Case law

International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

383 F.2d 230 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 6, 1967

Stevens and Co. v. N. L. R. B., 380 F.2d 292 , decided July 7, 1967.) … B. v.

National Federation of Independent Business v. Architectural & Transportation Barriers Compliance Board

461 F. Supp. 2d 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 3, 2006

The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (“Access Board”) is an independent federal agency established by Section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act. … See Wyoming Outdoor Council v. U.S. Forest Service, 165 F.3d at 48-49 . Delay in review should not cause undue hardship to the plaintiffs members because the Access Board’s guidelines are not enforceable against them.

Hines v. Federal Aviation Administration

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 2024

Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 669 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (cleaned up). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Aerovias De Mexico, S.A. De C v. v. National Mediation Board

211 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2002

Clerks v. … See Herbert v.

University of the District of Columbia Faculty Ass'n v. Board of Trustees

994 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 3, 1998

actions. 6 The Control Board relies most heavily on the United States District Court’s opinion in Shook v. … United States v. Goldenberg, 168 U.S. 95 , 18 S.Ct. 3 , 42 L.Ed. 394 (1897); *6 Halverson v. Slater, 129 F.3d 180 (D.C.Cir.1997).

Harris v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · May 3, 2023

Houlahan v. 5 Brown, 979 F. Supp. 2d 86, 88 (D.D.C. 2013) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). … See, e.g., Brown v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp. (“Amtrak”), No. 18-CV-02216 (APM), 2018 WL 11217191, at *1 (D.D.C.

Shinabargar v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia

164 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2016

Brown v. … [and] sharpen[s] the issues to be litigated,” Brown v.

Herron v. Fannie Mae

857 F. Supp. 2d 87 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 30, 2012

See, e.g., Roberts v. Cameron-Brown, Co., 556 F.2d 356, 359 (5th Cir. 1977); Northrip, 527 F.2d at 30. … In American Bankers Mortgage Corp. v.

Bender v. Jordan

612 F. Supp. 2d 62 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2009

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Brown v. Paulson, 541 F.Supp.2d 379, 383 (D.D.C.2008) (internal citations omitted). III. ANALYSIS The Third-Party Plaintiffs take the position that five directors and the President/CEO were sued by Mr.

McCarl v. United States ex rel. Leland

42 F.2d 346 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 2, 1930

Thereupon appellee challenged the ruling as to the deficiency tax by appeal to the United States Board of Tax Appeals. That Board on January 20, 1930,. affirmed the decision of the Commissioner. Leland v. … Ed. 184 ; Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United States, 277 U. S. 551 , 48 S. Ct. 587 , 72 L. Ed. 985 ; Avery v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 22 F.(2d) 6 , 55 A. L. R. 1277; Brown v. Commissioner (C. C.

Albra v. Board of Trustees of Miami Dade College

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 15, 2018

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Moreover, in evaluating subject matter jurisdiction, the court “may consider materials outside the pleadings.” Am. Freedom Law Ctr. v. … See Tennessee v.

Richardson v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2016

Baird v. Gotbaum, 792 F.3d 166, 169 n.2 (D.C. Cir. 2015). The Court also considers the arguments and allegations in Mr. Richardson’s opposition memorandum. Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … Supp. 2d 185, 190 (D.D.C. 2013); Brown v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 603 F. Supp. 2d 73, 78 (D.D.C. 2009); Hardy v. District of Columbia, 601 F. Supp. 2d 182, 187 (D.D.C. 2009); Jenkins v. Jackson, 538 F.

Investment Co. Inst. v. BOARD OF GOV. OF FED. RES. SYS.

398 F. Supp. 725 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 1975

. § 1848 provides the exclusive means for reviewing orders of the Board under the Bank Holding Company Act. Whitney National Bank v. … Whitney National Bank v. Bank of New Orleans and Trust Company, 379 U.S. 411 , 85 S.Ct. 551 , 13 L.Ed.2d 386 (1965); Deutsch Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft v.

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

773 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2011

maintains a log of visitors who come to the Board’s buildings to see Board governors and staff. … Employees v. Horner, 879 F.2d 873, 876 (D.C.Cir.1989); see also Blazy v.

Cohen v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia

305 F.R.D. 10 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2014

Republic of Nigeria v. Ugwuonye, 901 F. … See, e.g., Inst. for Policy Studies, 246 F.R.D. at 386; Wilson v. Prudential Fin., 218 F.R.D. 1, 3–4 (D.D.C. 2003); Ramseur v. Barreto, 216 F.R.D. 180, 182–83 (D.D.C. 2003); Stephenson v. Cox, 223 F.

Resolution Trust Corp. v. McDougal

158 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 1994

In OTS v. Dobbs, Civ. … See FTC v. Browning, 435 F.2d 96 (D.C.Cir.1970); FEC v. Committee to Elect Lyndon LaRouche, 613 F.2d 849 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1074 , 100 S.Ct. 1019 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980); United States v.

Board of Trustees of Unite Here Local 25 v. MR Watergate LLC

677 F. Supp. 2d 229 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 6, 2010

Plaintiff Board of Trustees of Unite Here Local 25 and Hotel Association of Washington, D.C. … See id. at 1325 (citing Travis v. Harris Corp., 565 F.2d 443, 446 (7th Cir.1977)).

Kreis v. Secretary of the Air Force

648 F. Supp. 383 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 19, 1986

Dilley v. Alexander 603 F.2d 914, 920 (D.C.Cir.1979), 1 Owens v. Brown 455 F.Supp. 291, 300 (D.D.C.1978). In Mindes , the Fifth Circuit held that judicial deference to the military was not an absolute but was qualified. … See also Pauls v. Secretary of the Air Force, 457 F.2d 294, 297 (1st Cir.1972); Bluth v. Laird, 435 F.2d 1065, 1070-71 (4th Cir.1970); Muldonian v. United States, 432 F.2d 443, 447 (Ct.Cir.1970); Payson v.

National Black Police Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

924 F. Supp. 270 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 18, 1996

The resulting opinion denying the motion is published at National Black Police Association v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, 858 F.Supp. 251 (D.D.C. 1994). … V. OTHER PROVISIONS OF INITIATIVE 41 Three substantial portions of Initiative 41 were not addressed in the parties’ evidence or arguments. The first is the applicability of the cap to Board of Education races.

Larry v. Department of Veterans Affairs

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 23, 2015

LARRY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) Case: 1:15—cv-00981 v. ) Assigned To : Unassigned ) Assign. Date : 6/23/2015 A.L. HILL, etal., 3 Description: Pro Se Gen. … Brown, 125 F. 3d 965, 974 (6th Cir. 1997) (dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction plaintiffs’ challenge to constitutionality of procedures by which Regional Office and Board of Veterans Appeals adjudicate claims