Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

4.89s

  • In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

    287 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 2012

    Surface Transportation Board Proceedings and 18 Class Action Lawsuits......15 C. … See Brown v. Kelly, 609 F.3d 467, 476 (2d Cir.2010) (“The Rule 23 requirements must be established by at least a preponderance of the evidence.”) (citing Teamsters Local 445 Freight Div. Pension v.

    Vacated on other grounds by In Re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, 725 F.3d 244 (2013)Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Petit v. United States Department of Education

    578 F. Supp. 2d 145 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2008

    Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . 2. The Court Denies the Motion to Dismiss 3 a.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Arunachalam v. International Business MacHines Corporation

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 28, 2021

    Walker v. Seldman, 471 F. Supp. 2d 106, 114 n. 12 (D.D.C. 2007) (quoting Arizona v. California, 530 U.S. 392, 412 (2000)); see accord Rosendahl v. Nixon, 360 Fed. Appx. 167, 168 (D.C. … Cir. 2010) (courts “may raise the res judicata preclusion defense sua sponte” ) (citing Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1285–86 (D.C. Cir. 2008)) (other citation omitted); see also Fenwick v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Potts v. Howard University Hospital

    623 F. Supp. 2d 68 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 2009

    Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F.Supp.2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C.1998) (citing Kuwait Airways Corp. v. Am. Sec. Bank, N.A., 890 F.2d 456 , 463 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.1989)). C. … See Combs v. W.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Monroe-Ricks v. U.S. Attorneys for D.C.

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 27, 2021

    Haase v. Sessions, 835 F.2d 902, 906 (D.C. Cir. 1987); see Lujan v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, the alleged wrongful actions are nebulous, at best.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lyles v. Hughes

    83 F. Supp. 3d 315 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2015

    Parole Comm’n, 429 F.3d 1098, 1104 (D.C.Cir.2005); see Brown v. Short, 729 F.Supp.2d 125, 132 (D.D.C.2010) (con-eluding that U.S. Marshals Service Detention Security Officer who followed U.S. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Fox v. Harris

    488 F. Supp. 488 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 25, 1980

    See Drennan v. Harris, 606 F.2d 846, 849 (9th Cir. 1979); Cervoni v. … This Board does not review controversies arising under Part B. 13 . For an account of the ongoing agency review of claims under count one, see Affidavit of John D.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Caesar v. United States

    258 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2003

    Robinson are employed in the office of the General Counsel for the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Upon certification by the U.S. Attorney General that Ms. … Lyon v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Organic Trade Association v. United States Department of Agriculture

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2019

    The “nine separate recommendations” of the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB or Board) cited in the Final OLPP Rule, 2 see id., … Dania Beach v. FAA, 628 F.3d 581, 590-91 (D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sara Lee Corporation v. American Bakers Association Retirement Plan

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2009

    Corp. v. … June 23, 1993) (affirming the conclusion of the PBGC Board of Appeals that a plan was an aggregate of single-employer plans and conducting the review by asking, after accepting the Board’s conclusion that the plan documents

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Miya Water Projects Netherlands B v.

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2023

    See Order, Menashe v. Covington & Burling, No. 21-7091 (D.C. Cir. … (quoting Gushlak v. Gushlak, 486 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ST. AGNES MEDICAL CENTER v. Sebelius

    628 F. Supp. 2d 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 25, 2009

    Hospitals may appeal the NPR to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (the “PRRB”) within 180 days. See 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo (a). … Ctr. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Malik v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2025

    Watch, Inc. v. CFPB, 60 F. … Blackwell v. FBI, 646 F.3d 37, 42 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (quoting Mayer Brown LLP v. IRS, 562 F.3d 1190, 1194 (D.C. Cir. 2009)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Johnson

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 2022

    Manrique v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1266, 1272 (2017) (quoting Henderson v. Shinseki, 562 U.S. 428, 435 (2011)). … Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152 (1984) (“[A]bsence of prejudice is a factor to be considered in determining whether the doctrine of equitable tolling should apply. . . .”).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Henok v. Chase Home Finance, LLC

    925 F. Supp. 2d 46 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 2013

    Brown v. FBI, 873 F. Supp. 2d 388, 408 (D.D.C. 2012) (quoting Wasserman v. Rodacker, Civil Action No. 06-1005 (RWR), 2007 WL 2071649, at *7 (D.D.C. July 18, 2007)). … Brown, 873 F. Supp. 2d at 408.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Sanders v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 2020

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … v. Ricks, 449 U.S. 250, 259 (1980)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Neuman v. United States of America

    70 F. Supp. 3d 416 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2014

    See, e.g., Brillhart v. FBI, 869 F. … Cottone v. Reno, 193 F.3d 550, 556 (D.C.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Bell v. Department of Defense

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2018

    Supp. 2d at 201 (citing Brown v. FBI, 675 F. Supp. 2d 122, 125–26 (D.D.C. 2009)). However, if the record “leaves substantial doubt as to the sufficiency of the search, summary judgment for the agency is not proper.” … Atchinson, 73 F.3d at 427 (holding that a delay of two years from filing of action is undue); Brown v. FBI, 744 F. Supp. 2d 120, 123 (D.D.C. 2010) (holding that a delay of two years is undue).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Simba v. Fenty

    754 F. Supp. 2d 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 7, 2010

    Only after the [agency] has notified the aggrieved person of its decision to dismiss or its inability to bring a civil action within the requisite time period can that person bring a civil action herself.’ ” Browne v. … See United States v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Select Specialty Hospital - Denver, Inc. v. Sebelius

    848 F. Supp. 2d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2012

    Harris v. … Smiley v. Citibank, 517 U.S. 735, 742 (1996); see also 4 F.C.C. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.