Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.89s
In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
287 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 2012
Surface Transportation Board Proceedings and 18 Class Action Lawsuits......15 C. … See Brown v. Kelly, 609 F.3d 467, 476 (2d Cir.2010) (“The Rule 23 requirements must be established by at least a preponderance of the evidence.”) (citing Teamsters Local 445 Freight Div. Pension v.
Vacated on other grounds by In Re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, 725 F.3d 244 (2013)Cited 32 timesPublishedPetit v. United States Department of Education
578 F. Supp. 2d 145 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2008
Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . 2. The Court Denies the Motion to Dismiss 3 a.
Cited 5 timesPublishedArunachalam v. International Business MacHines Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 28, 2021
Walker v. Seldman, 471 F. Supp. 2d 106, 114 n. 12 (D.D.C. 2007) (quoting Arizona v. California, 530 U.S. 392, 412 (2000)); see accord Rosendahl v. Nixon, 360 Fed. Appx. 167, 168 (D.C. … Cir. 2010) (courts “may raise the res judicata preclusion defense sua sponte” ) (citing Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1285–86 (D.C. Cir. 2008)) (other citation omitted); see also Fenwick v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPotts v. Howard University Hospital
623 F. Supp. 2d 68 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 2009
Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F.Supp.2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C.1998) (citing Kuwait Airways Corp. v. Am. Sec. Bank, N.A., 890 F.2d 456 , 463 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.1989)). C. … See Combs v. W.
Cited 18 timesPublishedMonroe-Ricks v. U.S. Attorneys for D.C.
District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 27, 2021
Haase v. Sessions, 835 F.2d 902, 906 (D.C. Cir. 1987); see Lujan v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, the alleged wrongful actions are nebulous, at best.
Cited 0 timesPublished83 F. Supp. 3d 315 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2015
Parole Comm’n, 429 F.3d 1098, 1104 (D.C.Cir.2005); see Brown v. Short, 729 F.Supp.2d 125, 132 (D.D.C.2010) (con-eluding that U.S. Marshals Service Detention Security Officer who followed U.S. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002).
Cited 9 timesPublished488 F. Supp. 488 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 25, 1980
See Drennan v. Harris, 606 F.2d 846, 849 (9th Cir. 1979); Cervoni v. … This Board does not review controversies arising under Part B. 13 . For an account of the ongoing agency review of claims under count one, see Affidavit of John D.
Cited 4 timesPublished258 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2003
Robinson are employed in the office of the General Counsel for the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Upon certification by the U.S. Attorney General that Ms. … Lyon v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedOrganic Trade Association v. United States Department of Agriculture
District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2019
The “nine separate recommendations” of the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB or Board) cited in the Final OLPP Rule, 2 see id., … Dania Beach v. FAA, 628 F.3d 581, 590-91 (D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSara Lee Corporation v. American Bakers Association Retirement Plan
District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2009
Corp. v. … June 23, 1993) (affirming the conclusion of the PBGC Board of Appeals that a plan was an aggregate of single-employer plans and conducting the review by asking, after accepting the Board’s conclusion that the plan documents
Cited 0 timesPublishedMiya Water Projects Netherlands B v.
District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2023
See Order, Menashe v. Covington & Burling, No. 21-7091 (D.C. Cir. … (quoting Gushlak v. Gushlak, 486 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedST. AGNES MEDICAL CENTER v. Sebelius
628 F. Supp. 2d 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 25, 2009
Hospitals may appeal the NPR to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (the “PRRB”) within 180 days. See 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo (a). … Ctr. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMalik v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2025
Watch, Inc. v. CFPB, 60 F. … Blackwell v. FBI, 646 F.3d 37, 42 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (quoting Mayer Brown LLP v. IRS, 562 F.3d 1190, 1194 (D.C. Cir. 2009)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 2022
Manrique v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1266, 1272 (2017) (quoting Henderson v. Shinseki, 562 U.S. 428, 435 (2011)). … Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152 (1984) (“[A]bsence of prejudice is a factor to be considered in determining whether the doctrine of equitable tolling should apply. . . .”).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHenok v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
925 F. Supp. 2d 46 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 2013
Brown v. FBI, 873 F. Supp. 2d 388, 408 (D.D.C. 2012) (quoting Wasserman v. Rodacker, Civil Action No. 06-1005 (RWR), 2007 WL 2071649, at *7 (D.D.C. July 18, 2007)). … Brown, 873 F. Supp. 2d at 408.
Cited 11 timesPublishedSanders v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 2020
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … v. Ricks, 449 U.S. 250, 259 (1980)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNeuman v. United States of America
70 F. Supp. 3d 416 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2014
See, e.g., Brillhart v. FBI, 869 F. … Cottone v. Reno, 193 F.3d 550, 556 (D.C.
Cited 21 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2018
Supp. 2d at 201 (citing Brown v. FBI, 675 F. Supp. 2d 122, 125–26 (D.D.C. 2009)). However, if the record “leaves substantial doubt as to the sufficiency of the search, summary judgment for the agency is not proper.” … Atchinson, 73 F.3d at 427 (holding that a delay of two years from filing of action is undue); Brown v. FBI, 744 F. Supp. 2d 120, 123 (D.D.C. 2010) (holding that a delay of two years is undue).
Cited 0 timesPublished754 F. Supp. 2d 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 7, 2010
Only after the [agency] has notified the aggrieved person of its decision to dismiss or its inability to bring a civil action within the requisite time period can that person bring a civil action herself.’ ” Browne v. … See United States v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedSelect Specialty Hospital - Denver, Inc. v. Sebelius
848 F. Supp. 2d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2012
Harris v. … Smiley v. Citibank, 517 U.S. 735, 742 (1996); see also 4 F.C.C. v.
Cited 13 timesPublished
Ask Donna