Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.44s
Budik v. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
937 F. Supp. 2d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 2013
Id. at 7 (citing United States v. Brown, 348 U.S. 110 (1954)). The plaintiff’s reliance on Brown is misplaced. … Brown, 348 U.S. at 110-11.
Cited 50 timesPublishedSecurities & Exchange Commission v. National Student Marketing Corp.
457 F. Supp. 682 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 1978
Between board meetings, all management authority was delegated to an executive committee composed of Brown, Tate, Bach, Allison and Biegler. • Max E. … . —, at —, 587 F.2d 1149, at 1171 ; Goldberg v. Meridor, 567 F.2d 209, 218-19 (2d Cir. 1977); Alton Box Board Co. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., 560 F.2d 916, 919-20 (8th Cir. 1977); Wright v.
Cited 36 timesPublishedBrink's, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
466 F. Supp. 116 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 1979
In Federal Reserve Bank of Boston v. … See A.M.R., Inc. v.
Cited 7 timesPublished109 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 2000
fact or to have taken steps to learn of Detective Brown’s similar misrepresentations in the past is a violation of either Brady v. … Judge Hogan concluded that even if the jury had never heard about Detective Brown’s Board certification as a pharmacist, “it is likely that they would still have credited his testimony since it was supported by twenty-five
Cited 7 timesPublished317 F. Supp. 1162 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 6, 1970
’s Union, Local 46 v. … However, the Courts have noted three exceptions: where Board action constituted a denial of constitutional rights, Fay v.
Cited 2 timesPublished104 F. Supp. 310 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 1952
Hiatt v. Brown, 339 U.S. 103 , 70 S.Ct. 495 , 94 L.Ed. 691 , decided March 13, 1950. … Thereafter a subsequent review was had by the Board of Review, and thereafter a further review was had by the Judicial Council.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBadwal v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia
139 F. Supp. 3d 295 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2015
Squires v. Brown, 604 F. Supp. 2d 236, 238 (D.D.C. 2006). … See Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1019 (D.C. Cir. 2014); Cobb v. Howard Univ., 70 App. D.C. 339, 342 (D.C.Cir. 1939); Edinger v. Bd. of Regents of Morehead State Univ., 906 F.2d 1136, 1141 (6th Cir. 1990).
Cited 61 timesPublishedFrost Brown Todd LLC v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 5, 2024
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FROST BROWN TODD LLC, Plaintiff, v. … Dale v. IRS, 238 F. Supp. 2d 99, 102–03 (D.D.C. 2002) (citing Gillian v. IRS, 980 F.2d 819 (1st Cir. 1992); Voinche v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 2025
Tanner-Brown v. Haaland, 105 F.4th 437, 443 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (subject matter jurisdiction); Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (failure to state a claim). … Ho, 106 F.4th at 50 (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015)) (quotation marks omitted).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMaxberry v. Department of the Army, Board of Correction of Military Records
952 F. Supp. 2d 48 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 3, 2013
Section 2401(a) of Title 28 governs the timing of suits brought by service members seeking to correct allegedly improper discharges or decisions rendered by administrative review boards. 1 Nihiser v. White, 211 F. … it runs from the date of the adverse review board decision.”
Cited 13 timesPublishedAssociation for the Benefit of Non-Contract Employees v. National Mediation Board
218 F. Supp. 114 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 3, 1963
The Board has also cited to the Court certain language from the recent case of WES Chapter, Flight Eng’rs’ Ass’n v. … Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297, 303 , 64 S.Ct. 95, 98 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943).
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2025
See Brown v. Jewell, 134 F. Supp. 3d 170, 176 (D.D.C. 2015) (Courts “have an independent obligation to determine whether subject- matter jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a challenge from any party.”) … Brown, 125 F.3d 965, 972–74 (6th Cir. 1997) (due process challenge to VA procedures); Weaver v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMarijuna Policy Project v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics
191 F. Supp. 2d 196 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2002
However, the Board refused to release the election results, fearing that to do so would violate the Barr Amendment. In Turner v. … The Board may also keep a measure off the ballot if it would be patently unconstitutional if enacted. See Comm. for Voluntary Prayer v. Wimberly, 704 A.2d 1199 (D.C.1997).
Cited 4 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Sullivan
773 F. Supp. 472 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 1991
Board of Trustees of State Univ. of N. Y. v. Fox, 492 U.S. 469, 473 , 109 S.Ct. 3028, 3031 , 106 L.Ed.2d 388 (1989). Defendants later conceded this point. Transcript of July 12, 1991 Hearing at 39. … The Court cited Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603, 605-06 , 87 S.Ct. 675, 683, 684-85 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967), in support of that statement.
Cited 8 timesPublishedAmerican Federation of Government Employees, Local 812 v. Broadcasting Board of Governors
711 F. Supp. 2d 139 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 18, 2010
Goland v. … See Steinberg v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedLocal 808, Building Maintenance, Service & Railroad Workers v. National Mediation Board
727 F. Supp. 639 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 1989
V This Court does not enter this injunction lightly. … National Mediation Board, 425 F.2d 527, 542 (D.C.Cir. 1970); Seaboard World Airways v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedStephens v. US Airways Group, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 7, 2012
See id. at 442 n.1 (Kavanaugh, J., concurring) (“Judge Brown’s opinion is the controlling opinion in this case because it presents the narrowest grounds of the opinions forming a majority.” (citing Marks v. … See Taylor v. D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublished434 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 1977
Brown, apparently all work in an office building located at 613 G Street, N.W. 1 and apparently have during the course of their employments occasionally shared an elevator in that building. … On April 2, 1976, plaintiff alleges, he boarded this elevator together with several other passengers, including both defendants.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCalifornia Air Resources Board v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, Plaintiff v. … See Landmark Legal Found. v. EPA, 272 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrink's, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
466 F. Supp. 112 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 11, 1979
Defendant, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), is a federal body also organized under the Federal Reserve Act and is charged with administering the nation’s monetary policy. 6. … As set forth in Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass’n v.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna