Case law

Spawr Optical Research, Inc. v. Baldrige

649 F. Supp. 1366 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 16, 1986

United States v. … The Board upheld the discharge, and the Court of Appeals upheld the Board’s action. Id. at 278 .

United States v. Laureys

103 F. Supp. 3d 69 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 8, 2015

Id.; see also Cullen v. … In 2014 — four years after this Court, Judge Robertson presiding, issued the jury instructions in question here — the Circuit largely adopted the rationale underlying Judge Brown’s dissent. See United States v.

Touarsi v. United States Department of Justice

78 F. Supp. 3d 332 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 23, 2015

An Immigration Judge denied Touarsi’s asylum application while he was detained, but Touarsi successfully appealed that decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals, obtained asylum, and was released. Id. ¶¶ 18–20. … Mayer Brown LLP v. IRS, 562 F.3d 1190, 1194 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (quoting PHE, Inc. v. DOJ, 983 F.2d 248, 251 (D.C. Cir. 1993)).

Miller v. U.S. International Development Cooperation Agency

818 F. Supp. 390 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 1993

See NAACP v. Secretary of HUD, 817 F.2d 149, 157-60 (1st Cir.1987); Iowa ex rel. Miller v. Block, 771 F.2d 347, 349 (8th Cir.1985). Indeed, in Califano v. … The administrative law judge decided against plaintiff on the merits; the Board held that it lacked jurisdiction. .

Blackman v. District of Columbia

321 F. Supp. 2d 99 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 9, 2004

X v. … See Schneider v.

Eig Energy Fund Xiv, L.P. v. Petroleo Brasileiro S.A

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 8, 2022

Republic of Arg. v. … Carleton v.

Bates v. Rumsfeld

271 F. Supp. 2d 54 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 30, 2002

Lampkin v. Connor, 360 F.2d 505, 509 (D.C.Cir.1966); Atlas Air, Inc. v. … Ecology, Inc. v.

Forbes v. Harker

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 5, 2022

To the extent that the immediate custodian rule applies in this context, it is unclear here whether the Parole Board, see Guerra v. Meese, 786 F.2d 414, 417 (D.C. … Specifically, in United States v.

Ezeah v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2025

Mayer Brown LLP v. IRS, 562 F.3d 1190, 1193 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (emphasis in original). … Id.; Mayer Brown, 562 F.3d at 1193 (emphasis omitted). But the agency also should discuss foreseeable harm as a “distinct, consecutive inquir[y].” Leopold v. Dep’t of Justice, 94 F.4th 33, 37 (D.C. Cir. 2024); Reps.

Walpin v. Corporation for National and Community Services

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 17, 2010

and exhibited other behavior that led the Board to question his capacity to serve” as Inspector General. … Oliver v.

United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

327 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 9, 2004

Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation (individually and as successor by merger to the American Tobacco Company), Lorillard Tobacco Company, Altria Group Inc. … See United States v. Reid, 533 F.2d 1255 , 1260 n. 19 (D.C.Cir.1976); United States v. Diggs, 613 F.2d 988, 1002-03 (D.C.Cir.1979); United States v. Godwin, 272 F.3d 659, 666-67 (4th Cir.2001). 5 .

Huntington v. United States Department of Commerce

266 F. Supp. 3d 264 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 2017

See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). … The Court pointed out that “earlier emails submitted by Huntington . . . suggest[ed] that SAWS reports were in fact sent to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (the precursor to the PTAB) and that the Board was

Norris v. Salazar

885 F. Supp. 2d 402 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 17, 2012

Hester, in prior proceedings before the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). … Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. Cir. 1985) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Miller v. Rosenker, 578 F.

Morgan Development Laboratories, Inc. v. Watson

188 F. Supp. 89 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 24, 1960

The Board of Examiners held that Bustanoby alone does not teach the use of mirrors for viewing purposes and the particular manner of mounting them on the disc. … In dealing with a foreign patent we must bear in mind the principle often laid down by the courts and recently applied by this Court in General Tire and Rubber Co. v.

Dr Pepper/Seven-Up Companies, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

798 F. Supp. 762 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 20, 1992

Tarpeh-Doe v. United States, 904 F.2d 719, 722 (D.C.Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 955 , 112 L.Ed,2d 1043 (1991); see also Board of Regents v. … See Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 316-23 , 82 S.Ct. at 1519-23 ; FTC v. PPG Indus., Inc., 798 F.2d 1500, 1501 (D.C.Cir.1986).

Cook v. District of Columbia

115 F. Supp. 3d 98 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2015

See, e.g., Thomas v. … Brown v. D.C., No. 14-1405 (RC), 2015 WL 690928, at *8 (D.D.C. Feb. 19, 2015).

In Re the Baan Co. Securities Litigation

103 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 2000

Bell v. … Paul Baan, Grabe, and Hodgson were members of the Board of Directors, although not company officers.

Seifert v. Winter

555 F. Supp. 2d 3 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 3, 2008

that copy is from the 2000 edition of the manual, which would have been the version of the manual in effect when the Board of Inquiry convened in 2001. … Dingle v.

Washington, Jr. v. Alliedbarton Security Services, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 5, 2018

See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … Plaintiff apparently then filed a charge with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”), challenging the SEIU’s refusal to arbitrate against AlliedBarton.

Lee v. Government of the District of Columbia

19 F. Supp. 3d 281 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 20, 2014

Brown Termination Letter at 1. After exhausting his administrative remedies, Mr. … Martinez v.