Case law

Oyola v. Midland Funding, LLC

295 F. Supp. 3d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2018

(citing Buckeye Check Cashing v. … IOM Corp. v. Brown Forman Corp. , 627 F.3d 440 , 450 (1st Cir. 2010) (citing Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. , 723 F.2d 155 , 159 (1st Cir. 1983) ).

United States v. Baker Hughes Inc.

731 F. Supp. 3 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 21, 1990

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1523 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … Brown Shoe Co., 370 U.S. at 320-22 , 82 S.Ct. at 1522 ; United States v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co., 378 U.S. 158, 174 , 84 S.Ct. 1710, 1718 , 12 L.Ed.2d 775 (1964).

Guevara v. Spartan Enterprises, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 23, 2020

See, e.g., Lockhart v. … See Spartan Opp. at 7–10; Brown Decl., ¶¶ 6–7, 10, 13, 16–20. Presumably, Bozzuto arrived at this 80/20 split because 36 public-housing units out of 179 total units represents 20.11% of the units in the complex.

Mercadante v. Xe Services, LLC

864 F. Supp. 2d 54 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 2012

See, e.g., Awuah v. Coverall N. Am., Inc., 554 F.3d 7, 11-12 (1st Cir. 2009); Agere Sys., Inc. v. Samsung Elec. Ltd., 560 F.3d 337, 339-40 (5th Cir. 2009); Fallo v. … Furthermore, because “the appropriate standard of review [in this context] is the same standard used in resolving summary judgment motions,” Brown v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, 267 F.

NORTHWEST AUSTIN MUN. UTIL. DIST. ONE v. Mukasey

557 F. Supp. 2d 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 30, 2008

In the first case, Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. … And in Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v.

Keating v. Watson

145 F. Supp. 191 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 1956

inclusive, of his application for patent Serial No. 197,035, and in action 5540-55, a decree authorizing the allowance of claims 1 to 6, inclusive, of his application Serial No. 197,-036, which claims were refused by the Board … The plaintiff’s evidence fails to sustain the burden imposed by Abbott v. Coe, 71 App.D.C. 195 , 109 F.2d 449 .

Davis v. United States Sentencing Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 21, 2011

Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1010 (D.C. Cir. 2009); see Caldwell v. Kagan, 777 F. … Rooney v. Sec'y of Army, 405 F.3d 1029, 1031 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (citing LoBue v. Christopher, 82 F.3d 1081, 1082 (D.C. Cir. 1996»; see Taylor v. United States Board of Parole, 194 F.2d 882, 883 (D.C.

AUTUMN JOURNEY HOSPICE, INC. v. Sebelius

753 F. Supp. 2d 135 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 3, 2010

Tripp v. Exec. Off. of the Pres., 194 F.R.D. 340, 342 (D.D.C.2000). … (Dec. 22, 2009); Compl., Hospice Advantage, Inc. v. Sebelius, No. 10-845 (D.D.C. May 21, 2010); Compl., Affinity Healthcare Servs., Inc. v. Sebelius, No. 10-946 (D.D.C.

Whiteru v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 17, 2018

See, e.g., Smith v. District of Columbia, 430 F.3d 450, 456–57 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (reviewing Smith v. … DATE: December 17, 2018 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District

Freedom Watch, Inc. v. Obama

930 F. Supp. 2d 98 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 15, 2013

Feirson v. District of Columbia, 506 F.3d 1063, 1066 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (quoting Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986)). … Heartwood, Inc. v. U.S. Forest Serv., 431 F. Supp. 2d 28, 34 (D.D.C. 2006) (quoting Pub. Citizen v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 491 U.S. 440, 457-58 (1989)).

Ramos v. Unknown Special Agent

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 10, 2023

Cir. 2010) (courts “may raise the res judicata preclusion defense sua sponte”) (citing Brown v. Dist. of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1285–86 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (other citation omitted)); see also Fenwick v. … Wilson v. Fullwood, 772 F. Supp. 2d 246, 261 (D.D.C. 2011) (collecting cases); see Sunshine Anthracite Coal v.

Entes Industrial Plants Construction and Erection Contracting Co. Inc. v. Kyrgyz Republic

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 22, 2020

Respondents point to the existence of the board in their briefing, but they ignore the important fact, emphasized by Entes, that the leadership of the board are also members of the Government. See Resp’ts’ Supp. … Members of the Government are guaranteed leadership positions on the board. See Frischknecht Decl., Ex.

Patterson v. Johnson

391 F. Supp. 2d 140 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2005

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999). If he succeeds, the burden shifts to defendant to articulate some legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its actions. Id. … Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C.Cir.1985). The deadlines allow an employer to investigate promptly before evidence becomes stale. See Del. State Coll. v.

Harris v. Wilson

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 11, 2017

OHJDOFRQFOXVLRQVBrowning v. … OHJDOFRQFOXVLRQVSee Kowal)GDW see also Browning )GDW  ,Q UXOLQJ XSRQ D PRWLRQ WR GLVPLVV IRU IDLOXUH WR VWDWH D FODLP D FRXUW PD\ RUGLQDULO\ FRQVLGHURQO\³WKH

Autor v. Blank

892 F. Supp. 2d 264 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2012

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citations omitted). I. … See Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568–69 (1968).

McKesson HBOC, Inc. v. Islamic Republic of Iran

226 F.R.D. 56 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 21, 2004

Circuit remanded the case for trial on two issues: (1) the “come to the company” requirement, ie., whether the dairy’s board of directors exercised discretion to require shareholders to physically appear to receive dividends … See United States v. Microsoft, 165 F.3d 952, 959 (D.C.Cir.1999); Tavoulareas v. Piro, 93 F.R.D. 24 , 30 n. 4 (D.D.C.1981).

Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Watt

550 F. Supp. 979 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 1982

Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, 387 U.S. 556, 560 , 87 S.Ct. 1746, 1748-1749 , 18 L.Ed.2d 954 (1967); Olberding v. … Sahara Coal Co., Interior Board of Surface Mining and Reclamation Appeals No. 81-31 (Nov. 30, 1981); Badger Coal Co., Interior Board of Surface Mining and Reclamation Appeals No. 80-16 (July 24, 1980).

Deschamps v. District of Columbia

582 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 23, 2008

Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1964 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007), so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate defense, Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C.1977). … See Maniaci v.

Cole v. United States Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 2010

See McLean v. United States, No. 90-318, 2006 WL 543999, at *l (D.D.C. Mar. 3, 2006) (noting that a court must determine the proper characterization of a filing by the nature of the relief sought) (citing Castro v. … United States Board of Par0le, 194 F.Zd 882, 883 (D.C. Cir. 1952) (attack on the constitutionality of the statute under which defendant was convicted and sentenced is properly pursued by motion under 28 U.S.C. § 225 5).

Coplin v. Pearson

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 22, 2009

See Ojo v. … United States Board of Parole, 194 F.2d 882, 883 (D.C. Cir. 1952).