Case law

Singletary v. District of Columbia

685 F. Supp. 2d 81 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2010

Commissioners of Bryan Co. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 407 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Brown, 520 U.S. at 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 ; cf. City of Canton v.

Csicseri v. Bowsher

862 F. Supp. 547 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 1994

Kearns himself admitted that his appraisals were not “exceptional across the board”. PLEx. 66-74. Tr.Vol. II 366; Tr.Vol. IV 739-42; Tr.Vol. V 779-80, 796-97. 50. Mr. … V 909-10. 51. Julius Brown, according to plaintiffs, applied for every ECDP class from 1982 until his retirement. Defendant states that Mr.

D'Amico Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. United States Service Industries, Inc.

867 F. Supp. 1075 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 3, 1994

The Board petitioned for injunctive relief just eleven weeks after the final complaint was issued. See Pascarelli v. Vibra Screw Inc., 904 F.2d 874, 881 (3d Cir.1990); Blyer v. … Brown v. Artery Org., Inc., 654 F.Supp. 1106, 1119 (D.D.C.1987). The public interest will most readily be served by a return to the status quo in order to permit violations of the NLRA to be effectively remedied. B.

American Federation of Government Employees, Local 812 v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

733 F. Supp. 2d 94 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 19, 2010

Fed. of Gov’t Employees, Local 812 v. Broad. Bd. of Gov’rs (“AFGE”), 711 F.Supp.2d 139 (D.D.C.2010). … Bar Ass’n, 466 F.Supp.2d 224, 227 (D.D.C.2006) (discussing Rule 60(b) standard); see also Rogers v.

Garcia v. District of Columbia

56 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 1999

Board of the County Comm’rs of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 , 117 S.Ct. 1382, 1388, 1390 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Dixon v. Brown, 38 F.3d 379 (8th Cir. 1994). Accord, Hershberger v. Scaletta, 33 F.3d 955 (8th Cir.1994); see Franco v. Kelly, 854 F.2d 584 (2d Cir.1988)(disciplin-ary charges expunged); Smith v.

Harbor Insurance v. Schnabel Foundation Co.

992 F. Supp. 419 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 4, 1997

See Meek v. Shepard, 484 A.2d at 581 . Mr. Brown clearly presented a standard of care based on how other subcontractors under similar conditions in this area design and install sheeting and shoring systems. 9 . … Brown and Mr.

Syneeda Lynn Penland v. Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr.

181 F. Supp. 3d 100 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 20, 2016

The Board of Correction of Naval Records Ms. Penland turned to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR). … Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015); Richardson v. United States, 193 F.3d 545, 548 (D.C. Cir. 1999). Ms.

Knop Ex Rel. Avenir Corp. v. MacKall

640 F. Supp. 2d 58 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 6, 2009

Johnson-Brown, 257 F.Supp.2d at 181 (citing Garcia v. Amfels, Inc., 254 F.3d 585, 588 (5th Cir. 2001)). A. … Johnson-Brown, 257 F.Supp.2d at 181 (citing Garcia, 254 F.3d at 588 ); see Garbie v.

Reilly v. Secretary of the Navy

12 F. Supp. 3d 125 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 2014

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Under Rule 12(b)(1), the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. See Lujan v. … DATE: January 29, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Burton v. Batista

339 F. Supp. 2d 97 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 12, 2004

. § 2000e et seq., plaintiff Robert Burton claims that he was the victim of unlawful sexual harassment and retaliation by defendant National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”), and specifically by his supervisor Lisa Bevels. … Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002); Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999).

CITIZENS FOR RESP. & ETHICS IN WASH. v. Leavitt

577 F. Supp. 2d 427 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2008

Where, as here, plaintiff offers no reason to doubt Brown’s veracity, discovery under Rule 56(f) may not be used to test her credibility. 5 Strang v. U.S. … E; Brown Decl. V 24, Ex. E.) 3 .

Velazquez v. United States Department of the Army

District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 2026

See Bowman v. Iddon, 848 F.3d 1034, 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2017). That means, among other things, considering factual allegations from all his filings, not just his complaint. Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. … “This review is done through the [Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)].” Wil- helmus v. Geren, 796 F. Supp. 2d 157, 161 (D.D.C. 2011).

Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

410 F. Supp. 63 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 1976

See, Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2021 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476, 488 (1974). … National Treasury Employees Union v. Nixon, supra at 322-323. Defendants do, however, correctly point out a two (2) hour error in calculating the hours of one of plaintiffs’ attorneys.

Hartman v. Duffey

973 F. Supp. 199 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 4, 1997

See Murray v. Weinberger, 741 F.2d 1423, 1433 (D.C.Cir.1984). The Supreme Court’s decision in Landgraf v. … Following the Landgraf decision, the District of Columbia Circuit held in Brown v.

Farzam v. Isaacson

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 11, 2015

Cir. 1997) (citing Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. Cir. 1985)). … Bowden v. United States, 106 F.3d 433, 438 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (citing Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 15 (D.C. Cir. 1985)). Ms.

Walker v. Waller

267 F. Supp. 2d 31 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 2, 2003

Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets, 313 U.S. 100 , 61 S.Ct. 868 , 85 L.Ed. 1214 (1941); Nwachukwu v. … Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M Street LLC, 257 F.Supp.2d 175, 178 (D.D.C.2003).

Shaffer v. George Washington University

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2021

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint “must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” … Brown v. Sessions, 774 F.3d 1016, 1024 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (quoting Tsintolas Realty Co. v. Mendez, 984 A.2d 181, 187 (D.C. 2009)).

Barrett v. Young

134 F. Supp. 106 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 9, 1951

The Board of Commissioners is a creature of statute and derives its powers from express statutory authority which is in the nature of a restraining rather than an enabling act. Hazard v. … A claim of privilege to refuse to answer a question is personal to the witness, Brown v. Walker, 1896, 161 U.S. 591 , 16 S.Ct. 644 , 40 L.Ed. 819 .

Fraternal Order of Police v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

391 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2005

See, e.g., Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341, 343 , 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976), overruled in part on other grounds by Cleveland Board of Educ. v. … .”); Babbitt v.

Save Our Schools-Southeast & Northeast v. District of Columbia Board of Education

564 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 11, 2008

Save Our Sch., 2006 WL 1827654 , at *4 (citing Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 , 123 S.Ct. 2411 , 156 L.Ed.2d 257 (2003); Allen v. … Buggs v. Powell, 293 F.Supp.2d 135, 141 (D.D.C.2003) (citing FDIC v. Bender, 127 F.3d 58, 67-68 (D.C.Cir.1997)).