 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 7, 1994

    The School Board's reliance on Chase v. Pinellas County School Board, 597 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) is misplaced. … Werthman v. School Board of Seminole County, 599 So.2d 220 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). But cf. Doyal v. School Board of Liberty County, 415 So.2d 791 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Courtney v. State

    10 Fla. L. Weekly 2312 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 9, 1985

    Rowe v. State, 128 Fla. 394 , 174 So. 820 (1937). We reject the State’s harmless error argument since Richards provided the only eyewitness testimony against the defendant. … In the instance of the impeachment witness Brown, since Richards admitted he told Brown to tell anyone who asked that he saw nothing, a statement to that effect by Brown at trial (as was proffered) would not be impeachment

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hirt v. POLK CTY. BD. OF COUNTY COM'RS

    578 So. 2d 415 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 17, 1991

    HIRT, Petitioner, v. POLK COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and Jack M. Watkins, Sr., Respondents. Nos. 90-03173, 90-03318. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. April 17, 1991. Curtis J. … See Flowers Baking Co. v. City of Melbourne, 537 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 545 So.2d 1366 (Fla. 1989); Town of Indialantic v. Nance .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Manley v. State

    705 So. 2d 691 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 30, 1998

    Hildwin v. Dugger, 654 So.2d 107 (Fla.1995). See also Gorham v. State, 597 So.2d 782 (Fla.1992). … Thus, Brown’s testimony would have been repetitive. Valle v. State, 22 Fla. L. Weekly S751 (Fla. Dec. 11, 1997); Card v. State, 497 So.2d 1169 (Fla.1986).

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.