Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdeb

602 results

2.81s

  • Rogas

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Aug 11, 2026

    Stern v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 143 F.3d 139, 145, 148 (3d Cir. 1998); Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249. 65 Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re Energy Future Holdings Corp.

    593 B.R. 217 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Oct 31, 2018

    The EFH board of directors and the EFIH board of managers (the " E-Side Boards ") approved the NextEra Merger Agreement, and on August 3, 2016, the E-Side Debtors moved this Court for an order (the " NextEra Merger Motion … See Southmark Prime Plus, L.P. v. Falzone , 776 F.Supp. 888 , 892 (D. Del. 1991).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gwynne v. Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc. (In Re Quintus Corp.)

    397 B.R. 710 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Nov 7, 2008

    See WIT Holding Corp. v. … See Harden v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. Van Brunt (In Re Grossman's, Inc.)

    389 B.R. 384 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Jun 9, 2008

    See, e.g., Rothstein v. Tenn. … In Jones v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • DiMauro v. Wilmington Trust Co. (In re DiMauro)

    548 B.R. 685 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Apr 14, 2016

    Brown, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, 4th Edition, § 107.1, at ¶6, Sec. Rev. June 7, 2004 (citations omitted). … See, e.g., TD Bank, N.A. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Elway Co. v. Miller (In Re Elrod Holdings Corp.)

    392 B.R. 110 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Aug 7, 2008

    Co. v. … Asea Brown Boveri, Inc., 313 B.R. 219, 228-29 (N.D.Ohio 2004) (stating that creditors or creditors’ committees had direct standing to bring equitable subordination claims); Energy Income Fund, L.P. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Drivetrain, LLC v. FiftySix Investments LLC

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Oct 19, 2023

    Katchen v. … .”); Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. R.F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Drivetrain, LLC v. Label

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Oct 19, 2023

    Katchen v. … .”); Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. R.F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Drivetrain, LLC v. DDE Partners, LLC

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Oct 19, 2023

    Katchen v. … .”); Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. R.F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Norm Gershman's Things to Wear, Inc. v. Peterson (In Re Peterson)

    332 B.R. 678 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Nov 15, 2005

    Warner, 538 U.S. 314, 321-22 , 123 S.Ct. 1462 , 155 L.Ed.2d 454 (2003) (quoting Brown v. … June 13, 1988)(same); In re Ertz, 28 B.R. 1020, 1022 (D.S.D.1983) *685 (same); In re Brown, 263 B.R. 832, 834 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2000)(same); In re McQueen, 102 B.R. 120, 124 (Bankr.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Greystone Business Credit II, LLC (In re USA Detergents, Inc.)

    418 B.R. 533 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Oct 16, 2009

    Russell v. … At all relevant times, Chance was also Titan's CEO and President, Hensell was Titan’s CFO and Marks was the Chairman of the Board of Titan. .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • In re Kalvar Microfilm, Inc.

    208 B.R. 819 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · May 7, 1997

    Smith v. Hoboken Railroad Warehouse & S.S. Connecting Co., 328 U.S. 123 , 66 S.Ct. 947 , 90 L.Ed. 1123 (1946) (Court should stay its hand pending a decision by the Interstate Commerce Commission); Nathanson v. … N.L.R.B., 344 U.S. 25, 30 , 73 S.Ct. 80, 83-84 , 97 L.Ed. 23 (1952) (same ruling vis-a-vis the National Labor Relations Board); Order of Railway Conductors v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Yellow Corporation

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Sep 12, 2025

    4 Id. § 1125(a)(1). 5 Id. 6 See, e.g., Century Glove, Inc. v. … Under the Plan, the Committee has the exclusive right to appoint four of the five members of the Liquidating Trust Board of Managers (the “Trust Board”) and nominate (with the Debtors being the only other

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Three A'S Holdings, L.L.C.

    364 B.R. 550 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Mar 5, 2007

    Co. v. Rancho Santa Fe Ass’n, 177 Cal.App.3d 726 , 223 Cal.Rptr. 175, 177 (1986). … Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 751 , 104 S.Ct. 3315 , 82 L.Ed.2d 556 (1984).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Philip Services Corp. v. Luntz (In Re Philip Services (Delaware) Inc.)

    284 B.R. 541 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Oct 18, 2002

    Brown, 297 U.S. 227 , 56 S.Ct. 450 , 80 L.Ed. 655 (1936)). … Co. v. Brown, 297 U.S. 227, 229 , 56 S.Ct. 450 , 80 L.Ed. 655 (1936). The Tenna Court interpreted this language very narrowly.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS v. Vagenas

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Sep 5, 2025

    P. 15(a)(2). 45 Logue v. Patient First Corp., 246 F. Supp.3d 1124, 1127 (D. Md. 2017). See also United States ex rel. D’Agostino v. … Del. 2011); Kost v. Kozakiewicz, 1 F.3d 176, 183 (3d Cir. 1993); Burtch v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Our Alchemy, LLC - Adversary Proceeding

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Sep 16, 2019

    In the corporate context, Kahn v. … In Kahn v. Lynch, the controller was so brazen as to tell the board “you must listen to us” and threatened to take full control of the company if the board did not meet their demands. Id. at 1114.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dawson

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Feb 9, 2026

    Inc., 20-12702; Drivetrain LLC v. Dawson, Adv. Proc. … P. 7056). 11 Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249 (1986); Big Apple BMW, Inc. v. BMW of N. Am., Inc., 974 F.2d 1358, 1363 (3d Cir. 1992).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Tribune Co.

    464 B.R. 126 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Oct 31, 2011

    See Gillman v. … King v. St.

    Cited 50 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.