Case law

Mallgren v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 2025

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668- 71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Doe v. Department of the Navy

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2026

See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151-52 (D.C. Cir. 2015). III. … See Brown v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 164 F.

Richardson v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2019

See Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380 (2007). … Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 21 (1993).

Wood v. American Federation of Government Employees

255 F. Supp. 3d 190 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 2017

See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F. Supp. 2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C. 1998) (quoting Kuwait Airways Corp. v. American Security Bank, N.A., 890 F.2d 456, 463 n.11 (D.C.Cir.1989)).

Youssef v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

541 F. Supp. 2d 121 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2008

See Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … In Brown v. Brody, the D.C.

Morgan v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2026

its arguments regarding the rulings in Brown[ v. … Mem. at 10; see Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 498–99 (1954), supplemented sub nom. Brown v. Bd. of Educ. of Topeka, Kan., 349 U.S. 294 (1955); see also Speed v. Mills, 919 F.

Boone v. Mountainmade Foundation

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 15, 2010

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Jones v. Bernanke

493 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 2007

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999); Stewart v. Ashcroft, 352 F.3d 422, 428 (D.C.Cir.2003); Carroll v. England, 321 F.Supp.2d 58, 68 (D.D.C.2004). … Brown v. Bank One, N.A., 168 Fed.Appx. 46, 53 (6th Cir.2006) (stating that facts that were insufficient to establish a prima facie case were also insufficient to establish pretext).

Cobb v. United States

104 F. Supp. 3d 61 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 2015

Board of Parole,” id., which utilized “a numerical scoring system . . . to guide the Board in making the [discretionary] decision to grant or deny parole.” McRae v. Hyman, 667 A.2d 1356, 1360 (D.C. 1995). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002); see Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39-40 (D.C.

Hatch v. Ooms

69 F. Supp. 788 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 23, 1947

Div., in the case of United' States v. … In a brief, signed by both Brown and Dorsey, in the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, under the caption “The Last Step Wins and Commercial Success is Persuasive of Invention,” an argument is made and excerpts

Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 2, 2025

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 326 (1962); see also Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Tech. … FTC v. H.J. Heinz Co., 246 F.3d 708, 718 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (quotation marks omitted); see also FTC v. Whole Foods Mkt., Inc., 548 F.3d 1028, 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (opinion of Brown, J.)

Heagney v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 2025

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (cleaned up). … (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999)); Chambers v. District of Columbia, 35 F.4th 870, 882 (D.C. Cir. 2022) (“For these reasons, we overrule Brown[.]”).

Hamilton v. District of Columbia

720 F. Supp. 2d 102 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 6, 2010

Dist. of Columbia Bd. of Higher Educ., 359 A.2d 28 , 31 n. 4 (D.C.1976) (holding the Board of Education is not a suable entity); Miller v. … Torre v. Barry, 661 F.2d 1371, 1374-75 (D.C.Cir.1981). They are not subject to the rule in Brown v. GSA under which Title VII is the exclusive remedy for federal employees’ discrimination claims.

Anderson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

360 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2003

Id.; Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999). … National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), 35 Public Law Board No. 5808 (1997) (Deinhardt, Arb.).

Elghannam v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy

151 F. Supp. 3d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 2015

Case No. 15-cv-01554 (CRC) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BOARDS OF PHARMACY, Defendant. … Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151 (D.C. Cir. 2015). 2  II.

International City Management Ass'n Retirement Corp. v. Watkins

726 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 17, 1989

Brown v. Shimabukuro, 118 F.2d 17, 18 (D.C.Cir.1941). Here, the statements in the ICMA-RC complaint are directly related to its cause of action against Watkins. … Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241, 1247 (D.C.App.1986); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 767, Comment d.

United States League of Savings Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

463 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 1978

V 1975). 26 . Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, I) 8. 27 . See, e. g., Investment Co. Institute v. … See, e. g., First National Bank in Plant City v.

Harper v. Department of the Navy

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2025

Plaintiff, a resident of Florida, sues the Department of the Navy, the Board for Correction of Naval Records, the Department of Defense, the Secretary of the Navy (in his official capacity), three naval officers (in their … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, the Complaint is neither short nor plain, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), the allegations cannot be described as simple, concise, and direct, see Fed. R.

Parks v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 2020

See Brown v. Brown, 343 A.2d 59, 61 (D.C. 1975). … Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1024 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (quoting Tsintolas Realty Co. v. Mendez, 984 A.2d 181, 187 (D.C. 2009)).

In Re Inslaw, Inc.

97 B.R. 685 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 1989

Conway and Brown will conduct the litigation in the Board of Contract Appeals and Court of Claims arising directly out of the contract. … Based upon the leading case of Woods v. City Nat.