Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.22s
Consumers Union of U. S., Inc. v. Rogers
352 F. Supp. 1319 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 1973
United States v. National Lead Co., 63 F.Supp. 513 (S.D.N.Y.1945), aff’d, 332 U.S. 319 , 67 S.Ct. 1634 , 91 L.Ed. 2077 (1947); see also, United States v. … Defendants cite Parker v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2024
United States v. Chansley, 525 F. Supp. 3d 151, 155 (D.D.C. 2021). … United States v. Farrell, 606 F.2d 1341, 1347 (D.C. Cir. 1979); see also United States v. Brown, 185 F. Supp. 3d 79, 82 (D.D.C. 2016) (“The D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmex Systems, Inc. v. Cardenas
519 F. Supp. 537 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 1981
In Abbott Laboratories v. … See Eastern Canvas Products v. Brown, 580 F.2d 675 (D.C.Cir.1978).
Cited 1 timesPublishedMallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Watson
169 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 1959
In re Edison, 30 App.D.C. 321 ; Weeks v. Warp, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 235 , 221 F.2d 108 . The principal claim involved in this action is Claim 2, which covers the com *852 pound. … The applicant, however, chose instead of amending his claims after thé Examiner rejected the earlier application, to appeal vj;o the Board of Appeals? which affirmed the Examiner’s decision.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Dec 20, 2022
United States v. Moon, 718 F.2d 1210, 1234 (2d Cir. 1983) (citations omitted); see also United States v. … Harris v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedProfessional Air Traffic Controllers Organization v. Bond
477 F. Supp. 62 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 1979
In Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. … In Spokane, Portland and Seattle v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEast Bay Municipal Utility District v. United States Department of Commerce
948 F. Supp. 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 4, 1996
In 1942, local draft boards began granting occupational deferments for essential workers. … V.
Cited 4 timesPublished587 F. Supp. 1029 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 17, 1984
Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 744 (D.C.Cir.1979). Moving to the second and third factors, the court finds that plaintiffs were not motivated by commercial gain in their FOIA action, which cuts in their favor. … See Baldrige v. Shapiro, 455 U.S. 345 , 360 n. 14, 102 S.Ct. 1103 , 1112 n. 14, 71 L.Ed.2d 199 (1982); NLRB v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedRodriguez v. United States Department of Treasury
131 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 1990
See Selzer v. Board of Educ., 113 F.R.D. 165, 167 (S.D.N.Y.1986) (citing General Tel. Co. of Southwest v. Falcon, 457 U.S. 147 , 157 n. 13, 102 S.Ct. 2364 , 2370 n. 13, 72 L.Ed.2d 740 (1982)). *8 2. … Daubert v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedWaterview Management Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
257 F. Supp. 2d 31 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2003
After the remand of this case from the Court of Appeals, see Waterview Management Co. v. … This provision has been interpreted by the Sixth Circuit, in RTC v. Cheshire Mgmt.
Cited 2 timesPublished241 F. Supp. 910 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 1965
Claims 10 and 21, considered illustrative by the Board of Appeals, read as follows: 10. … Abbot et al. v. Coe, 71 U.S.App.D.C. 195 , 109 F.2d 449 (1939).
Cited 0 timesPublished683 F. Supp. 2d 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 2, 2010
Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). A complaint must present “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face” and “above the speculative level.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. … Torrence v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedHoldzclaw Ex Rel. A.H. v. District of Columbia
524 F. Supp. 2d 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 5, 2007
Board of Educ. Of Hendrick Hudson Central School Dist. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 206 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982). … Paolella v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Oct 21, 2025
It appears from the complaint that Smith’s name nonetheless appeared on the ballot after a vote by the board of elections. … Beckford v. Esper, No. 18-cv-940, 2018 WL 4778930, at *1 (D.D.C. Oct. 3, 2018) (quoting Pendleton v. Mukasey, 552 F. Supp. 2d 14, 17 (D.D.C. 2008)).
Cited 0 timesPublished113 F. Supp. 324 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 1953
the Act provides: “The period of military service shall not be included in computing any period now or hereafter to be limited by any law, regulation, or order for the bringing of any action or proceeding in any court, board … Maier v. Independent Taxi Owner’s Ass’n, 68 U.S.App.D.C. 307, 96 F.2d 579, 582 .
Cited 11 timesPublished96 B.R. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 1989
See, e.g., Key v. … See Brock v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedYoung v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2022
(“the Board”). 1 Plain- tiffs, who have significant industry experience, sought membership on both the Committee and the Board but ultimately were not selected when the new members were announced in June 2021. … Young had served on the Board but not the Committee; Dr. Cox had served on both the Committee and the Board. Id.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jul 23, 2020
See Hyatt v. Iancu, No. 18-2390, et al. (Fed. Cir. argued Feb. 6, 2020). 3 At the time, the Board was known as the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. See Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L. … Hosps., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished598 F. Supp. 126 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 1984
See, e.g., Tinch v. Walters, 573 F.Supp. 346, 348 (E.D.Tenn.1983); Simpson v. Reynolds Metals Co., 629 F.2d 1226, 1228 , 1231 n. 8 (7th Cir.1980); Davis v. Bucher, 451 F.Supp. 791, 796 (E.D.Pa.1978). … See Doe v.
Cited 38 timesPublished344 F. Supp. 974 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 1972
See Allen v. State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 , 89 S.Ct. 817 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 (1969); Phillips v. United States, 312 U.S. 246 , 61 S.Ct. 480 , 85 L.Ed. 800 (1941). … Cole v. Richardson, 405 U.S. at 678 , 92 S.Ct. at 1334 . See also Biklen v. Board of Education, 406 U.S. 951 , 92 S.Ct. 2060 , 32 L.Ed.2d 340 (1972).
Cited 21 timesPublished
Ask Donna