Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.17s
Clark-Williams v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union
37 F. Supp. 3d 361 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 2014
The Court here, therefore, may rely on the Board of Arbitration’s Opinion, which Local 689 has attached to its Motion as Exhibit A, without converting the motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment. … See Atkinson v.
Cited 3 timesPublished282 F. Supp. 3d 381 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2017
United States v. Zolot , 968 F.Supp.2d 411 , 417 (D. Mass. 2013). As the First Circuit instructed in Ruiz-Troche v. … In Milward v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 2017
The second highest scoring candidate was Roselyn Brown (“Brown”), who scored 39 out of 60. Ia’. Plaintiff scored 19 out of 60, which placed him as the sixth highest scoring candidate out of seven applicants Id. at 20. … See, e.g., Washington v. Chao, 577 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn Re Federal National Mortgage Ass'n Securities, Derivative, & "ERISA" Litigation
905 F. Supp. 2d 63 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 2012
See Novak v. … V.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 2018
Gross, 784 F.3d at 789 (Brown, J., concurring). … (Brown, J., dissenting)(emphasis added).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPautsch v. Islamic Republic of Iran
District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2024
See, e.g., Selig v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 573 F. … Despite agreeing with Plaintiffs’ characterization of the caselaw, see, e.g., Estate of Brown v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 872 F.
Cited 0 timesPublished355 F. Supp. 2d 246 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 2005
The Early Years (1991-2000) The plaintiff is a “brown-skinned” Muslim from Pakistan and over seventy years old. … Reeves, 530 U.S. at 142 , 120 S.Ct. 2097 ; Brown, 199 F.3d at 452 .
Cited 31 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2010
Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 456 (D.C. Cir. 1999). In other words, "not everything that makes an employee unhappy is an actionable adverse action." Russell v. Principi, 257 F.3d 815, 818 (D.C. … Jones v. Bernanke, 557 F.3d 670,678 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBarnabas v. University of the District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 2010
Civil Action No. 07-02207 (JDB) THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. … Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)).
Cited 0 timesPublished574 F. Supp. 2d 141 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 4, 2008
See, e.g., Ivey v. … Dep’t of Treasury, 107 Fed.Appx. 918 (Fed.Cir.2004) (per curiam) (affirming Merit Systems Protection Board’s decision that protected whistleblowing disclosures were not contributing factors to low quality ratings of plaintiffs
Cited 4 timesPublishedCongressional Hunger Center v. Gurey
District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 2018
Boland v. Elite Terrazzo Flooring, Inc., 763 F. Supp. 2d 64, 67 (D.D.C. 2011) (quoting Jackson v. Beech, 636 F.2d 831, 835 (D.C. Cir. 1980)). … Jacobson v. Hofgard, 168 F. Supp. 3d 187, 195 (D.D.C. 2016) (quoting Sundberg v. TTR Realty, LLC, 109 A.3d 1123, 1130 (D.C. 2015)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedKowal v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 2021
(quoting Mayer Brown LLP v. IRS, 562 F.3d 1190, 1194 (D.C. Cir. 2009)). … As outlined in Mayer Brown, 562 F.3d at 1193, the exemption is properly applied to information that “could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedDelgado v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
727 F. Supp. 24 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 1989
See Mandelkorn v. Patrick, 359 F.Supp. 692 (D.D.C.1973). As stated in Hoffman v. Halden, 268 F.2d 280 (9th Cir.1959), overruled in part on other grounds, Cohen v. … Although a pro se litigant is entitled to some leeway when a court reviews the sufficiency of the allegations in his complaint to support a claim for relief, Brown v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedIn Re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation - Mdl 1869
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 2015
Watt v. All Clear Business Solutions, LLC, 840 F. Supp. 2d 324, 326 (D.D.C. 2012) (quoting U.S. ex rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Ctrs. of Am., 576 F. Supp. 2d 128, 133 (D.D.C. 2008)). … (quoting Childers v. Slater, 197 F.R.D. 185, 188 (D.D.C. 2000)). “[W]hether to . . . reopen discovery is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court.” Childers v. Slater, 197 F.R.D. at 187.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Facebook, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 23, 2020
Def. v. Leavitt, 329 F. … (citing Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 838 (1985)).
Cited 0 timesPublished144 F. Supp. 3d 121 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2015
Id. at 469 (citing Wilson v. Pena, 79 F.3d 154 (D.C. Cir. 1996), and Houseton v. … Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151 (D.C.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Nov 14, 2019
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 557 (2007)). … However, the Court notes that the test in Browning-Ferris “is not terribly distinct from the primary consideration in the Spirides test.” Dean v. Am. Fed’n of Gov’t Employees, Local 476, 549 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedVaricon International v. Office of Personnel Management
934 F. Supp. 440 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 1996
In Webster v. … Steinthal & Co. v.
Cited 33 timesPublishedSubh v. Central Intelligence Agency
District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 19, 2011
K-L (Letter from Plaintiff to the Privacy Act Review Board and Letter to Plaintiff from Steven A. … Raho, III, Chairman, Department of the Army Privacy Review Board, dated December 18, 2009, respectively).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSpawr Optical Research, Inc. v. Baldrige
649 F. Supp. 1366 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 16, 1986
United States v. … The Board upheld the discharge, and the Court of Appeals upheld the Board’s action. Id. at 278 .
Cited 14 timesPublished
Ask Donna