Case law

Stanley Co. of America, Inc. v. McLaughlin

195 F. Supp. 519 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 17, 1961

By this action against the individual members of the Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia, and J. J. … Crosby v. Moebs, 1932, 61 App.D.C. 42 , 57 F.2d 408 .

Wilson v. U.S. Department of Transportation

759 F. Supp. 2d 55 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 4, 2011

Exhaustion of administrative remedies, via the Office of Special Counsel and the Merit Service Protection Board, is required to maintain an action under the CSRA. Weaver v. U.S. … An employee can file a mixed case with either the agency’s EEO office or the Merit Service Protection Board, but not both. Butler v. West, 164 F.3d 634, 638 (D.C.Cir.1999).

Henok v. Chase Home Finance, LLC

925 F. Supp. 2d 46 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 2013

Brown v. FBI, 873 F. Supp. 2d 388, 408 (D.D.C. 2012) (quoting Wasserman v. Rodacker, Civil Action No. 06-1005 (RWR), 2007 WL 2071649, at *7 (D.D.C. July 18, 2007)). … Brown, 873 F. Supp. 2d at 408.

United States v. Taylor

272 F. Supp. 3d 127 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 9, 2017

Brown, No. … Brown, No. CR 09-358 (EGS), 2017 WL 1383640, at *8.

United States v. Sanford, Ltd.

859 F. Supp. 2d 102 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2012

Brown v. Entm’t Merchants Ass’n, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 2729, 2743 , 180 L.Ed.2d 708 (2011). … Brown, 2007 WL 2007513 , at *6.

Hartwell v. United States

353 F. Supp. 354 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 26, 1972

United States v. … Campbell v.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. U.S. Department of the Army

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 14, 2023

See, e.g., Town of Waterford v. N.Y. … McKinley, in applying the consultant corollary to discussions between the federal Board of the Federal Reserve and state Reserve Banks, emphasized that “the Board and Reserve Banks work[ed] together to assist in achieving

United States v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.

767 F. Supp. 308 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 1991

The intervenors point out that the test under traditional Supreme Court and other appellate decisions with respect to antitrust law involves “probabilities, not certainties.” 116 Brown Shoe Co. v. … In addition to its legal duty to follow that course, this judge is also mindful of the several district judges in various Southern states who, in the years following Brown v.

Wade v. Kerner

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 15, 2022

West v. Am. Fresh Foods, L.P., No. 7:10-91, 2011 WL 63563, at *1 (M.D. Ga. Jan. 4, 2011); see also Aamot v. … v.

Fox v. Harris

488 F. Supp. 488 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 25, 1980

See Drennan v. Harris, 606 F.2d 846, 849 (9th Cir. 1979); Cervoni v. … This Board does not review controversies arising under Part B. 13 . For an account of the ongoing agency review of claims under count one, see Affidavit of John D.

Subh v. Central Intelligence Agency

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 19, 2011

K-L (Letter from Plaintiff to the Privacy Act Review Board and Letter to Plaintiff from Steven A. … Raho, III, Chairman, Department of the Army Privacy Review Board, dated December 18, 2009, respectively).

Sara Lee Corporation v. American Bakers Association Retirement Plan

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2009

Corp. v. … June 23, 1993) (affirming the conclusion of the PBGC Board of Appeals that a plan was an aggregate of single-employer plans and conducting the review by asking, after accepting the Board’s conclusion that the plan documents

ST. AGNES MEDICAL CENTER v. Sebelius

628 F. Supp. 2d 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 25, 2009

Hospitals may appeal the NPR to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (the “PRRB”) within 180 days. See 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo (a). … Ctr. v.

Malik v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2025

Watch, Inc. v. CFPB, 60 F. … Blackwell v. FBI, 646 F.3d 37, 42 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (quoting Mayer Brown LLP v. IRS, 562 F.3d 1190, 1194 (D.C. Cir. 2009)).

United States v. Facebook, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 23, 2020

Def. v. Leavitt, 329 F. … (citing Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 838 (1985)).

Platt College of Commerce, Inc. v. Cavazos

796 F. Supp. 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 12, 1992

Pfizer, Inc. v. Heckler, 735 F.2d 1502, 1507 (D.C.Cir.1984). … Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, on behalf of Bushnell v. Cannelton Industries, Inc., 867 F.2d 1432, 1433, 1435 (D.C.Cir.1989); see also United States v.

Resources Corp. International v. Securities & Exchange Commission

24 F. Supp. 580 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 1938

I think that the instant case differs somewhat from the case of Jones v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 298 U. S. 1 , 56 S.Ct. 654 , 80 L.Ed. 1015 . … It would be a very extreme case that would justify a court to review an interlocutory order of another court or of a board with quasi judicial powers by an injunction to restrain further proceedings, where Congress has vested

de Guzman v. Gleason

234 F. Supp. 145 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 7, 1964

An administrative appeal was taken to the Board of Veterans Appeals, which rendered an opinion on August 30, 1956, denying the appeal. … In the more recent case of Milliken v.

Blue v. FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN

584 F. Supp. 2d 10 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 15, 2008

Downey v. Ambassador Devel., LLC, 568 F.Supp.2d 28, 30 (D.D.C. 2008) (citing Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. … (quoting Dixon v. Coburg Dairy, Inc., 369 F.3d 811, 815-16 (4th Cir.2004) (en banc)). See also Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M. St.

Simba v. Fenty

754 F. Supp. 2d 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 7, 2010

Only after the [agency] has notified the aggrieved person of its decision to dismiss or its inability to bring a civil action within the requisite time period can that person bring a civil action herself.’ ” Browne v. … See United States v.