Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

1.59s

  • Walpin v. Corporation for National and Community Services

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 17, 2010

    and exhibited other behavior that led the Board to question his capacity to serve” as Inspector General. … Oliver v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Norris v. Salazar

    885 F. Supp. 2d 402 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 17, 2012

    Hester, in prior proceedings before the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). … Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. Cir. 1985) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Miller v. Rosenker, 578 F.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Dismukes v. Department of Interior

    603 F. Supp. 760 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 1984

    Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 , 290 n. 10, 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 1712 n. 10, 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979), quoting Dep’t of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 361 , 96 S.Ct. 1592, 1599 , 48 L.Ed.2d 11 (1976); see also Allen v. … Washington Post Co., 456 U.S. 595 , 102 S.Ct. 1957 , 72 L.Ed.2d 358 (1982); Breuhaus v. IRS, 609 F.2d 80 (2d Cir.1979); Zale Corp. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • United States v. Ali

    870 F. Supp. 2d 10 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 2012

    Evid. 403; see United States v. Brown, 597 F.3d 399, 406 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (“‘[T]he Rule 403 inquiry in each case involving Rule 404(b) evidence will be case- specific. … Witnesses observed Ali in possession of a laptop computer when he boarded the ship. Witnesses observed him using the laptop computer when he boarded the ship.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Huntington v. United States Department of Commerce

    266 F. Supp. 3d 264 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 2017

    See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). … The Court pointed out that “earlier emails submitted by Huntington . . . suggest[ed] that SAWS reports were in fact sent to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (the precursor to the PTAB) and that the Board was

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Brennan

    144 F. Supp. 3d 121 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2015

    Id. at 469 (citing Wilson v. Pena, 79 F.3d 154 (D.C. Cir. 1996), and Houseton v. … Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151 (D.C.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Electrical Contractors Ass'n of the District of Columbia, Inc. v. McLaughlin

    153 F. Supp. 653 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 1957

    This action seeks a declaratory judgment or an injunction against the Board of Commissioners, District of Columbia, under the jurisdiction of this court’s equity powers and Title 28, Section 2201, of the United States Code … Dunigan, Inc., v. District of Columbia, 59 App.D.C. 384 , 44 F.2d 892 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Safeway Stores, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union

    621 F. Supp. 1233 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 1985

    Morgan Services, Inc. v. Local 323, Chicago and Central States Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union, 724 F.2d 1217, 1224 (6th Cir.1984); see Washington Hospital Center v. … Local 323, Chicago and Central States Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union, 724 F.2d at 1222 n. 8; see also Local Union 59, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Keeffe v. Library of Congress

    588 F. Supp. 778 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 16, 1984

    Letter Carriers, 413 U.S. at 564 , 93 S.Ct. at 2890 (quoting Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968)). … See, e.g., Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576-78 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2708-09 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In Re the Baan Co. Securities Litigation

    103 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 2000

    Bell v. … Paul Baan, Grabe, and Hodgson were members of the Board of Directors, although not company officers.

    Cited 67 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Government of the District of Columbia

    19 F. Supp. 3d 281 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 20, 2014

    Brown Termination Letter at 1. After exhausting his administrative remedies, Mr. … Martinez v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • United States v. Kuch

    288 F. Supp. 439 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 1968

    West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 639 , 63 S.Ct. 1178, 1186 , 87 L.Ed.. 1628 (1943). … It now appears from a reading of such cases as Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961); Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 , 83 S.Ct. 1790 , 10 L.Ed.2d 965 (1963); and United States, v.

    Cited 63 timesPublished
  • Washington Regional Medicorp v. Sebelius

    72 F. Supp. 3d 159 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 2014

    It timely appealed the NPRs to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board, which affirmed CMS’s calculation of the reimbursements. Compl. ¶¶ 29–32. The Board also certified the dispute for expedited judicial review. … Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • De Lano v. United States

    183 F. Supp. 781 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 25, 1959

    An appeal to the Veterans Administration was duly noted, and on July 15, 1958, the Board of Veterans’ Appeals denied the appeal. This action followed. … Sison v. Ambalada, 30 Phil. 118 , 124.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Patterson v. White

    51 F.R.D. 175 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 1970

    The liberal construction is illustrated by cases such as Meredith v. United Air Lines, 41 F.R.D. 34 (S.D.Cal.1966). … While Lockheed had never been served or contacted in any way by the plaintiff, the Court found that they were aware of the plaintiff’s injuries because they had participated in a hearing held by the Civil Aeronautics Board

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Kirkham v. Société Air France

    236 F.R.D. 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 13, 2006

    Brown v. Best Foods, 169 F.R.D. 385 , 388 n. 3 (N.D.Ala.1996). … Gomez v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Short v. Chertoff

    555 F. Supp. 2d 166 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 27, 2008

    Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999); Stewart v. Ashcroft, 352 F.3d 422, 428 (D.C.Cir.2003); Carroll v. England, 321 F.Supp.2d 58, 68 (D.D.C.2004). … See, e.g., Brown v. Koester Envtl. Servs., Inc., 78 Fed.Appx. 719, 719 (D.C.Cir.2003) (affirming judgment for defendant where plaintiff failed to cast doubt on defendant’s nondiscriminatory justifications); Brown v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Cook v. District of Columbia

    115 F. Supp. 3d 98 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2015

    See, e.g., Thomas v. … Brown v. D.C., No. 14-1405 (RC), 2015 WL 690928, at *8 (D.D.C. Feb. 19, 2015).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Sierra v. Hayden

    254 F. Supp. 3d 230 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2017

    Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832 (1976). The administrative procedure that one must follow to seek relief from the Library of Congress (“LOC”) is different from most federal agencies. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.103(d)(3). … See Mondy v. Sec’y of the Army, 845 F.2d 1051, 1058 n.3 (D.C. Cir. 1988) (MacKinnon, J., concurring) (citing Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. Cir. 1985)); see also Bowden v. United States, 106 F.3d 433, 437 (D.C.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • United States v. Winston

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 2020

    Winston retains a litigable interest in challenging the date he appears before the parole board. … Given that record, Winston flunks § 3553 across the board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.