Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

3,253 results

1.09s

  • Walker v. McDonough

    929 So. 2d 1127 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 24, 2006

    The individual defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action, entitlement to qualified immunity, entitlement to sovereign immunity, and failure to comply with conditions precedent under section … In Wilson , our supreme court established a bright-line rule for motions to dismiss for failure to prosecute.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Citizens Property Ins. Corp. v. Calonge

    246 So. 3d 447 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 18, 2018

    The Court specifically noted: Because qualified immunity of public officials involves immunity from suit rather than a mere defense to liability, we reasoned that immunity from suit is effectively lost … qualified immunity of public officials is illusory and the very policy that animates the decision to afford such immunity is thwarted.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Shepard v. State

    65 So. 3d 1085 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 8, 2011

    This decision does not establish that the arrest was unlawful. … It established merely that the officers were not entitled to qualified immunity and that Shepard had stated a claim sufficient to survive a pretrial motion to dismiss. 1 *1087 Appellant is cautioned that the filing of frivolous

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM v. CHASE HILDERBRAND

    District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 25, 2020

    Dep't of Corr., 471 So. 2d 4, 5 (Fla. 1984) (holding that the legislature clearly intended to waive sovereign immunity in legislation authorizing the sovereign to enter into written contracts because contracts must have … Bill Stroop sued on behalf of contractors who were charged this fee, seeking a declaration that the fee violated 2There is no dispute that Lee Health qualifies for sovereign immunity

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • BROWARD COUNTY v. JOSE P. FONT

    District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 22, 2020

    It did not qualify as a residence under the terms of the ILA. … The zoning map may have set out the area over which the ILA applied, but it did not establish the basis for reimbursement.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Key West v. Florida Keys Community College

    81 So. 3d 494 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 18, 2012

    Nonetheless, after establishing the stormwater utility, the City billed the College for storm-water utility services. … Although these broad subjects are clearly related on certain levels, the statutory provisions of these Chapters are not interchangeable.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • MARY M. CAMERON, PH.D v. NICOLE A. JASTREMSKI, PH.D

    246 So. 3d 385 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 25, 2018

    We do not reach the issues of whether the complaint sufficiently states a claim for defamation or whether qualified immunity may apply. -2- Fifth District in Alfino v. … -6- appellee failed to establish a basis for dismissal on a motion to dismiss. Id.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bank of America Corp. v. Valladares

    141 So. 3d 714 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 2, 2014

    These judicial decisions dovetail with many statutes that balance the competing interests by affording individuals qualified immunity for good faith 6 mistakes when reporting … The Legislature has enacted a similar qualified immunity for mistaken reports to numerous enforcement agencies.2 We found only one authority that cuts against the trend of recognizing a qualified privilege for reporting

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ashley v. State

    772 So. 2d 42 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 28, 2000

    At the first sentencing hearing, the State proved and both Appellant and the trial court accepted that Appellant qualified as an HVFO. … However, "[t]he Constitution does not require that sentencing should be a game in which a wrong move by the judge means immunity for the prisoner." United States v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dudley v. City of Tampa

    912 So. 2d 322 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 13, 2005

    Also at this time, the Mayor's Challenge Fund was established, a central component of which was to make money available to qualified individuals who were traditionally unable to buy homes. … Because Appellants have not established that the City had a statutory or common law duty to them based on the allegations in the third amended complaint, we need not reach the issue of whether sovereign immunity insulated

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • FL GAME AND FRESHWATER COM'N v. Dockery

    676 So. 2d 471 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 11, 1996

    In an opinion which sets forth the facts of this case in greater detail, this court concluded: The record reflects that the material facts concerning the availability of the qualified immunity defense are undisputed. … Since it appears the facts and circumstances known to the public officials were such that a person of reasonable caution would believe a crime was being committed, the motion for qualified immunity summary judgment should

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Central Florida Psychological Consultants, Inc, and W. Steven Saunders v. Jon Comas

    District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 8, 2026

    “It occurs ‘only when there has been a violation of a clearly established principle . . . resulting in a miscarriage of justice.’” Id. (quoting Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanos, 843 So. 2d 885, 889 (Fla. 2003)). … Such a clearly established legal principle “can derive from a variety of legal sources, including recent controlling case law, rules of court, statutes, and constitutional law.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stack v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

    12 Fla. L. Weekly 845 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 24, 1987

    The immunity of fellow employees is, significantly, qualified, and not absolute, in the sense that it is not available to an employee who causes injury to a fellow employee by a grossly negligent act. [1] Although the court … That factual question is clearly an issue for arbitration. [2] In summary we hold that (1) the police vehicle in which the plaintiff officer was a passenger when injured was an uninsured motor vehicle within the context of

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Grable v. Hillsborough County Port Authority

    132 So. 2d 423 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 18, 1961

    It has been established that the declaratory judgment act may not be invoked unless there is a bona fide dispute between the adversaries to a cause as to a present justiciable question, and judicial declarations as to questions … a proceeding as being judicial in nature so as to bring it within the constitutional powers of the courts appear in the following excerpt: "Before any proceeding for declaratory relief should be entertained it should be clearly

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Pondella Hall for Hire, Inc. v. Lámar

    866 So. 2d 719 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 2, 2004

    Lamar alleged various grounds for dismissing Pondella's counterclaims, including: (1) prosecutorial immunity, (2) qualified immunity, (3) sovereign immunity, (4) laches, (5) insufficient pleadings and (6) statutory bars. … This pleading is insufficient to establish that the State took the leases.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Kac 2021-1, LLC, as Assignee for Johnny Smith v. American Homes 4 Rent Properties One, L L C

    District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 30, 2024

    A qualified privilege requires the plaintiff to prove express malice. Id. at 1220 (emphasis added). … The amended complaint clearly demonstrates the privilege's existence, and the amended complaint was properly dismissed at this stage in the proceedings.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Huhn v. Dixie Ins. Co.

    453 So. 2d 70 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 17, 1984

    Modlin attempted to establish a new standard for liability by applying a brightline general duty/special duty test. … a broad, but qualified, scale.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State v. Chadroff

    234 So. 2d 412 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 20, 1970

    In the caption of the waivers of immunity, it clearly stated that the defendant was voluntarily appearing. … Clearly, the defendant was not in custody, was not under compulsion, and was informed in clear, specific and unambiguous language that he was voluntarily appearing and waiving his rights to any immunity under the Constitution

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • City of Tallahassee v. Big Bend PBA

    703 So. 2d 1066 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 24, 1997

    Here, the arbitration statute clearly anticipates that, following confirmation of an award, additional judicial work (i.e., entry of a judgment) will occur. § 682.15, Fla. Stat. (1995). … Resha, 648 So.2d 1187 (Fla.1994)(in holding that "an order denying summary judgment based upon a claim of qualified immunity is subject to interlocutory review to the extent that the order turns on an issue of law," the Florida

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • University of Miami v. Exposito ex rel. Gonzales

    87 So. 3d 803 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 27, 2012

    (d) The costs of birth-related neurological injury claims are particularly high and warrant the establishment of a limited system of compensation irrespective of fault. … Because the NICA Plan provides limited remedies as a statutory substitute for common law rights and liabilities, this Court has held that the NICA statute “should be strictly construed to include *811 only those subjects clearly

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.