Case law

Florida v. United States

885 F. Supp. 2d 299 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 16, 2012

I am registered in the --- Party; that I am a qualified voter of the county; and that I have not voted in this election. … I am registered in the — Party; that I am a qualified voter of the county; and that I have not voted in this election.

Lewis v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 2022

Here, the plaintiffs’ claims clearly fall within the purview of the following provisions referenced by the defendant because they are claims arising substantively under the Medicare Act. … Although this outcome might affect future claims, granting the plaintiffs’ injunction would not qualify as prospective relief because the Court would be addressing the enforcement of a purportedly invalid regulation, which

Taylor Energy Co. v. United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

271 F. Supp. 3d 73 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 21, 2017

“To qualify for the deliberative process privilege, an intra-agency memorandum must be both pre-decisional and deliberative.” Abtew, 808 F.3d at 898 (citing Coastal, 617 F.2d at 866 (D.C. Cir. 1980)); Whitaker v. U.S. … These statements not only explain how the redacted emails involved communications with an attorney, but also clearly link the four redacted emails to the “attorney-client relationship” that the BSEE formed with DOJ to obtain

Dl v. District of Columbia

187 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 18, 2016

It provides, more broadly, that “no otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States . . . shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits … Partially for that reason, other courts have considered the complexity of a law or difficulty in establishing liability when determining whether or not to issue a declaratory judgment.

Queen v. Schultz

310 F.R.D. 10 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2015

It is well-established that attorneys may testify as fact witnesses regarding their personal knowledge of the events in question. See, e.g., Tardiff v. Geico Indem. Co., 481 F. … See Verdict Form, ECF No. 178 (“Did the plaintiff establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he and the defendant formed a partnership? No.”).

Yee v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 7, 2022

See Letter from 3 The complaint does not offer details about these documents, but they are clearly incorporated into the complaint. See, e.g., Compl. ¶¶ 27–34. … To establish an adverse employment action, a plaintiff must show that she “experience[d] materially 6 At one point, the D.C.

Evans v. Fenty

714 F. Supp. 2d 116 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2010

Defendants object to this ruling on the ground that Sumner’s “education and experience make him eminently more qualified than the Special Masters to determine what data provide a sufficient basis for systemic conclusions … As the Special Masters observed, “the District is bound to meet the standards established by the court orders.” {Id. at 12.)

Hawkins v. Holder

597 F. Supp. 2d 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 8, 2009

Although Hawkins’ briefing is less than a model of clarity and fails to clearly set forth the exact claims she seeks in the instant lawsuit, it appears from the Court’s own review of Hawkins’ complaint and briefing that Hawkins … Tomlinson, 507 F.Supp.2d 2 (D.D.C.2007) (“a lateral transfer must have materially adverse job-related consequences to qualify as an adverse action, for ‘purely subjective injuries ... are not adverse actions’ ”) (quoting

Marino v. Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 6, 2016

Marino did not qualify for a waiver or fee reduction. It again directed him either to narrow his request or designate the amount of money he was willing to pay. EOUSA concluded its letter by informing Mr. … A nonmoving party, however, must establish more than “[t]he mere existence of a scintilla of evidence” in support of its position. Id. at 252.

Miller v. Saul

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 2024

He then observes—in passing—that it is unclear that “slurred speech” qualifies as a relevant limitation under the “interacting with others” umbrella. Id. at 28. … Dennis, Nolte, Bedeau, and Goo” establish that she also has “exertional limitations which preclude [her from] performing the full range of light work,” id. at 22.

Rojas-Vega v. United States Immigration and Custom Enforcement

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2018

Exemptions 6 and 7(C) Exemption 6 protects “personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6). … Any information that “applies to a particular individual” qualifies for consideration under this exemption. U.S. Dep’t of State v. Washington Post Co., 456 U.S. 595, 602 (1982).

Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2017

. § 552(b)(6) (exempting from FOIA “personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy). II. … Supp. 3d 23, 27 (D.D.C. 2014) (“A document that qualifies as a federal record may not be discarded except as provided by statute.”)).

Msp Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Pfizer, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2024

If so, in view of the allegations in the Amended Complaint, do the plaintiffs’ named assignors qualify as “direct” or as “indirect” purchasers? … , carry on, or facilitate the promotion, management, establishment or carrying on” of those activities.

Dinkel v. Medstar Health Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 1, 2015

The other three provisions are clearly inapplicable to the uniform maintenance activities in this case. Neither party points to any decisions of the D.C. Court of Appeals—or the D.C. … Defendants characterize Plaintiffs’ proposal as effectively defining “work” as “work” and, thus, providing little assistance in delineating activities that qualify as compensable work.

United States v. Stone

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 2019

The regulation clearly states that it was promulgated to “replace” the expiring Ethics in Government Act, see Office of Special Counsel, 64 Fed. … enabling a special counsel to have the same role as the Independent Counsel,” and that special counsel appointed pursuant to sections 509, 510, and 515 do not qualify.

National Wildlife Federation v. Lujan

733 F. Supp. 419 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 1990

That action clearly is contrary to SMCRA and cannot stand. Additionally, the Secretary’s reasons for declining to exercise jurisdiction are wholly unpersuasive. … In its brief, NWF suggests that 7,000 sites are subject to possible exemptions that would qualify under the current definition of previously mined. Pltfs' Mem. in Supp. at 56.

State of Texas v. United States of America

887 F. Supp. 2d 133 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2012

Such a plan would be clearly retrogressive under the current version of section 5. Yet Dr. … Gallego — reflects the reality of established minority voting power.

Rosario v. United States

389 F. Supp. 3d 122 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2019

Vizcaino to establish that Mr. Rosario intended to purchase and sell cocaine and that he was accountable for 4.4 kilograms of cocaine. During the sentencing phase, Mr. … The standard is not so clearly articulated in the context of a petition for a writ of error coram nobis , and the First Circuit has cautioned that " '[w]hen a defendant seeks to vacate a guilty plea conviction by way of coram

United States v. Bozell IV

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 16, 2022

The Court therefore agrees with Judge Friedrich that “[w]hether the [Electoral Count] Act is constitutional has no bearing on whether the congressional certification qualifies as an ‘official proceeding’ within the plain … Those charges, if proven, would clearly constitute violations of § 1752 18 under the statute’s plain text.

Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Bender

595 F. Supp. 1209 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 1984

Fraud “must be established by clear and convincing evidence, which is not equally consistent with either honesty or deceit.” Bennett v. … Clearly, defendants were not damaged as a result.