Case law

Hollis v. School Bd. of Leon County

384 So. 2d 661 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 19, 1980

See Phillips v. … See District School Board of Lake County v.

Birken v. Scheer

14 Fla. L. Weekly 1149 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 10, 1989

See State v. Brown, 527 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). The appellee contends that he was entitled to the continuance because of discovery violations by the state. … See generally Granade v. Ader, 530 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Brown, 527 So.2d 209 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 534 So.2d 398 (Fla.1988); Lobik v. State, 506 So.2d 1077 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); State v.

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES v. VALERIEMARIE MOORE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 30, 2022

v. … In Zainulabeddin v. University of South Florida Board of Trustees, No. 8:16-cv-637-T-30TGW, 2016 WL 1451726 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 13, 2016), the court denied USF's motion to dismiss based on 2 Ms.

Barker v. State

259 So. 2d 200 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 17, 1972

In this respect the case differs from the recent Brown v. … Standards, id. [7] See, Section 3.3, id. [8] See, e.g., Brown v. State, n. 1, supra, p. 44. [9] See, n. 11, infra. [10] But compare, Santobello v.

Vucinich v. State

776 So. 2d 995 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 19, 2001

To support this argument, Vucinich relies on Brown v. State, 744 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1999). … Accordingly, Brown is not controlling. Vucinich also relied on Oliveira v. State, 751 So.2d 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Such reliance is misplaced. First, this court explicitly rejected the rationale of Oliveira in King v.

Watson v. Freeman Decorating Co.

455 So. 2d 1097 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 17, 1984

Brown v. Giffen Industries, Inc., 281 So.2d 897 (Fla. 1973); Milros-Sans Souci, Inc. v. Dade County, 296 So.2d 545, 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). The employer/carrier here offered no such contrary showing. … Board of County Commissioners, 79 So.2d 513 (Fla. 1955), that any claim requesting the payment of medical expenses necessarily places the burden on claimant to show a good cause excuse, if such becomes an issue. See St.

Thomas v. State

351 So. 2d 77 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 25, 1977

Under the mandate of Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377 (Fla.1968) and Rule 3.510 Fla.R.Crim.P. the jury should have been so instructed. … Terry, 336 So.2d 65 (Fla.1976)] unmistakably suggests that the Supreme Court has now returned to a strict adherence to Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377 (Fla.1968) . . . .

Peyton v. Browning

541 So. 2d 1341 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 20, 1989

Peyton, Appellants, v. Philip A. BROWNING, Jr., Appellee. No. 89-83. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. April 20, 1989. *1342 Robert T. Hyde, Jr. and Alexandra K. … See, generally, Pearce v. Doral Mobile Home Villas, Inc., 521 So.2d 282, 285 (Fla.2d DCA 1988), citing Tennant v. Charlton, 377 So.2d 1169, 1170 (Fla. 1979).

In Re Marriage of Johnson

352 So. 2d 140 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 22, 1977

Pottinger v. Pottinger, 133 Fla. 442 , 182 So. 762 (1938) and Walden v. Walden, 114 So.2d 815 (Fla.2nd DCA 1959). … (See Bergh v. Bergh, 160 So.2d 145 (Fla.1st DCA 1964); Groves v. Groves, 260 So.2d 858 (Fla.1st DCA 1972); and Brown v. Brown, 315 So.2d 15 (Fla.3rd DCA 1975).

Murphy v. Hoenigmann

525 So. 2d 1009 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 31, 1988

See Brown v. Taylor, 500 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Brown v. Vining, 334 So.2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); In re Estate of Agardy v. Dunn, 293 So.2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); McDonough v. … Rudisill, 229 So.2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969), cert. denied, 237 So.2d 532 (Fla.1970); Carberry v. Foley, 213 So.2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 222 So.2d 750 (Fla.1969). Affirmed.

Usiabulu v. Progressive Exp. Ins. Co.

992 So. 2d 373 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 8, 2008

See Brown v. Traveler's Indem. … See Martinez v. Fraxedas, 678 So.2d 489, 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Mendez v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF HEALTH

943 So. 2d 909 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 1, 2006

The Board's imposition of a penalty is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard. See Dep't of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Silva, 627 So.2d 612 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Grimberg v. … When the Board imposes a penalty within the permissible statutory range; an appellate court has no authority to review the penalty. See Fla. Real Estate Comm'n v. Webb, 367 So.2d 201, 202 (Fla.1978); see also Aldrete v.

State, Bd. of Optometry v. FLA. SOC. OF OPHTH.

538 So. 2d 878 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 10, 1989

Cf., School Board of Orange County v. Blackford, 369 So.2d 689 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). … Freedman v. State Board of Accountancy, 370 So.2d 1168, 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

Mouton v. Mouton

590 So. 2d 40 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 4, 1991

Resolving an apparent intradistrict conflict between Lee v. Lee, 309 So.2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), and Laux v. … See also Brown v. Brown, 338 So.2d 916 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

Sohacki v. Sohacki

657 So. 2d 41 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 27, 1995

Brown and Nancy Nowlis of Zisser, Robison, Brown & Nowlis, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellee. PER CURIAM. … See Zipperer v.

Taylor v. TR Properties, Inc.

603 So. 2d 1380 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 28, 1992

Four Association, Inc. v. Morris, 388 So.2d 226 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). In Brown , specific acts of consent or waiver were present in the record. … Brown, at 183.

SCHOOL BD. OF DADE CTY. v. Dade Teachers Ass'n

421 So. 2d 645 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 26, 1982

City of Clearwater v. Lewis, 404 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Pasco County School Board v. PERC, 353 So.2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). … National Labor Relations Board, 443 F.2d 52 (3rd Cir.1971); National Labor Relations Board v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, 277 F.2d 759 (5th Cir.1960); National Labor Relations Board v.

Sun Bank of Gainesville v. O'Steen Bros., Inc.

634 So. 2d 262 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 30, 1994

(O’Steen), brought an action in circuit court naming as defendants the Florida Board of Regents (BOR) and Sun Bank of Gainesville (Bank). … In support of its motion, the BOR relies principally upon Breakstone v. Baron’s of Surfside, Inc., 528 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), and Webb General Contracting, Inc. v.

Bell v. City of Sarasota

371 So. 2d 525 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 23, 1979

Where there are conflicts in the evidence presented to the board, the reviewing court will uphold the judgment of the board if it is a fairly debatable decision. See Alachua County v. … See Skaggs-Albertson's v. ABC Liquors, Inc., 363 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 1978); Board of County Commissioners v. Lowas, 348 So.2d 13 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Pena v. The Board of Trustees of the Pension Fund for the Firefighters and Police Officers in the City of Tampa

148 So. 3d 114 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 20, 2014

Pena informs us that the Trustees took the position in Board of Trustees of City Pension Fund for Firefighters & Police Officers in Tampa v. … Blumberg v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 790 So. 2d 1061, 1066 (Fla. 2001). And, as even Mr.