Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.56s
66 So. 2d 232 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jul 17, 1953
preponderates in favor of the defendant in support of his plea that he sold the dog only on an expressed warranty that the dog could run for three hours, and instead of being induced to buy the dog you find that Faircloth induced Brown … and if you find by the testimony that a three-hour dog meant only that the dog was capable and could run three hours without- weakening; and that there was no misrepresentation, your verdict would be for the defendant, Brown
Cited 0 timesPublished107 Fla. 281 · Supreme Court of Florida · Nov 21, 1932
Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna