Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

1.13s

  • Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. National Labor Relations Board

    942 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 4, 2013

    The plaintiff, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in North Carolina, seeks an injunction declaring that the defendant, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”), is without the authority “to require … See Evenflow Transp., Inc. v. NLRB, No. 12-3054 (2d Cir. filed Aug. 1, 2012); NLRB v. New Vista Nursing & Rehab., Nos. 11-3440, 12-1027, and 12-1936 (3d Cir. filed Mar. 29, 2013); NLRB v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United Christian Scientists v. Christian Science Board of Directors

    616 F. Supp. 476 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 1985

    Lemon v. … See, e.g., Everson v. Board of Education, supra, (reimbursement of costs of bus transportation to parents of parochial school students); Board of Education v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Scolaro v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

    946 F. Supp. 80 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 1996

    See also Growe v. … See Watson v. Buck, 313 U.S. 387, 400 , 61 S.Ct. 962, 966 , 85 L.Ed. 1416 (1941); Fenner v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Davis v. District of Columbia Board of Education

    530 F. Supp. 1215 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 21, 1982

    III 1979) and Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia, 348 F.Supp. 866 (D.D.C.1972). … See Patsel v. District of Columbia Board of Education, 530 F.Supp. 660, at 667 (D.D.C.1982) (Memorandum Opinion and Order granting attorney’s fees).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Haden

    872 F. Supp. 1040 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 23, 1994

    ’s Compensation Board. … Jenkins v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 422 So.2d 1109, 1110 (La.1982); cf. Winter v. Brown, 365 A.2d 381, 385 (D.C.1976).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. National Mediation Board

    220 F. Supp. 730 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 19, 1963

    The National Mediation Board intends to proceed immediately with the election. … The proper forum for determination of the issue of carrier interference would appear to be the National Mediation Board. Counsel for defendant asserts that the Board has conducted an “adequate investigation.”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Air Transport Ass'n of America, Inc. v. National Mediation Board

    719 F. Supp. 2d 26 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 28, 2010

    Continental Airlines, Inc. v. National Mediation Board 793 F.Supp. at 334 n. 5. … Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943); *36 Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Becerra

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 6, 2025

    V. … Angarica v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Zukerberg v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics

    999 F. Supp. 2d 79 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2013

    Board of Elections has scheduled the Attorney General election for 2014. … Winter v. NRDC, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 9 (2008).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Eeon, Ronnie, and Sunshine Kahapea v. Federal Reserve Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2023

    Corp. v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977) (citation omitted). Jones’ petition does not meet the Rule 8 pleading standard.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Peele v. Califano

    447 F. Supp. 160 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 19, 1978

    Introduction Plaintiff, a white male, is a medical doctor, a board-certified psychiatrist, and a board-certified mental health administrator. In July, 1974 he was appointed Assistant Superintendent of St. … V 1975). Section 2000e-16 is the exclusive remedy for federal employees complaining of employment discrimination. Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Boston & Maine Corp. v. National Mediation Board

    695 F. Supp. 571 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 1987

    Such a result might of course render moot any action taken by the Mediation Board. … Since the action pending before the United States District Court for Maine could have such a profound impact on the outcome of this matter, I am not going to order that the Mediation Board commence mediation.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Berry v. McCarthy

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 2021

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LYNN BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 374 (1998) (cleaned up). As a military review board, the ABCMR is entitled to even greater deference than civilian administrative agencies. Coe v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Miami Free Zone Corp. v. Foreign-Trade Zones Board

    803 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 8, 1992

    While the complaint is somewhat general, it attacks the action of the Board in granting a new FTZ which allegedly threatens to affect the business of an FTZ previously authorized and awarded by the Board to plaintiff in the … The FTZ Act is silent as to whether a Board action authorizing an FTZ is reviewable by any court.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Energy Research Foundation v. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

    734 F. Supp. 27 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 1990

    In determining whether the board is an agency this Court must follow the “sole function test,” enunciated in Soucie v. David, 448 F.2d 1067 (D.C.Cir.1971). See also Washington Research Project v. … Department of Health, Education and Welfare, supra; Public Citizen Health v. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, supra; Pacific Legal Foundation v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Caldwell v. Employees Workers Compensation Appeals Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 3, 2018

    See, e.g., Spinelli v. Goss, 446 F.3d 159, 161 (D.C. … CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board's motion to dismiss Mr. Caldwell's complaint for lack of jurisdiction.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • CityFed Financial Corp. v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

    615 F. Supp. 1122 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 1985

    FAIC Securities, Inc. v. … As the Supreme Court stated in Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • BOARD OF SUP'RS OF FAIRFAX CTY., VA. v. McLucas

    410 F. Supp. 1052 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 1976

    EDF v. Butterfield (DDC, C.A. 74-217). 9 . … See: EDF v. EPA, 158 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 485 F.2d 780 , 783 (1973). 15 . See: Oljato Chapter of the Navajo Tribe v. Train, 169 U.S.App.D.C. 195 , 515 F.2d 654 (1975). 16 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Carson v. United States Merit Systems Protection Board

    534 F. Supp. 2d 94 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2008

    . § 552 , against the United States Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB” or the “Board”). … See Tijerina v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Consumers Union of U.S., Inc. v. Federal Reserve Board

    736 F. Supp. 337 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 2, 1990

    Indus, v. Block, 643 F.Supp. 1256, 1266 (N.D.Cal. 1986); see also Short Haul Survival Comm. v. … The need for deference is all the more compelling where the Board is not only charged with administering the statute, Udall v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.