Case law

Flynn v. R.D. Masonry, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 7, 2010

Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Randolph Civic Ass'n v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

469 F. Supp. 968 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 25, 1979

On December 19, 1974, the WMATA Board of Directors adopted the recommendation of a commissioned study by the Architectural Planning Research Associates that three of the five sites be studied further. … The WMATA Board approved this location on July 29, 1976. Pursuant to its grant application to UMTA in June 1977, WMATA circulated a draft EIS to appropriate agencies, which had 75 days to file comments.

Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Internal Revenue Service

261 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 18, 2017

Brown v. FBI, 675 F. … FOIA’s prerequisites generally carry an “across-the-board” application, regardless of whether individuals invoke § 6103(k)(3) (or any other section) in their request. Maxwell v. Snow, 409 F.3d 354, 357 (D.C.

Pearsall v. Gonzalez

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 2009

Scolaro v. D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics, 104 F. Supp. 2d 18, 22 (D.D.C. 2000). B. … See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). C.

Segar v. Ashcroft

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 25, 2019

Segar v. Smith, Civ. Action No. 77- civ-81, 1982 WL 214 at *1 (D.D.C. Feb. 17, 1982). … Connecticut v. Teal is the seminal case on this issue. Id.

Bi Solutions, LLC v. Campbell

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 7, 2009

v. Philip Morris, Inc., 287 F.3d 192, 196 (D.C. Cir. 2002); see 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). … See id. § 1332(a)(1); Prakash v. Am. Univ., 727 F.2d 1174, 1178 n.25 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Lend Lease (Us) Construction, Inc.

170 F. Supp. 3d 190 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2016

Rollins v. Wackenhut Servs., Inc., 703 F.3d 122, 130 (D.C. Cir. 2012). A motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) “tests the legal sufficiency of a complaint.” Browning v. … Ashcroft v.

Stoddard v. Wynn

68 F. Supp. 3d 104 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 2014

Board of Parole used to manage D.C. parolees, but in 1997 Congress transferred the D.C. Board of Parole’s authority to the U.S. Parole 6 Commission. … Parole Commission to “assume the jurisdiction and authority of the Board of Parole of the District of Columbia to grant and deny parole, and to impose conditions upon an order of parole, in the case of any imprisoned felon

United States v. Gaffney

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 7, 2025

See United States v. Brown, 520 F.2d 1106, 1110 (D.C. Cir. 1975) (Rule 48(b) and the Sixth Amendment); Nickens, 323 F.2d at 814 (Wright, J., concurring). … Brown, 520 F.2d at 1113. After it charged Mr.

Hobbs v. Lewis

159 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 24, 1958

Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir., 1948, 170 F.2d 247 , 12 A. L.R.2d 240, certiorari denied 336 U.S. 960 , 69 S.Ct. 887 , 93 L.Ed. 1112 ; Hooker v. … Hurd v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co., supra, 136 F.Supp. at page 154 ; Menke v. Thompson, 140 F.2d 786, 791 . In reaching this conclusion, I have not overlooked Van Horn v.

Moreland v. 1010 v. LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 20, 2025

They brought this action against defendant 1010 V LLC (“defendant” or “1010 V”), claiming that defendant misappropriated their images to promote its nightclub. Compl. [Dkt. #1]. … See Scott v. District of Columbia, 598 F.

United States v. Ausby

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 11, 2019

Wilson, 420 U.S. 332, 343 (1975) (quoting North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 717 (1969), as well as “successive prosecution and cumulative punishment for a greater and lesser included offense,” Brown v. … Brown, 432 U.S. at 166.

Lindsey v. District of Columbia Government

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 23, 2010

Lindsey sought a hearing before an MPD Adverse Action Trial Board. Id. ¶ 8. … Abhe & Svoboda, Inc. v. Chao, 508 F.3d 1052, 1059 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

Price v. Automotive Finance Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 2026

Supp. 2d 33, 36 (D.D.C. 2005) (quoting Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M St. LLC, 257 F. Supp. 2d 175, 177 (D.D.C. 2003)). B. … Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151-52 (D.C. Cir. 2015). III. DISCUSSION The court will deny Ms.

Alter v. Federal Communications Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 2025

See FCC v. … ECF No. 20 at 1–2; ECF No. 32 at 2; see Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C.

Bailey v. District of Columbia

839 F. Supp. 888 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 1993

See, e.g., Northcross v. Board of Ed. of Memphis City, 611 F.2d 624, 639 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 2999 , 3000, 64 L.Ed.2d 862 (1980). … Webb v. Board of Education, 471 U.S. 234, 244 , 105 S.Ct. 1923, 1929 , 85 L.Ed.2d 233 (1985). 5 . Reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred litigating a fee petition are compensable. See, e.g., Sierra Club v.

Rosemond v. Washington

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 2025

See Watson v. D.C. Water & Sewer Auth., 249 F. Supp. 3d 462, 464 (D.D.C. 2017); Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). … See Bolling v.

United States v. O'Keefe

537 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2008

Co. v. … Taube Corp. v.

Cobb v. Harker

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 14, 2026

The Merit Systems Protection Board sustained the indefinite suspension in March 2020. Def.’s Ex. R at 2, ECF No. 63-18. … Mary’s Honor Ctr. v.

Livnat v. Palestinian Authority

82 F. Supp. 3d 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 11, 2015

Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S. Ct. 746, 751 (2014) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tire Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 131 S. Ct. 2846, 2851 (2011)); see also Goodyear, 131 S. Ct. at 2853 (quoting International Shoe v. … No General Jurisdiction over the Palestinian Authority 11 In two recent cases, Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S. Ct. 746 (2014), and Goodyear Dunlop Tire Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 131 S.