Case law

Cobb v. Harker

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2025

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). … Bowden, 106 F.3d at 437 (citing Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. Cir. 1985)).

Salesian Society, Province of St. Philip the Apostle, Inc. v. Cissna

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2021

Mot., ECF No. 42-3 at 24 (citing Everson v. Board of Educ. Of Ewing Twp., 330 U.S. 1, 16 (1947)). However, as explained supra, this is not the case. … See Sherbert v.

Center for Law & Education v. United States Department of Education

315 F. Supp. 2d 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2004

In the end, as set forth in the notice, the committee included six representatives of state administrators and state boards of education; four representatives of local administrators and local school boards; three representatives … Co. v.

Portland Hotel Corp. v. Fidelity Storage Corp.

134 F.2d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 1943

Board of Trustees of the National Training School for Boys v. Wilson Co., _ U.S. App.D.C. _, 133 F.2d 399 , decided Janu *58 ary 25, 1943.

Bowe-Connor v. Shinseki

845 F. Supp. 2d 77 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 24, 2012

See Brown v. Marsh, 77 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. Cir. 1985); Rattigan v. Gonzales, 503 F. Supp. 2d 56, 68 (D.D.C. 2007). … Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)).

Dickerson v. O'Malley

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 2025

(quoting Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 708 (D.C. Cir. 1986)). SSA regulations, however, require that the ALJ address the consistency of all medical opinions. 20 C.F.R. § 416.920c(b)(2). … Brown v. Berryhill, No. 18-cv-589, 2019 WL 4538188, at *6 (D.D.C. 2019) (“An ALJ does not have to state on the record every reason justifying a decision.

Floersheim v. Weinburger

346 F. Supp. 950 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 29, 1972

National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); Giant Food Inc. v. … Board of Education for District of Columbia, 247 F.Supp. 21 (D.D.C.1965), cert. denied 386 U.S. 958 , 87 S.Ct. 1026 , 18 L.Ed.2d 106 (1967) ; United States ex rel. Holzendorf v.

Wash. Post Co. v. US DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUM. SERV.

603 F. Supp. 235 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 8, 1985

See Board of Trade of the City of Chicago v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 627 F.2d 392 (D.C.Cir.1980); Brockway v. … Although EPA v.

I-Vi v. Yogi

110 F.R.D. 629 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 18, 1986

United States v. Hubbard, 650 F.2d 293, 316 (D.C.Cir.1980). See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1177-78 (6th Cir.1983). … Brown & Williamson, supra, 710 F.2d at 1179 .

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Orlando

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2026

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). The complaint “must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. … SEC v. DeFrancesco, 699 F.

Marine Transport Lines, Inc. v. United States

173 F. Supp. 326 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 6, 1959

See, e. g., Donnelly Garment Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 8 Cir., 1941, 123 F.2d 215 ; and cases cited therein. … Co. v. United States, supra note 5.

Prudential-Maryland Joint Venture Co. v. Lehman

590 F. Supp. 1390 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 5, 1984

Steinthal & Co. v. Seamans, 455 F.2d 1289, 1301 (D.C.Cir.1971). … Chrysler Corp. v.

Partem v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 29, 2023

Gumpad v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 19 F. … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007).

Horn v. Huddle

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 20, 2009

HORN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Acti0n No. 94-1756 (RCL) FRANKLIN HUDDLE, JR., et al. Defendants. … pleading or other document 'Document [381] and [382], filed on July 16th and l7th, 2009, are still being reviewed, and unclassified versions of these documents are forthcoming. 2 filed by the plaintiff (Horn) or defendants (Brown

Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Customs and Border Protection

248 F. Supp. 3d 12 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2017

Blackwell v. FBI, 646 F.3d 37, 42 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (alteration in original) (quoting Mayer Brown LLP v. Internal Revenue Serv., 562 F.3d 1190, 1193 (D.C. Cir. 2009)). … Mayer Brown, 562 F.3d at 1193.

Searcy v. Vilsack

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 6, 2025

He believed that was incorrect and filed a reprisal complaint with the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). Id. … Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). Complaints filed by pro se litigants are “held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers,” Atherton v. D.C.

Baylor v. Mitchell Rubenstein & Associates, P.C.

55 F. Supp. 3d 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2014

See id.; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Pl.’s Opp. at 19. 4 Plaintiff relies on Brown v.

Brock v. State of Oklahoma

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 4, 2019

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … See Brown v.

Karim-Panahi v. 4000 Massachusetts Apartments

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2018

The latter stemmed from tax liens “fraudulently filed by California Franchise Tax Board,” which, despite Plaintiff’s legal actions, have not been removed. (Id. ¶¶ 65-66). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Sara Lee Corp. v. American Bakers Ass'n Retirement Plan

512 F. Supp. 2d 39 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 11, 2007

Pension Fund v. … See Insurance Corp. of Ireland, Ltd. v.