Case law

Powell v. American Federation of Teachers

883 F. Supp. 2d 183 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2012

See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 561 (1992). … Under the CMPA, an employee must first bring a grievance to the District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board (“PERB”). See Lightfoot v.

Washington Regional Medicorp v. Sebelius

72 F. Supp. 3d 159 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 2014

It timely appealed the NPRs to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board, which affirmed CMS’s calculation of the reimbursements. Compl. ¶¶ 29–32. The Board also certified the dispute for expedited judicial review. … Co. v.

City of Pleasant Grove v. United States

623 F. Supp. 782 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 25, 1985

Stout v. Jefferson County Board of Education, C.A. No. 65-396 (N.D.Ala.1969). . … Stout v. Jefferson County Board of Education, No. 72-1102, aff’d, 466 F.2d 1213 (5th Cir.1972). .

United States v. Alexander

755 F. Supp. 448 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 4, 1991

Brown, 671 F.2d 585 (D.C.Cir.1982). However, the presence of probable cause to arrest, when the police have not effected an arrest, permits a more limited search than that permitted incident to arrest. See Cupp v. … United States, 389 F.2d 305 (D.C.Cir.1967), United States v. Brown, 463 F.2d 949 (D.C.Cir.1972), or Doe v. Chicago, 580 F.Supp. 146, 151 (N.D.Ill.1983).

Lucas v. District of Columbia

683 F. Supp. 2d 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 2, 2010

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). A complaint must present “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face” and “above the speculative level.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. … Torrence v.

Ferguson v. Wainwright

849 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2012

Sutherland v. McCall, 709 F.2d 730, 732 (D.C. Cir. 1983); see Vactor v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 815 F. Supp. 2d 81, 83 (D.D.C. 2011), quoting Hill v. Johnston, 750 F. … “Furthermore, it is not the function of the courts to review the discretion of the Board in the denial of applications for parole, or to repass on the credibility of reports and information received by the Board in making

Smith v. Horner

664 F. Supp. 576 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 1987

Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization, 426 U.S. 26, 37 , 96 S.Ct. 1917, 1924 , 48 L.Ed.2d 450 (1976). See also, e.g., Safir v. Dole, 718 F.2d 475 (D.C.Cir.1983). … Golden v. Zwickler, 394 U.S. 103, 108 , 89 S.Ct. 956, 959 , 22 L.Ed.2d 113 (1969).

United States v. Dorn

169 F. Supp. 144 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 19, 1959

Three witnesses, not related to the defendant, testified at the trial that the defendant boarded a bus shortly before the robbery. … Edwards v. United States, 1958, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 152 , 256 F.2d 707 ; Mitchell v. United States, D.C.Cir., 1958, 259 F.2d 787 , certiorari denied 79 S.Ct. 81 . 2.

Weng v. Solis

960 F. Supp. 2d 239 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2013

Brown v. … See also Santa Cruz v. Snow, 402 F.

Warner

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 2018

Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972); Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008), plaintiff’s allegations in this case neither present a “federal question suitable for decision,” Best v. … See Matthew v.

Azeez v. Murphy

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 23, 2024

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Under Rule 12(b)(1), the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. See Lujan v. … Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 (citation omitted). III.

Alzokari v. Department of State

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 7, 2021

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). A complaint should state a “short plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. of Civ. Proc. 8(a)(2). … Co. v. Twombly, 550 US 544, 555-56 (2007); Arpaio v. Obama, 797 F.3d 11, 19 (D.C. Cir. 2015); Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 US 662, 677-78 (2009).

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. U.S. Department of the Treasury

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 2, 2022

Citizen, Inc. v. OMB, 598 F.3d 865, 876 (D.C. … USPS3 was created by the office responsible for managing mail initiatives and presented to the Board of Governors and other executive leaders. Id.

Ash v. Reilly

433 F. Supp. 2d 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2006

United States v. Alexander, 331 F.3d 116, 122 (D.C.Cir.2003) (quoting United States v. Brown, 254 F.3d 454, 458 (3d Cir.2001)). … See Fed.R.Evid. 803 advisory committee’s notes, 1972 proposed rules, ¶ 3 (all hearsay exception delineated in Rule 803 require firsthand knowledge); see also Brown v.

Saunders v. District of Columbia

711 F. Supp. 2d 42 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 13, 2010

See Brown v. United States, 742 F.2d 1498, 1501 (D.C.Cir.1984). 11 . Plaintiff, in her Supplemental Memorandum, actually cites to D.C.Code § 12-301(8). … Lottery and Charitable Games Control Board.”).

United States v. Segers

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA - UNITED S_TATES OF AMERICA, V. Case No. 1:17-cr-00224-KBJ VERSIE SEGERS, Defendant. … On December 12, 2017; the Honorable Ketanji Brown Jackson,v United States District Judge,. referred this case, nunc pro tunc, to the undersigned for purposes of determining Defendant’s competency.

Scott v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 2025

Marx v. Gen. Revenue Corp., 568 U.S. 371, 377 (2013). … Scott displayed on foam boards as demonstrative aids. Opp’n at 2. The Court agrees that these costs are not taxable.

In Re Save More Foods, Inc.

96 B.R. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 1989

See, e.g., Key v. … See Brock v.

Wehr-Darroca v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2025

Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, 155 (1990) (quoting Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 101–02 (1983)). … Cir. 2009) (Brown, J., dissenting in part) (calling on the en banc D.C. Circuit to “overrule Navegar”); Seegars v. Gonzales, 413 F.3d 1, 2 (D.C.

Miller v. U.S. International Development Cooperation Agency

818 F. Supp. 390 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 1993

See NAACP v. Secretary of HUD, 817 F.2d 149, 157-60 (1st Cir.1987); Iowa ex rel. Miller v. Block, 771 F.2d 347, 349 (8th Cir.1985). Indeed, in Califano v. … The administrative law judge decided against plaintiff on the merits; the Board held that it lacked jurisdiction. .