Case law

Ivey v. Paulson

574 F. Supp. 2d 141 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 4, 2008

See, e.g., Ivey v. … Dep’t of Treasury, 107 Fed.Appx. 918 (Fed.Cir.2004) (per curiam) (affirming Merit Systems Protection Board’s decision that protected whistleblowing disclosures were not contributing factors to low quality ratings of plaintiffs

American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery v. Bowen

725 F. Supp. 606 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 28, 1989

Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307 , 96 S.Ct. 2562, 2563, 2566 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520 (1976); see also, City of New Orleans v. … See, e.g., Gibson Wine Co. v. Snyder, 194 F.2d 329, 331 (D.C.Cir.1952); Pickus v. United States Board of Parole, 507 F.2d 1107, 1113 (D.C.Cir.1974); Cabais v. Egger, 690 F.2d 234, 238 (D.C.Cir.1982); Whitney v.

United States v. Daigle

149 F. Supp. 409 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 1957

In Berger v. … Mogoll v. United States, 5 Cir., 158 F.2d 792, 793 , certiorari denied Perniciaro v.

SoundExchange, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.

65 F. Supp. 3d 150 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 26, 2014

Ass’n of Cruise Passengers v. Cunard Line, Ltd., 31 F.3d 1184, 1187 (D.C.Cir.1994). … The case shall be STAYED pending a decision by the Copyright Review Board. An appropriate order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. .

Alexander v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

186 F.R.D. 170 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 1999

Hinckley’s sole basis for these allegations of “improper motivations” was that his personal treatment team at the hospital had unanimously recommended his conditional release to the review board, but the review board did … V.

Monroe-Ricks v. U.S. Attorneys for D.C.

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 27, 2021

Haase v. Sessions, 835 F.2d 902, 906 (D.C. Cir. 1987); see Lujan v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, the alleged wrongful actions are nebulous, at best.

Continental Insurance Company v. Sandi Group, Inc.

804 F. Supp. 2d 59 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 19, 2011

American Ass’n of Cruise Passengers v. Cunard Line, Ltd., 31 F.3d 1184, 1186 (D.C. Cir. 1994), quoting Allnet Commc’ns Svc., Inc. v. Nat’l Exch. Carrier Ass’n, 965 F.2d 1118, 1120 (D.C. … Weber v. S.C. Lobeland Co., 28 BRBS 321, 1994 WL 712512, *9 (Nov. 29, 1994). But the D.C.

Saddler v. D'AMBROSIO

759 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 28, 1990

Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 , 109 S.Ct. 1865, 1873 , 104 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989). … Wirth v.

Pigford v. Veneman

89 F. Supp. 3d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2015

But USDA argues that the award should be reduced across-the-board by 75%: a 50% reduction due to Mr. … Thus, USDA requests an across-the-board reduction of 50% to achieve a “reasonable [fee] amount in relation to the results obtained.” Id. at 6.

Clark-Williams v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union

37 F. Supp. 3d 361 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 2014

The Court here, therefore, may rely on the Board of Arbitration’s Opinion, which Local 689 has attached to its Motion as Exhibit A, without converting the motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment. … See Atkinson v.

In Re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation - Mdl 1869

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 2015

Watt v. All Clear Business Solutions, LLC, 840 F. Supp. 2d 324, 326 (D.D.C. 2012) (quoting U.S. ex rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Ctrs. of Am., 576 F. Supp. 2d 128, 133 (D.D.C. 2008)). … (quoting Childers v. Slater, 197 F.R.D. 185, 188 (D.D.C. 2000)). “[W]hether to . . . reopen discovery is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court.” Childers v. Slater, 197 F.R.D. at 187.

Robinson v. Washington

302 F. Supp. 842 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 18, 1968

denied payments by the Department of Welfare pursuant to the “substitute parent” rule. (7) The “substitute parent” rule (EL 4.5 IV C of the Handbook) is a regulation which was never adopted by the former District of Columbia Board … On June 17, 1968 in the case of Stewart v.

United Government Security Officers of America, Local No. 52 v. Chertoff

587 F. Supp. 2d 209 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 24, 2008

Laningham v. U.S. … See, e.g., Davis Assocs., Inc. v.

United States v. Johnson

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 2022

Manrique v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1266, 1272 (2017) (quoting Henderson v. Shinseki, 562 U.S. 428, 435 (2011)). … Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152 (1984) (“[A]bsence of prejudice is a factor to be considered in determining whether the doctrine of equitable tolling should apply. . . .”).

United States v. Gregory

266 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 1967

Thirteen years earlier, in United States v. … Goldsby v. United States, 160 U.S. 70 , 16 S.Ct. 216 , 40 L. Ed. 343 (1895) ; Gordon v. United States, 53 App.D.C. 154 , 289 F. 552 (1923); United States v.

Legg v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 9, 2017

Gonzalez v. Thaler, –– U.S. ––, 132 S. Ct. 641, 648 (2012); Doe ex rel. Fein v. District of Columbia, 93 F.3d 861, 871 (D.C. Cir. 1996). … See Brown v. Jewell, 134 F.

Hodgkins v. Holder

677 F. Supp. 2d 202 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 5, 2010

In Parker v. … While Judge Brown criticized the Navegar standard in dissent, see id. at 19, the majority applied the existing standard without comment. 3 . Plaintiffs suggest that Fraternal Order of Police v.

Isaac v. Samuels

132 F. Supp. 3d 56 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2015

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Akers v. Watts, 740 F.Supp.2d 83, 96-97 (D.D.C. 2010) (citing Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 356 (1996)).

Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia

668 F. Supp. 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 1987

In Murphy v. … In Board of Sup’rs of Fairfax County, Va. v.

Kung v. Democratic National Committee

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 20, 2025

See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … See Shatsky v. Palestine Liberation Org., 955 F.3d 1016, 1038 (D.C. Cir. 2020).