Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

3.22s

  • Consumers Union of U. S., Inc. v. Rogers

    352 F. Supp. 1319 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 1973

    United States v. National Lead Co., 63 F.Supp. 513 (S.D.N.Y.1945), aff’d, 332 U.S. 319 , 67 S.Ct. 1634 , 91 L.Ed. 2077 (1947); see also, United States v. … Defendants cite Parker v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Chansley

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2024

    United States v. Chansley, 525 F. Supp. 3d 151, 155 (D.D.C. 2021). … United States v. Farrell, 606 F.2d 1341, 1347 (D.C. Cir. 1979); see also United States v. Brown, 185 F. Supp. 3d 79, 82 (D.D.C. 2016) (“The D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Amex Systems, Inc. v. Cardenas

    519 F. Supp. 537 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 1981

    In Abbott Laboratories v. … See Eastern Canvas Products v. Brown, 580 F.2d 675 (D.C.Cir.1978).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Watson

    169 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 1959

    In re Edison, 30 App.D.C. 321 ; Weeks v. Warp, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 235 , 221 F.2d 108 . The principal claim involved in this action is Claim 2, which covers the com *852 pound. … The applicant, however, chose instead of amending his claims after thé Examiner rejected the earlier application, to appeal vj;o the Board of Appeals? which affirmed the Examiner’s decision.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Taylor

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 20, 2022

    United States v. Moon, 718 F.2d 1210, 1234 (2d Cir. 1983) (citations omitted); see also United States v. … Harris v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization v. Bond

    477 F. Supp. 62 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 1979

    In Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. … In Spokane, Portland and Seattle v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • East Bay Municipal Utility District v. United States Department of Commerce

    948 F. Supp. 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 4, 1996

    In 1942, local draft boards began granting occupational deferments for essential workers. … V.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Simon v. United States

    587 F. Supp. 1029 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 17, 1984

    Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 744 (D.C.Cir.1979). Moving to the second and third factors, the court finds that plaintiffs were not motivated by commercial gain in their FOIA action, which cuts in their favor. … See Baldrige v. Shapiro, 455 U.S. 345 , 360 n. 14, 102 S.Ct. 1103 , 1112 n. 14, 71 L.Ed.2d 199 (1982); NLRB v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Rodriguez v. United States Department of Treasury

    131 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 1990

    See Selzer v. Board of Educ., 113 F.R.D. 165, 167 (S.D.N.Y.1986) (citing General Tel. Co. of Southwest v. Falcon, 457 U.S. 147 , 157 n. 13, 102 S.Ct. 2364 , 2370 n. 13, 72 L.Ed.2d 740 (1982)). *8 2. … Daubert v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Waterview Management Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

    257 F. Supp. 2d 31 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2003

    After the remand of this case from the Court of Appeals, see Waterview Management Co. v. … This provision has been interpreted by the Sixth Circuit, in RTC v. Cheshire Mgmt.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wagner v. Reynolds

    241 F. Supp. 910 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 1965

    Claims 10 and 21, considered illustrative by the Board of Appeals, read as follows: 10. … Abbot et al. v. Coe, 71 U.S.App.D.C. 195 , 109 F.2d 449 (1939).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lucas v. District of Columbia

    683 F. Supp. 2d 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 2, 2010

    Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). A complaint must present “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face” and “above the speculative level.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. … Torrence v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Holdzclaw Ex Rel. A.H. v. District of Columbia

    524 F. Supp. 2d 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 5, 2007

    Board of Educ. Of Hendrick Hudson Central School Dist. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 206 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982). … Paolella v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Fawkes

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 21, 2025

    It appears from the complaint that Smith’s name nonetheless appeared on the ballot after a vote by the board of elections. … Beckford v. Esper, No. 18-cv-940, 2018 WL 4778930, at *1 (D.D.C. Oct. 3, 2018) (quoting Pendleton v. Mukasey, 552 F. Supp. 2d 14, 17 (D.D.C. 2008)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bowles v. Dixie Cab Ass'n

    113 F. Supp. 324 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 1953

    the Act provides: “The period of military service shall not be included in computing any period now or hereafter to be limited by any law, regulation, or order for the bringing of any action or proceeding in any court, board … Maier v. Independent Taxi Owner’s Ass’n, 68 U.S.App.D.C. 307, 96 F.2d 579, 582 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • In Re Save More Foods, Inc.

    96 B.R. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 1989

    See, e.g., Key v. … See Brock v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Young v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2022

    (“the Board”). 1 Plain- tiffs, who have significant industry experience, sought membership on both the Committee and the Board but ultimately were not selected when the new members were announced in June 2021. … Young had served on the Board but not the Committee; Dr. Cox had served on both the Committee and the Board. Id.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hyatt v. Matal

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 23, 2020

    See Hyatt v. Iancu, No. 18-2390, et al. (Fed. Cir. argued Feb. 6, 2020). 3 At the time, the Board was known as the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. See Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L. … Hosps., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Whitlock v. Donovan

    598 F. Supp. 126 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 1984

    See, e.g., Tinch v. Walters, 573 F.Supp. 346, 348 (E.D.Tenn.1983); Simpson v. Reynolds Metals Co., 629 F.2d 1226, 1228 , 1231 n. 8 (7th Cir.1980); Davis v. Bucher, 451 F.Supp. 791, 796 (E.D.Pa.1978). … See Doe v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Woodward v. Rogers

    344 F. Supp. 974 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 1972

    See Allen v. State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 , 89 S.Ct. 817 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 (1969); Phillips v. United States, 312 U.S. 246 , 61 S.Ct. 480 , 85 L.Ed. 800 (1941). … Cole v. Richardson, 405 U.S. at 678 , 92 S.Ct. at 1334 . See also Biklen v. Board of Education, 406 U.S. 951 , 92 S.Ct. 2060 , 32 L.Ed.2d 340 (1972).

    Cited 21 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.