Case law

Maher v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

271 F. Supp. 3d 296 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2017

Cl. 413; Maher v. FDIC (Maher III), 441 F.3d 522 (7th Cir. 2006); Maher v. United States (Maher II), 314 F.3d 600 (Fed. Cir. 2002); Maher v. Harris Trust & Sav. Bank (Maher I), 75 F.3d 1182 (7th Cir. 1996). … DATE: September 26, 2017 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Banks v. Farello

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2026

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff’s allegations are vague and board, rather than clear and direct, see Fed. R. Civ. … Corp. v.

National Black Police Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

858 F. Supp. 251 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 1994

In Day v. Hayes and Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. … See also Day v. Hayes, Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v.

Bender v. Jordan

District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2009

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Brown v. Paulson, 541 F. Supp. 2d 379, 383 (D.D.C. 2008) (internal citations omitted). III.

Paul v. Judicial Watch, Inc.

571 F. Supp. 2d 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 2008

Id. at 1055-56 (quoting Board of Education of New York City v. Nyquist, 590 F.2d 1241, 1246 (2d Cir.1979)) (citations, footnotes and internal quotation marks omitted). … In doing so, it specifically cites two cases, Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 486 A.2d 37 (D.C.1984) (en banc) and T.C. Theatre Corp. v.

International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Railway Labor Conference

310 F. Supp. 905 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 1970

National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); National Labor Relations Board v. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 449, 353 U.S. 87 , 77 S.Ct. 643 , 1 L.Ed.2d 676 (1957). … National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, supra, 380 U.S. at 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Truck Drivers Union, supra, 353 U.S. at 87, 77 S.Ct. 643 .

National Ass'n of Mortgage Brokers v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

770 F. Supp. 2d 283 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2011

(“NAIHP”) against the Board. … For example, in Hanson v.

National Labor Relations Board Professional Association v. Federal Service Impasses Panel

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 2, 2020

* v. … Defendant National Labor Relations Board (“the NLRB”) consents to the motion. The motion is fully briefed, and no hearing is necessary. See Loc. R. 105.6.

Alraee v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia

889 F. Supp. 2d 73 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 5, 2012

Brown v. Dist. of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)). … Payne v. Salazar, 619 F.3d 56, 65 (D.C. Cir. 2010); see also Bowers v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 10-2056 (ESH), 2011 WL 2160945, at *4 (D.D.C.

Long Beach Securities Corp. v. National Credit Union Administration Board

District Court, District of Columbia · May 7, 2018

The same rebuttal could be applied to each of the cases on which the Board relies. The Board cites McKelvey v. Sec ’y ofU.S. … The Board also cites Mallory v.

United States v. Kpmg LLP

316 F. Supp. 2d 30 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 2004

The second case is John Doe # 1 v. … Under the rationale set forth above in United States v. BDO Seidman, 337 F.3d 802 (7th Cir.2003), John Doe # 1 v. Wachovia Corp., 268 F.Supp.2d 627 (W.D.N.C.2003), and John Doe 1, John Doe 2 v. KPMG LLP, U.s., C.A.

Board of County Commissioners of Kay County, Oklahoma v. Federal Housing Finance Agency

956 F. Supp. 2d 184 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 26, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________ ) THE BOARD OF COUNTY ) COMMISSIONERS OF KAY … AGENCY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ ) OPINION The Board

Stanton v. Whitley

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 14, 2022

The other test is set forth in NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc., 691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982). … The Browning-Ferris Test The Browning-Ferris test leads the Court to the same conclusion.

12 Percent Logistics, Inc. v. Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 2, 2018

See, e.g., Ellipso, Inc. v. Mann, 460 F. … Pension Fund v. ZAK Architectural Metal & Glass LLC, 736 F. Supp. 2d 35, 38 (D.D.C. 2010) (citing Armstrong v. Exec. Office of the President, 1 F.3d 1274, 1289 (D.C. Cir.1993)).

Richardson v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 2018

In Federal Aviation Administration v. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 246 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (discussing “special damages” under Rule 9(g) in a non-Privacy Act context) (internal citations omitted); see also Welborn, 218 F.

Ward v. Califano

443 F. Supp. 89 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 12, 1977

Bell v. Brown, 557 F.2d 849 (D.C.Cir. May 20, 1977) and cases cited therein. … Early v. Klassen, 10 E.P.D. § 10,507 (D.D.C.1975).

Woods v. Thompson

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2024

Lee v. United States Agency for Int'l Dev., 859 F.3d 74, 77-78 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (quoting Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 316 (1979)). … Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 573-74 (1992).

Sellmon v. Reilly

561 F. Supp. 2d 46 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 20, 2008

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). That is all that Phillips has offered here. … Moreover, Phillips’s unsupported characterization. of the Parole Board’s practice prior to 1987 is insufficient under the D.C. Circuit’s precedent in Fletcher v.

Hobson Ex Rel. Hobson v. Hansen

269 F. Supp. 401 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 19, 1967

So it was in Brown v. Board of Education, Bolling v. Sharpe, and Baker v. Carr. So it is in the South where federal courts are making brave attempts to implement the mandate of Brown . So it is here. … Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686 (1954). 156 . See Dowell v. School Board, W.D.Okl., 244 F.Supp. 971, 976 (1965), affirmed, sub nom. Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City, etc. v.

LOCAL UNION NO. 112, INT. U. ALLIED INDUS. WKRS. v. Rothman

209 F. Supp. 295 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 1962

209 F.Supp. 295 (1962) LOCAL UNION NO. 112, INTERNATIONAL UNION ALLIED INDUSTRIAL WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Plaintiff, v. Stuart ROTHMAN, General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board, Frank W. … Brown, Members, National Labor Relations Board, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 929-62. United States District Court District of Columbia. October 9, 1962. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff; Herbert S.