Case law

Cameron v. Riggs Nat. Bank

53 F. Supp. 56 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1943

of Columbia, as local creditors in substantially, if not all, other jurisdictions in the United States, are to be given an opportunity to assert their claims against local assets of a decedent domiciled elsewhere seems clearly … If the right to sue is qualified by a provision that gives to an interested party the right to require a bond for the protection of local creditors, it is difficult to see how there can be a right to demand such payment,

Northwest Immigrant Rights Project v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 8, 2020

“No more is required to establish standing under Havens.” Id. … for a fee waiver will find a way to pay for the uniquely attractive benefits accorded to qualified immigrants.

Hill v. United States Department of the Interior

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 19, 2023

Rather, it was the June 22, 2016, publication of the Statement of Findings itself that was the final agency action.”); id. at 18 (“[T]he final agency action for the purposes of judicial review is clearly the Publication … itself must be specifically established as based in treaty, statute or agency regulation.”).

Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Shalala

963 F. Supp. 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 1997

by the CDRH and the other three as drugs subject to the more rigorous regimen established by the CDER. … But where Congress has not clearly required exhaustion, sound judicial discretion governs.” McCarthy v. Madigan, 503 U.S. 140, 144 , 112 S.Ct. 1081, 1086 , 117 L.Ed.2d 291 (1992) (citations omitted).

Ventura v. Bebo Foods, Inc.

738 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 3, 2010

Ailes, 428 A.2d 816, 821 (D.C.1981) (finding that when a plaintiff has established a right to accrued paid leave and has further established the amount of leave accrued, the burden shifts to the defendant to prove “an agreement … The evidence in the record clearly establishes that Ventura was employed by defendants in December 2007.

Grant v. Astrue

857 F. Supp. 2d 146 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 30, 2012

Statutory and Regulatory Framework In order to qualify for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, a claimant must establish that he or she is “disabled.” 42 U.S.C. § 423. … The ALJ observed that Grant’s “overall demeanor” and ability to “answer questions quite clearly” were “not suggestive of a person experiencing disabling limitations.” A.R. at 30.

Bluewater Network v. Salazar

721 F. Supp. 2d 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2010

Additionally, it discussed a greater number of impact topics in the EA, used more recent studies, see, e.g., GUIS-00308, and a more clearly articulated methodology to analyze impacts and impairments, see infra at III.B.3. … According to NPS, a "key concept [in both policies] is the purpose for which a park was established.” GUIS-00305. 26 .

Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Ass'n of the United States & Canada v. Jordan Interiors, Inc.

826 F. Supp. 2d 241 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2011

the agreement, whichever is later, or (3) such agreement requires the employer to notify such labor organization of opportunities for employment with such employer, or gives such labor organization an opportunity to refer qualified … As explained above, the LAUSD Agreement clearly provides that a contractor shall become bound by the Agreement with the issuance of a letter of assent.

Banks v. Office of Senate Sergeant-At-Arms

222 F.R.D. 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 3, 2004

Judge Kennedy, however, did not rule on defendant’s motion for an extension of the previously established deadlines for the completion of discovery and the filing of motions for summary judgment. … Clearly, these are two distinct demands because knowing that an event occurred is entirely different from learning about the documents that evidence it occurred.

Wisdom v. United States Trustee Program

232 F. Supp. 3d 97 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 2017

“must constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6); see also Am. … The second prong of the Exemption 6 analysis, as a result, is clearly satisfied with regard to these names.

Northwest Immigrant Rights Project v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 8, 2020

“No more is required to establish standing under Havens.” Id. … for a fee waiver will find a way to pay for the uniquely attractive benefits accorded to qualified immigrants.

Klotzbach-Piper v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 12, 2022

Cir. 2008) (“[T]o establish constructive discharge, the plaintiff must make a further showing: She must show that the abusive working environment became so intolerable that her resignation qualified as a fitting response … In Lim. at 5, and therefore qualify as original, see Fed R.

Ali v. Southeast Neighborhood House

519 F. Supp. 489 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 17, 1981

When plaintiff’s counsel attempted to cross-examine Lockridge about the statement, the Court was required to sustain defendant’s technical objection because the question was clearly beyond scope of the direct examination, … the Quran, and sought to determine the dilemmas and disputes then present in plaintiff’s Department on their factual bases, concluding, wholly apart from any perception of the plaintiff’s values, that Ali was simply not qualified

Harris v. Koenig

722 F. Supp. 2d 44 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 2010

Andersen, who presided over the Illinois Litigation, denied the motion after finding that the earlier part of the class period in this Court’s lawsuit “clearly fall[s] outside of the scope of the settlement language of the … As such, they fail to qualify as acts of concealment under § 413.

United States v. Zaitar

858 F. Supp. 2d 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 7, 2012

However, it was clearly intended from the beginning, and so understood by Mr. Zaitar, that the two cases would be joined for trial. … Dota, 33 F.3d 1179, 1183 (9th Cir. 1994) (noting that the “established rule” is “that the speedy trial clock begins to tick on the date the last codefendant appears”).

Reed v. Department of the Navy

910 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2012

Thus, Carter’s disclosures were clearly derived from “records” within the meaning of the Privacy Act. 4. … If plaintiff cannot establish that disclosure was improper, he cannot, as a matter of law, succeed under the Privacy Act.

In Re: Fannie mae/freddie Mac Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement Class Action Litigations

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 7, 2021

the named representative must not have antagonistic or conflicting interests with the unnamed members of the class, and (2) the representative must appear able to vigorously prosecute the interests of the class through qualified … The requirement is "intended to protect absent plaintiffs by enabling notice and to protect defendants 'by enabling a final judgment that clearly identifies who is bound by it."' Id.

Spirit of the Sage Council v. Norton

294 F. Supp. 2d 67 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 11, 2003

Glickman, and causation is therefore established. *83 Defendants contend that plaintiffs have failed to establish redressability because invalidation of the Rule would not result in revocation of the permits alleged to be … Clearly, the balance of harms weighs in favor of a finding that the issues presented are ripe for judicial review. D.

Air Transport Ass'n of America v. Federal Energy Office

382 F. Supp. 437 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 1974

For this reason the Committee has qualified the direction to the President . . . that the regulation be so constructed as to accomplish the enumerated objectives ‘to the maximum extent practicable.’ … S. 168 , 90 S.Ct. 314 , 24 L.Ed.2d 345 *447 (1969), cited by plaintiffs, are clearly distinguishable, as they involved narrowly defined Congressional mandates.

Gration v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2023

Plaintiffs seek in personam relief, raising the key question whether defendants are entitled to immunity under the “state sponsor of terrorism” exception set forth in §1605A. 7 “[T]he FSIA establishes a general … rule granting foreign sovereigns immunity from the jurisdiction of United States courts,” Mohammadi v.