Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

3.44s

  • Childs v. Berryhill

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 2020

    Lane-Rauth v. Barnhart, 437 F. Supp. 2d 63, 65 (D.D.C. 2006) (quoting Butler, 353 F.3d at 999). While the ALJ is “entitled to weigh conflicting opinions and to make his own assessment of their credibility,” Brown v. … (quoting Brown, 794 F.2d at 708 (remanding decision to deny SSI where ALJ failed to adequately explain its analysis)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Perpetual Building Ltd. Partnership v. District of Columbia

    618 F. Supp. 603 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 1985

    Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence § 805, at 191-92 (5th ed. 1941); accord, International Organization of Masters v. Brown, 698 F.2d 536, 551 (D.C.Cir.1983) (quoting Hoeber v. … International Organization of Masters v. Brown, supra, 698 F.2d at 551-52 ; L'Enfant Plaza Properties, Inc. v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency, 564 F.2d 515, at 524 (D.C.Cir.1977); Hoeber v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Avila v. U.S. Department of State

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 2022

    In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754, 760 (D.C. Cir. 2014). … Likewise, Document 70 is an email from a State Department official to a State Department lawyer asking for legal advice regarding the Accountability Review Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cobb v. Harker

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 14, 2026

    The Merit Systems Protection Board sustained the indefinite suspension in March 2020. Def.’s Ex. R at 2, ECF No. 63-18. … Mary’s Honor Ctr. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hamrick v. United States

    775 F. Supp. 2d 140 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 7, 2011

    See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C.1977). Here, it appears that plain *143 tiff seeks to re-litigate claims that have already been decided by courts in this Circuit. Compare Hamrick, Civ. A. … See Smalls v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Blackwell Construction Co. v. Garrell

    352 F. Supp. 192 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1972

    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Brown, 47 F.2d 265, 266 (N.D.Ill.1930); Travelers Insurance Company v. Belair, 290 F.Supp. 221, 223 (D.Mass.1968). 6. … Voris v. Eikel, 346 U.S. 328, 333 , 74 S.Ct. 88 , 98 L.Ed. 5 (1953).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • AUTUMN JOURNEY HOSPICE, INC. v. Sebelius

    753 F. Supp. 2d 135 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 3, 2010

    Tripp v. Exec. Off. of the Pres., 194 F.R.D. 340, 342 (D.D.C.2000). … (Dec. 22, 2009); Compl., Hospice Advantage, Inc. v. Sebelius, No. 10-845 (D.D.C. May 21, 2010); Compl., Affinity Healthcare Servs., Inc. v. Sebelius, No. 10-946 (D.D.C.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • DSE, Inc. v. United States

    3 F. Supp. 2d 1464 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 1998

    See Dendy v. Washington Hosp. Center, 581 F.2d 990, 992 (D.C.Cir.1978) (footnote omitted); Washington Metro., Area Transit Comm’n v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841, 843 (D.C.Cir.1977). … See Jersey Shore Broadcasting Corp. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Samaritan Health Center v. Heckler

    636 F. Supp. 503 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 29, 1985

    If a provider wishes to challenge the adequacy of a notice of proposed reimbursement or a prepayment determination, it may appeal to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB or Board). 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo; see Tucson … “Consideration by the Provider Reimbursement Review Board [is confined] to disputes over the amount properly reimbursable.” Humana of South Carolina, Inc. v. Califano, 590 F.2d 1070, 1081 (D.C.Cir.1978).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Judicial Watch Inc v. U.S. Department of Commerce

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 7, 2010

    Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Colorado Springs Production Credit Ass'n v. Farm Credit Administration

    695 F. Supp. 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 1988

    In Connolly v. … Bob Jones University v. Simon, 416 U.S. 725 , 94 S.Ct. 2038 , 40 L.Ed.2d 496 (1974); Haralson v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 837 F.2d 1123 (D.C.Cir.1988). This claim, therefore, must be dismissed. D.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Ass'n for Advancement of Colored People v. Bell

    76 F.R.D. 134 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 16, 1977

    Exhibit A MEMORANDUM TO ALL UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS AND ALL HEADS OF OFFICES, DIVISIONS, BUREAUS AND BOARDS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SUBJECT: Dual Prosecution Policy in Cases Involving Violations of Civil Rights_ By memorandum … See e. g., Boxley v. Rodgers, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 408 , 395 F.2d 631 (1968); Beringhelle v. Richardson, 457 F.2d 345, 346 (9th Cir. 1972). See also Nader v. Volpe, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 332, 333-34 , 475 F.2d 916, 917-18 (1973).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hazen v. Hawley

    86 F.2d 217 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 1936

    . ****** “V. … Dear v. Guy, 64 App.D.C. 314 , 78 F.(2d) 198 ; Pollock v. Jameson, 63 App.D.C. 152 , 70 F.(2d) 756 ; Rhoderick v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Windstead v. District of Columbia

    596 F. Supp. 2d 50 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 2009

    of Education v. … See Chiplin [Enterprises, Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kanam v. Office of the Secretary

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2020

    The Sixth Circuit’s opinion in Dubuc v. Michigan Board of Law Examiners, 342 F.3d 610 (6th Cir. 2003) explains why. … Mich. 1998) (finding that the Michigan State Board of Law Examiners is a judicial agency of the state entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chen v. Bell-Smith

    768 F. Supp. 2d 121 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2011

    Brown v. Carlson, 2009 WL 2914191 , at *4-5 (Mass.Super.Ct. Sept. 1, 2009). For example, the D.C. Circuit in Holmes v. … Brown, 2009 WL 2914191 , at *6.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Morello v. District of Columbia

    73 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 7, 2014

    Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … .”); Oklahoma City v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Tobin

    195 F. Supp. 588 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 1961

    On June 27 the Port Authority Board of Commissioners, at a specially-called meeting, “directed” Mr. … United States v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Austin J. Tobin v. United States, 306 F.2d 270 (1962)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Crosby v. Zoley

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 2009

    Pugliese v. Nelson, 617 F.2d 916,923 (2d Cir.1980) (summarizing the Supreme Court's holding in Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal and Corr. Complex, 442 U.S. 1 (1979». … Ellis v. District of Columbia, 84 F.3d 1413, 1415-20 (D.C.Cir.l996); accord Blair-Bey v. Quick, 151 F.3d 1036, 1047 (D.C. Cir. 1998); Brandon v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, 823 F.2d 644,648 (D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lee v. District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 3, 2017

    Reid v. District of Columbia, 401 F.3d 516, 524 (D.C. Cir. 2005). … (quoting Brown v. District of Columbia, 568 F. Supp. 2d 44, 54 (D.D.C. 2008)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.