Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.74s
Judicial Watch Inc v. U.S. Department of Commerce
District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 7, 2010
Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedColorado Springs Production Credit Ass'n v. Farm Credit Administration
695 F. Supp. 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 1988
In Connolly v. … Bob Jones University v. Simon, 416 U.S. 725 , 94 S.Ct. 2038 , 40 L.Ed.2d 496 (1974); Haralson v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 837 F.2d 1123 (D.C.Cir.1988). This claim, therefore, must be dismissed. D.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWashington Star Co. v. International Typographical Union Negotiated Pension Plan
582 F. Supp. 301 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 9, 1983
Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton Railroad Co. (Alton), 295 U.S. 330 , 55 S.Ct. 758 , 79 L.Ed. 1468 (1935) and Allied Structural Steel Co. v. … There are no issues of disputed fact as in Gibson v. Berryhill, 411 U.S. 564 , 93 S.Ct. 1689 , 36 L.Ed.2d 488 (1973) (board of optometrists determined fitness to practice optometry); Ward v.
Cited 5 timesPublished525 F. Supp. 621 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 1981
Browning, 435 F.2d 96 (D.C.Cir.1970), that a district court does have extraterritorial service of process power in subpoena enforcement activities under section 9 of the FTCA. See also, Federal Election Commission v. … Similar arguments were advanced by the respondent in United States v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFisher v. District of Columbia
828 F. Supp. 87 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 2, 1993
See Clevenger v. Oak Ridge School Board, 744 F.2d 514 , 516-17 (6th Cir.1984). … See Parks v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedVan EE v. Environmental Protection Agency
55 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 1999
Co. v. … D.C. at 126 (quoting the balancing test set forth in Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734-35 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968)).
Reversed on other grounds by Van Ee v. Environmental Protection Agency, 202 F.3d 296 (2000)Cited 9 timesPublishedCotton v. District of Columbia
541 F. Supp. 2d 195 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2008
Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . 2.
Cited 35 timesPublishedWindstead v. District of Columbia
596 F. Supp. 2d 50 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 2009
of Education v. … See Chiplin [Enterprises, Inc. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedKanam v. Office of the Secretary
District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2020
The Sixth Circuit’s opinion in Dubuc v. Michigan Board of Law Examiners, 342 F.3d 610 (6th Cir. 2003) explains why. … Mich. 1998) (finding that the Michigan State Board of Law Examiners is a judicial agency of the state entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity).
Cited 0 timesPublishedInterstate Commerce Commission v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.
189 F. Supp. 875 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1960
Justice Douglas in the Hecht Co. v. Bowles, 321 U.S. 321 , at page 329, 64 S.Ct. 587 , at page 592, 88 L.Ed. 754 . That case is similar to the case at bar, both on the facts and on the law. … Accordingly, the Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals for this Circuit [Brown v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBell v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
67 F. Supp. 3d 320 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 2014
See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … See Rosenboro v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedFirst American Corp. v. Al-Nahyan
948 F. Supp. 1107 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 26, 1996
Altman (“Altman”), President and a Director of First American from 1981-1991, member of the Board of Directors of FAB and a Managing Director of CCAI and CCAH. … Id. at 993; see Dooley v. United Tech. Corp., 786 F.Supp. 65, 71 (D.D.C.1992); Brown v. Artery Org., Inc., 654 F.Supp. 1106, 1110 (D.D.C.1987). This standard is met here with respect to the Dubai Defendants.
Cited 45 timesPublished768 F. Supp. 2d 121 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2011
Brown v. Carlson, 2009 WL 2914191 , at *4-5 (Mass.Super.Ct. Sept. 1, 2009). For example, the D.C. Circuit in Holmes v. … Brown, 2009 WL 2914191 , at *6.
Cited 24 timesPublishedCommitte v. Georgetown University
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 3, 2018
Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citation omitted). … Lawson v. Sessions, 271 F. Supp. 3d 119, 134 (D.D.C. 2017) (quoting Townsend v. United States, 236 F. Supp. 3d 280, 298 (D.D.C. 2017)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCulbreth v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2009
See Souders v. WMATA, 48 F.3d 546 (D.C. Cir. 1995); Morris v. WMATA, 781 F.2d 218 (D.C. Cir. 1986). … See Board of Trustees v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356 (2001). It follows that WMATA is also immune from liability under Title I of the ADA. See Hopps v. WMATA, 480 F. Supp. 2d 243 (D.D.C. 2007).
Cited 0 timesPublished696 F. Supp. 2d 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 2010
Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . “Threadbare *29 recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”
Cited 55 timesPublishedMorello v. District of Columbia
73 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 7, 2014
Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … .”); Oklahoma City v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedProject for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability, Inc. v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 6, 2024
Mayer Brown LLP v. Internal Revenue Serv., 562 F.3d 1190, 1194 (D.C. Cir. 2009). … Mayer Brown, 562 F.3d at 1193.
Cited 0 timesPublished195 F. Supp. 588 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 1961
On June 27 the Port Authority Board of Commissioners, at a specially-called meeting, “directed” Mr. … United States v.
Reversed on other grounds by Austin J. Tobin v. United States, 306 F.2d 270 (1962)Cited 8 timesPublishedInternational Painters & Allied Trades Union & Industry Pension Fund v. H.W. Ellis Painting Co.
288 F. Supp. 2d 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 2003
v. … See Brown v.
Cited 50 timesPublished
Ask Donna