Case law

Khatri v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 5, 2025

Khatri, proceeding pro se, brings this civil action against the defendant, the Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia (the “Board”), asserting a claim of retaliation in violation of Title VII of … Board “did not follow its own procedures and [ ] regulations.”

McRae v. Olive

368 F. Supp. 2d 91 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2005

District of Columbia Board of Higher Education, 359 A.2d 28 , 31 n. 4 (D.C.1976)(D.C. Board of Higher Education); Miller v. Spencer, 330 A.2d 250 , 251 n. 1 (D.C.1974 (Department of Sanitation); Ray v. … Board of the County Comm’rs of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). Mr.

Loma Linda-Inland Consortium for Healthcare Education v. National Labor Relations Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 11, 2023

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Defendant. … NLRB v.

Krenzer v. Ford

429 F. Supp. 499 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 7, 1977

Griggs v. Duke Power, supra. … Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976), establishes Title VII as the sole statutory remedy against the Government for race or sex discrimination in employment.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF HOTEL & RESTAURANT EMP. LOCAL 25 v. Madison Hotel

896 F. Supp. 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 4, 1995

896 F.Supp. 14 (1995) BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the HOTEL AND RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES LOCAL 25 and Employers' Health and Welfare Fund, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MADISON HOTEL, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 94-2483 SSH. … Board of Trustees of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees Local 25 and Employers' Health and Welfare Fund, et al. v. Madison Hotel, Inc., Civ. No. 93-1239 (SSH).

Newman v. Kelly

848 F. Supp. 228 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 1994

District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of Trade, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 580 , 121 L.Ed.2d 513 (1992). … Citing Brown, the ALJ stated: [I]n 1990, under OBRA provisions, the U.S.

Lucas v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 2, 2019

Moncrieff, Sheila-Ford Haynes, an MPD Human Resources Specialist, and Pamela Brown, an attorney who represented the Board. During the meeting, Ms. … Brown v. Sec’y of Army, 918 F.2d 214, 216 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 5596(b)(1)). The Back Pay Act is “an auxiliary measure that operates only at the relief stage.” Brown, 918 F.2d at 217.

Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

627 F. Supp. 695 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 1986

of Governors v. … Becker, Inc. v.

A. G. Becker Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

502 F. Supp. 378 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 26, 1980

Ray v. Turner, 587 F.2d 1187 (D.C.Cir.1978); Vaughn v. Rosen, 484 F.2d 820 (1973), cert. denied 415 U.S. 977 , 94 S.Ct. 1564 , 39 L.Ed.2d 873 (1974). … Becker, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, No. 80-2258 (D.C.Cir., filed Oct. 14, 1980); A. G. Becker, Inc. v.

Townsend v. Mabus

736 F. Supp. 2d 250 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2010

Townsend; and the entire 256-page Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) hearing transcript. … s Mem. at 23-24); see also Brown v. Gen. Servs.

Cosgrove v. Thornburgh

703 F. Supp. 995 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 1988

Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 301-03 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1717-18 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). As such, they do not carry the force of law and are not part of the “power and authority” vested in the Board. … In Johnson v.

Agapito v. District of Columbia

477 F. Supp. 2d 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 2007

Brown. Pis.’ Ex. 15 at 2-3. He explained Mr. Brown’s supervisory efforts as follows: [Mr. … Board of Trustees of the Hotel & Restaurant Employees Local 25 v. JPR Inc., 136 F.3d 794, 801 (D.C.Cir.1998).

Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

669 F. Supp. 2d 126 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 19, 2009

Cruz-Packer v. Dist. of Columbia, 539 F.Supp.2d 181, 189 (D.D.C.2008) (quoting Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986)); Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. … See 5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(6)(C); Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Rossotti 326 F.3d 1309, 1310 (D.C.Cir. 2003) (citing Oglesby v. U.S. Dep’t of Army, 920 F.2d 57, 64-65 (D.C.Cir.1990)).

Daniel v. Fulwood

823 F. Supp. 2d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2011

Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Thomas v. Power

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2026

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835 (1976); see also Alhayoti v. Blinken, No. 21-cv-7713, 2022 WL 2869850, at *1, 4–5 (N.D. Cal.

Cintron v. Jetblue Airways Corp.

324 F. Supp. 3d 248 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2018

Bower v. EgyptAir Airlines Co. , 731 F.3d 85 , 93 (1st Cir. 2013) (quoting Brown v. United Airlines, Inc. , 720 F.3d 60 , 63 (1st Cir. 2013) ). … The Fourth Circuit has taken a similar middle-ground approach in Smith v. Comair, Inc. , 134 F.3d 254 , 259 (4th Cir. 1998) (holding that "boarding procedures are a service rendered by an airline").

Chandamuri v. Georgetown University

274 F. Supp. 2d 71 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2003

Circuit’s more recent analysis in Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Educ., 309 F.3d 1333 (11th Cir.2002). The Jackson court relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s assertion that: [P]rivate rights of action to enforce federal law must be created by Congress.

Washington v. District of Columbia

538 F. Supp. 2d 269 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2008

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . B. The Court Grants the Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss 1.

Carter v. Greenspan

304 F. Supp. 2d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2004

See Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C.Cir.1985); Lloyd v. Chao, 240 F.Supp.2d 1, 3 (D.D.C.2002). … See Brown, 199 F.3d at 452 . Causation is often demonstrated by proximity in time, see Gleklen v.

Maher v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

271 F. Supp. 3d 296 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2017

Cl. 413; Maher v. FDIC (Maher III), 441 F.3d 522 (7th Cir. 2006); Maher v. United States (Maher II), 314 F.3d 600 (Fed. Cir. 2002); Maher v. Harris Trust & Sav. Bank (Maher I), 75 F.3d 1182 (7th Cir. 1996). … DATE: September 26, 2017 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge