Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.44s
District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 2020
Lane-Rauth v. Barnhart, 437 F. Supp. 2d 63, 65 (D.D.C. 2006) (quoting Butler, 353 F.3d at 999). While the ALJ is “entitled to weigh conflicting opinions and to make his own assessment of their credibility,” Brown v. … (quoting Brown, 794 F.2d at 708 (remanding decision to deny SSI where ALJ failed to adequately explain its analysis)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPerpetual Building Ltd. Partnership v. District of Columbia
618 F. Supp. 603 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 1985
Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence § 805, at 191-92 (5th ed. 1941); accord, International Organization of Masters v. Brown, 698 F.2d 536, 551 (D.C.Cir.1983) (quoting Hoeber v. … International Organization of Masters v. Brown, supra, 698 F.2d at 551-52 ; L'Enfant Plaza Properties, Inc. v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency, 564 F.2d 515, at 524 (D.C.Cir.1977); Hoeber v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedAvila v. U.S. Department of State
District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 2022
In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754, 760 (D.C. Cir. 2014). … Likewise, Document 70 is an email from a State Department official to a State Department lawyer asking for legal advice regarding the Accountability Review Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Sep 14, 2026
The Merit Systems Protection Board sustained the indefinite suspension in March 2020. Def.’s Ex. R at 2, ECF No. 63-18. … Mary’s Honor Ctr. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished775 F. Supp. 2d 140 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 7, 2011
See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C.1977). Here, it appears that plain *143 tiff seeks to re-litigate claims that have already been decided by courts in this Circuit. Compare Hamrick, Civ. A. … See Smalls v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBlackwell Construction Co. v. Garrell
352 F. Supp. 192 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1972
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Brown, 47 F.2d 265, 266 (N.D.Ill.1930); Travelers Insurance Company v. Belair, 290 F.Supp. 221, 223 (D.Mass.1968). 6. … Voris v. Eikel, 346 U.S. 328, 333 , 74 S.Ct. 88 , 98 L.Ed. 5 (1953).
Cited 11 timesPublishedAUTUMN JOURNEY HOSPICE, INC. v. Sebelius
753 F. Supp. 2d 135 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 3, 2010
Tripp v. Exec. Off. of the Pres., 194 F.R.D. 340, 342 (D.D.C.2000). … (Dec. 22, 2009); Compl., Hospice Advantage, Inc. v. Sebelius, No. 10-845 (D.D.C. May 21, 2010); Compl., Affinity Healthcare Servs., Inc. v. Sebelius, No. 10-946 (D.D.C.
Cited 9 timesPublished3 F. Supp. 2d 1464 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 1998
See Dendy v. Washington Hosp. Center, 581 F.2d 990, 992 (D.C.Cir.1978) (footnote omitted); Washington Metro., Area Transit Comm’n v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841, 843 (D.C.Cir.1977). … See Jersey Shore Broadcasting Corp. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSamaritan Health Center v. Heckler
636 F. Supp. 503 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 29, 1985
If a provider wishes to challenge the adequacy of a notice of proposed reimbursement or a prepayment determination, it may appeal to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB or Board). 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo; see Tucson … “Consideration by the Provider Reimbursement Review Board [is confined] to disputes over the amount properly reimbursable.” Humana of South Carolina, Inc. v. Califano, 590 F.2d 1070, 1081 (D.C.Cir.1978).
Cited 12 timesPublishedJudicial Watch Inc v. U.S. Department of Commerce
District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 7, 2010
Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedColorado Springs Production Credit Ass'n v. Farm Credit Administration
695 F. Supp. 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 1988
In Connolly v. … Bob Jones University v. Simon, 416 U.S. 725 , 94 S.Ct. 2038 , 40 L.Ed.2d 496 (1974); Haralson v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 837 F.2d 1123 (D.C.Cir.1988). This claim, therefore, must be dismissed. D.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNational Ass'n for Advancement of Colored People v. Bell
76 F.R.D. 134 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 16, 1977
Exhibit A MEMORANDUM TO ALL UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS AND ALL HEADS OF OFFICES, DIVISIONS, BUREAUS AND BOARDS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SUBJECT: Dual Prosecution Policy in Cases Involving Violations of Civil Rights_ By memorandum … See e. g., Boxley v. Rodgers, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 408 , 395 F.2d 631 (1968); Beringhelle v. Richardson, 457 F.2d 345, 346 (9th Cir. 1972). See also Nader v. Volpe, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 332, 333-34 , 475 F.2d 916, 917-18 (1973).
Cited 2 timesPublished86 F.2d 217 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 1936
. ****** “V. … Dear v. Guy, 64 App.D.C. 314 , 78 F.(2d) 198 ; Pollock v. Jameson, 63 App.D.C. 152 , 70 F.(2d) 756 ; Rhoderick v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedWindstead v. District of Columbia
596 F. Supp. 2d 50 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 2009
of Education v. … See Chiplin [Enterprises, Inc. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedKanam v. Office of the Secretary
District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2020
The Sixth Circuit’s opinion in Dubuc v. Michigan Board of Law Examiners, 342 F.3d 610 (6th Cir. 2003) explains why. … Mich. 1998) (finding that the Michigan State Board of Law Examiners is a judicial agency of the state entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity).
Cited 0 timesPublished768 F. Supp. 2d 121 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2011
Brown v. Carlson, 2009 WL 2914191 , at *4-5 (Mass.Super.Ct. Sept. 1, 2009). For example, the D.C. Circuit in Holmes v. … Brown, 2009 WL 2914191 , at *6.
Cited 24 timesPublishedMorello v. District of Columbia
73 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 7, 2014
Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … .”); Oklahoma City v.
Cited 4 timesPublished195 F. Supp. 588 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 1961
On June 27 the Port Authority Board of Commissioners, at a specially-called meeting, “directed” Mr. … United States v.
Reversed on other grounds by Austin J. Tobin v. United States, 306 F.2d 270 (1962)Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 2009
Pugliese v. Nelson, 617 F.2d 916,923 (2d Cir.1980) (summarizing the Supreme Court's holding in Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal and Corr. Complex, 442 U.S. 1 (1979». … Ellis v. District of Columbia, 84 F.3d 1413, 1415-20 (D.C.Cir.l996); accord Blair-Bey v. Quick, 151 F.3d 1036, 1047 (D.C. Cir. 1998); Brandon v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, 823 F.2d 644,648 (D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jan 3, 2017
Reid v. District of Columbia, 401 F.3d 516, 524 (D.C. Cir. 2005). … (quoting Brown v. District of Columbia, 568 F. Supp. 2d 44, 54 (D.D.C. 2008)).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna