Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

3.97s

  • Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2011

    See also Kalwasinski v. Fed. … Employees v. Horner, 879 F.2d 873, 876 (D.C. Cir. 1989); see also Blazy v. Tenet, 979 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boone v. MOUNTAINMADE FOUNDATION

    684 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 15, 2010

    Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Gregory v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    515 F. Supp. 113 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 3, 1980

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Western Presbyterian Church v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of the District of Columbia

    849 F. Supp. 77 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 15, 1994

    District of Columbia Zoning Administrator (“Zoning Administrator”), acting in his capacity as agent of the District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, 2) the March 2,1994 decision on appeal of the Board … Area Transit Auth. v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841, 844 (D.C.Cir.1977). This Court finds that the plaintiffs have borne that burden, therefore, the preliminary injunction will issue.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1812 v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 18, 2010

    Goland v. CIA, 607 F.2d 339, 355 (D.C. … Maynard v. C.I.A., 986 F.2d 547, 560 (1st Cir. 1993); Carney v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. National Labor Relations Board

    118 F. Supp. 3d 171 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 2015

    Board Mot. at 5–6. In support of this argument, the Board relies on Reno v. … Chamber of Commerce v. Brown, 554 U.S. 60, 67–68 (2008), quoting Letter Carriers v. Austin, 418 U.S. 264, 272–73 (1974).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Nanko Shipping, USA v. Alcoa, Inc.

    850 F.3d 461 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 10, 2017

    Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981), and McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973)); Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1022-23 (D.C. … Bell Atlantic Corp. v.

    Cited 62 timesPublished
  • American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1812 v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 19, 2010

    of Gov’t Employees, Local 812 v. Broad. Bd. of Gov’rs (“AFGE”), No. 09-CV-1191, 2010 WL 1976747 (D.D.C. May 18, 2010). … Supp. 2d 224, 227 (D.D.C. 2006) (discussing Rule 60(b) standard); see also Rogers v. Mabus, 699 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hill v. Board of Trustees University of District of Columbia

    245 F. Supp. 3d 214 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2017

    Winston & Strawn, LLP v. McLean, 843 F.3d 503, 508 (D.C. Cir. 2016); Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e) advisory committee’s 2010 note. … See Johnson v. Interstate Mgmt. Co., No. 14-7164, 2017 WL 836090, at *5 (D.C. Cir. 2017).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Student Marketing Corp.

    360 F. Supp. 284 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 1973

    Agreement”) was executed by the Interstate Board of Directors on August 15, 1969. … In S.E.C. v.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Ruiz v. Millennium Square Residential Association

    156 F. Supp. 3d 176 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 2016

    Aliron Int’l, Inc. v. Cherokee Nation Indus., Inc., 531 F.3d 863, 865 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Brown v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, 267 F. Supp. 2d 61, 66–67 (D.D.C. 2003). … Brown v. Wheat First Sec., Inc., 257 F.3d 821, 825 (D.C. Cir. 2001). There is no statutory claim here.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. District of Columbia Government

    965 F. Supp. 2d 90 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 30, 2013

    Robinson’s friends allegedly told Officer Brown about this injury, Officer Brown refused to remove his arm from Mr. Robinson’s neck. After he was arrested, Mr. … The second document is a 2003 report issued by the Citizen Complaint Review Board (“2003 CCRB Report”).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ramsey v. Faust

    943 F. Supp. 2d 77 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 6, 2013

    Given that “under the pre-1987 regime, the [Parole] Board’s discretion to grant or deny parole was totally unfettered,” Sellmon v. Reilly, 561 F. … See, e.g., Brown v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 713 F. Supp. 2d 11, 13-14 (D.D.C. 2010). B.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • National Ass'n for Advancement of Colored People v. N.A.A.C.P. Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.

    559 F. Supp. 1337 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 1983

    The resolution did not result from any philosophical divergence but, rather, was adopted primarily as a countermeasure to “massive resistance” to their efforts to enforce compliance with Brown v. … Board of Educ., 611 F.2d 624 , 637 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 2999 , 64 L.Ed.2d 862 (1980); NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. v. Campbell, 504 F.Supp. 1365, 1368 (D.D.C.1981).

    Reversed on other grounds by National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, AKA Naacp v. N.A.A.C.P. Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., 753 F.2d 131 (1985)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Shinabargar v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2015

    a motion to dismiss (“Motion”) filed by Defendants Board of 16 Trustees of The University of The District of Columbia (“UDC”), Katherine S. … See Goldlawr, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Air Alliance Houston v. U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 2019

    Circuit’s decision in Friends of Animals v. Jewell also contradicts the Board’s excessively narrow view of informational standing. See 824 F.3d 1033 (D.C. Cir. 2016). … In AARP v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Greenhouse v. Geren

    574 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 2, 2008

    Accordingly, an employee seeking to challenge a retaliatory evaluation would be required to go through the OSC before appealing to the Board. See Cruz v. … Hubbard v. EPA, 809 F.2d 1 (D.C.Cir.1986) (citing Clarkson v. IRS, 678 F.2d 1368 ).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    762 F. Supp. 2d 123 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 3, 2011

    Concepcion v. FBI, 606 F.Supp.2d 14, 30 (D.D.C.2009); see also SafeCard Servs., Inc. v. … Indus., Inc. v. United States, 615 F.2d 527, 529-30 (D.C.Cir.1980); see also Bloomberg, L.P. v. Bd. of Governors of the Fed.

    Cited 97 timesPublished
  • Jones v. U.S. Department of Justice

    111 F. Supp. 3d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2015

    Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C. Cir. 1985). 6 Failure to exhaust is not a jurisdictional bar to bringing suit under Title VII. 4 See Bowden v. … Cir. 1997); Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. National Labor Relations Board

    879 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2012

    v. … Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeoronautics Board, 379 F.2d 453, 460 (D.C. Cir. 1967).

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.