Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

4.17s

  • Clark-Williams v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union

    37 F. Supp. 3d 361 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 2014

    The Court here, therefore, may rely on the Board of Arbitration’s Opinion, which Local 689 has attached to its Motion as Exhibit A, without converting the motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment. … See Atkinson v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • G v. Fay Sch., Inc.

    282 F. Supp. 3d 381 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2017

    United States v. Zolot , 968 F.Supp.2d 411 , 417 (D. Mass. 2013). As the First Circuit instructed in Ruiz-Troche v. … In Milward v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Dunning v. Ware

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 2017

    The second highest scoring candidate was Roselyn Brown (“Brown”), who scored 39 out of 60. Ia’. Plaintiff scored 19 out of 60, which placed him as the sixth highest scoring candidate out of seven applicants Id. at 20. … See, e.g., Washington v. Chao, 577 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Federal National Mortgage Ass'n Securities, Derivative, & "ERISA" Litigation

    905 F. Supp. 2d 63 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 2012

    See Novak v. … V.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Gibson

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 2018

    Gross, 784 F.3d at 789 (Brown, J., concurring). … (Brown, J., dissenting)(emphasis added).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pautsch v. Islamic Republic of Iran

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2024

    See, e.g., Selig v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 573 F. … Despite agreeing with Plaintiffs’ characterization of the caselaw, see, e.g., Estate of Brown v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 872 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Baloch v. Norton

    355 F. Supp. 2d 246 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 2005

    The Early Years (1991-2000) The plaintiff is a “brown-skinned” Muslim from Pakistan and over seventy years old. … Reeves, 530 U.S. at 142 , 120 S.Ct. 2097 ; Brown, 199 F.3d at 452 .

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Griffin

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2010

    Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 456 (D.C. Cir. 1999). In other words, "not everything that makes an employee unhappy is an actionable adverse action." Russell v. Principi, 257 F.3d 815, 818 (D.C. … Jones v. Bernanke, 557 F.3d 670,678 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barnabas v. University of the District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 2010

    Civil Action No. 07-02207 (JDB) THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. … Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ivey v. Paulson

    574 F. Supp. 2d 141 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 4, 2008

    See, e.g., Ivey v. … Dep’t of Treasury, 107 Fed.Appx. 918 (Fed.Cir.2004) (per curiam) (affirming Merit Systems Protection Board’s decision that protected whistleblowing disclosures were not contributing factors to low quality ratings of plaintiffs

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Congressional Hunger Center v. Gurey

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 2018

    Boland v. Elite Terrazzo Flooring, Inc., 763 F. Supp. 2d 64, 67 (D.D.C. 2011) (quoting Jackson v. Beech, 636 F.2d 831, 835 (D.C. Cir. 1980)). … Jacobson v. Hofgard, 168 F. Supp. 3d 187, 195 (D.D.C. 2016) (quoting Sundberg v. TTR Realty, LLC, 109 A.3d 1123, 1130 (D.C. 2015)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kowal v. United States Department of Justice

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 2021

    (quoting Mayer Brown LLP v. IRS, 562 F.3d 1190, 1194 (D.C. Cir. 2009)). … As outlined in Mayer Brown, 562 F.3d at 1193, the exemption is properly applied to information that “could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Delgado v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

    727 F. Supp. 24 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 1989

    See Mandelkorn v. Patrick, 359 F.Supp. 692 (D.D.C.1973). As stated in Hoffman v. Halden, 268 F.2d 280 (9th Cir.1959), overruled in part on other grounds, Cohen v. … Although a pro se litigant is entitled to some leeway when a court reviews the sufficiency of the allegations in his complaint to support a claim for relief, Brown v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • In Re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation - Mdl 1869

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 2015

    Watt v. All Clear Business Solutions, LLC, 840 F. Supp. 2d 324, 326 (D.D.C. 2012) (quoting U.S. ex rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Ctrs. of Am., 576 F. Supp. 2d 128, 133 (D.D.C. 2008)). … (quoting Childers v. Slater, 197 F.R.D. 185, 188 (D.D.C. 2000)). “[W]hether to . . . reopen discovery is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court.” Childers v. Slater, 197 F.R.D. at 187.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Facebook, Inc.

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 23, 2020

    Def. v. Leavitt, 329 F. … (citing Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 838 (1985)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Brennan

    144 F. Supp. 3d 121 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2015

    Id. at 469 (citing Wilson v. Pena, 79 F.3d 154 (D.C. Cir. 1996), and Houseton v. … Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151 (D.C.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dye v. Pompeo

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 14, 2019

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 557 (2007)). … However, the Court notes that the test in Browning-Ferris “is not terribly distinct from the primary consideration in the Spirides test.” Dean v. Am. Fed’n of Gov’t Employees, Local 476, 549 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Varicon International v. Office of Personnel Management

    934 F. Supp. 440 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 1996

    In Webster v. … Steinthal & Co. v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Subh v. Central Intelligence Agency

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 19, 2011

    K-L (Letter from Plaintiff to the Privacy Act Review Board and Letter to Plaintiff from Steven A. … Raho, III, Chairman, Department of the Army Privacy Review Board, dated December 18, 2009, respectively).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Spawr Optical Research, Inc. v. Baldrige

    649 F. Supp. 1366 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 16, 1986

    United States v. … The Board upheld the discharge, and the Court of Appeals upheld the Board’s action. Id. at 278 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.