Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.81s
Alton & Southern Railway Company v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes division/ibt
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2022
BNSF Railway v. … See ARASA v. Soo Line R.R., 891 F.2d 675 (8th Cir. 1989); UTU v. Grand Trunk Western R.R., 901 F.2d 489 (6th Cir. 1990).
Cited 0 timesPublishedGraybeal v. American Savings & Loan Ass'n
59 F.R.D. 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 24, 1973
In Shields v. … The Report and Recommendations werd approved by the Board of Regents on March 15, 1972. . 15 U.S.C. § 1640 (e). . Ratner v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co., 54 F.R.D. 412 (S.D.N.Y. 1972); see also Shields v.
Cited 54 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Aug 12, 2020
Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … (citing 5 U.S.C. § 552a(j) (authorizing agencies to make exemptions) and 28 C.F.R. § 16.97 (listing BOP exemptions)); Brown v. BOP, 602 F.
Cited 0 timesPublished153 F. Supp. 701 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 12, 1957
Goldsmith v. U. S. Board of Tax Appeals, 1926, 270 U.S. 117 , 46 S.Ct. 215 , 70 L.Ed. 494 ; Herman v. Dulles, supra. 16 . See notes 8 and 9, supra. 17 . Camp v. Herzog, supra. 18 . … Civil Aeronautics Board, 1953, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 147 , 153, 199 F.2d 181, 186 , certiorari denied 344 U.S. 922 , 73 S.Ct. 386 , 97 L.Ed. 710 . 22 . United States v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedDistrict of Columbia v. Department of Labor
34 F. Supp. 3d 172 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2014
Sherwood v. Washington Post, 871 F.2d 1144, 1148 n.4 (D.C. Cir. 1989), quoting McKenzie v. Sawyer, 684 F.2d 62, 68 n.3 (D.C. Cir. 1982), abrogated on other grounds by Berger v. … v. FCC, 131 F.3d 1044, 1047 (D.C. Cir. 1997).
Cited 2 timesPublished520 F. Supp. 2d 101 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 10, 2007
See, e.g., Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999). … See, e.g., Chung v. Washington Metro. Area Trans. Auth., 2007 WL 1154084 at *3 (D.D.C. Apr. 18, 2007); Al-Mahdi v. D.C. Pub. Schs., 2005 WL 3272075 at *5 (D.D.C. Dec.2, 2005).
Cited 44 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · May 2, 2023
Caron v. … Pierre v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCohen v. Islamic Republic of Iran
238 F. Supp. 3d 71 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 2017
That evening, the Cohen family boarded the Number 2 Egged Bus to return home. Id. … V.
Cited 54 timesPublishedMorley v. United States Central Intelligence Agency
245 F. Supp. 3d 74 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2017
Fensz‘er v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 744 (D.C. Cir. 1979). … See Maya’ak v. U.S. Dep't of Justz`ce, 579 F.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBlair v. Norwegian Caribbean Lines, A/S
622 F. Supp. 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 20, 1985
They therefore chose not to board the ship and instead stayed overnight to seek a refund from A AAABCO. Neither NCL nor A AAABCO has given plaintiffs any refund to date. Complaint 1140. … See, e.g., Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman, 369 U.S. 463, 466 , 82 S.Ct. 913, 915 , 8 L.Ed.2d 39 (1962); Taylor v.
Cited 5 timesPublished256 F. Supp. 3d 36 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 23, 2017
Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152 (1984). In this case, the plaintiff received notice of the DOJ’s final agency decision on March 16, 2016. See Compl. ¶ 8. … See Horsey v. Harris, 953 F. Supp. 2d 203, 211 (D.D.C. 2013) (finding that equitable tolling did not apply because there was no explanation asserted by the pro se plaintiff for her untimely filing); Brown v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedHagmeyer v. United States Department of Treasury
647 F. Supp. 1300 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 1986
Plaintiff appealed the full Board’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. See generally Hagmeyer v. Dept. of Treasury, 757 F.2d 1281 (Fed.Cir.1985). … See Bivens v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedOwens v. U. S. Bureau of Prisons
379 F. Supp. 547 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 12, 1974
Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. Renegotiation Board, 157 U.S.App.D.C. 121 , 482 F.2d 710 (1973). … See Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. Renegotiation Board, supra. Defendants impliedly recognize this fact by virtue of their release of most of Mr. Owens’ records.
Cited 2 timesPublishedGur-Ravantab v. Georgetown University
District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 2024
Lane v. … Bogosian v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Apr 13, 2022
Brown v. Dist. of Colum., 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008). The Perezes proceed without counsel. This triggers special solicitude for them. … Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (cleaned up). More, courts assess a pro se complaint “in light of all filings, including filings responsive to a motion to dismiss.” Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2010
Jordan, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … See Taylor v. United States Board of Parole, 194 F.2d 882, 883 (D.C. Cir. 1952) (an attack on one's conviction and sentence is properly pursued by motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255); Ojo v.
Cited 0 timesPublished228 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 29, 2016
Cir. 1988) (MacKinnon, J., concurring) (citing Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. Cir. 1985)); see also Bowden v. United States, 106 F.3d 433, 437 (D.C. … In Hairston v.
Cited 82 timesPublished958 F. Supp. 2d 275 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2013
Richardson v. United States, 193 F.3d 545, 548-49 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (citing Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)); Smith, 598 F. Supp. 2d at 47 (citing Atchinson v. District of Columbia, 73 F.3d 418, 425 (D.C. … Henok v. Chase Home Fin., LLC, 915 F. Supp. 2d 109, 114 (D.D.C. 2013) (quoting Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002)); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009).
Cited 10 timesPublishedHamilton Securities Group Inc. v. Department of Housing & Urban Development
106 F. Supp. 2d 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 17, 2000
Corp. v. … The draft audit report is analogous to the Regional Board recommendations protected under the deliberative process privilege in Renegotiation Board v. Grumman Aircraft Eng.
Cited 23 timesPublishedMiango v. Democratic Republic of Congo
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2017
OHJDO FRQFOXVLRQV Browning v. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown 86 XVXDOO\ UHTXLULQJ ³>D@ SDWWHUQ RI VLPLODU FRQVWLWXWLRQDO YLRODWLRQV´ Id.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna