Case law

United Black Fund, Inc. v. Hampton

352 F. Supp. 898 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 24, 1972

Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (June 29, 1972).

United States v. Ab Electrolux

139 F. Supp. 3d 390 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 2015

Intervet, Inc. v. Merial Ltd., 241 F.R.D. 55, 57 (D.D.C. 2007). … See Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 1470 (9th Cir. 1992). Intervenors’ objections to each of the four counsel identified by GE will be discussed in turn. A. Sharis A.

Richardson v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc.

623 F. Supp. 350 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 26, 1985

See, e.g., O’Toole v. Arlington Trust Co., 681 F.2d 94, 96 (1st Cir.1982); Robbins v. First American Bank of Virginia, 514 F.Supp. 1183, 1189-91 (N.D.Ill.1981); Hibernia Bank v. … See, e.g., Dames & Moore v. Regan, 453 U.S. 654, 689 , 101 S.Ct. 2972, 2991 , 69 L.Ed.2d 918 (1981); Hodel v.

Payne v. Biden

District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 2022

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … More specifically, in Elgin v.

Sharma v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

58 F. Supp. 3d 59 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 17, 2014

Calhoun v. Johnson, 632 F.3d 1259, 1261 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (quoting Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986)). … Feinstein v. Lewis, 477 F.

Rasekh v. Veneman

357 F. Supp. 2d 70 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 6, 2004

Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). III. … Tanoue, 133 F.Supp.2d 84, 89 (D.D.C.2001) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999)). Rasekh has not' met this prima facie burden of production.

Zhang v. Hotel Fortune

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 7, 2025

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 499 (D.D.C. 1977); see also Unfoldment, Inc. v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 07-cv-1717 (HHK), 2007 WL 3125236, at *2 (D.D.C. … West v. Geithner, 427 F. App’x 9, 9 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 556 n.3 (2007)). It is simply “too convoluted and too confusing to require Defendants to respond.” Rogler v.

Nanko Shipping, USA v. Alcoa, Inc.

107 F. Supp. 3d 174 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 5, 2015

Together, Alcoa Inc. and Rio Tinto own a majority of the shares of Halco, and the three Consortium Members “comprise the Halco Board of Directors.” 4 Id. ¶¶ 5-6. … Plaintiffs fail to explain how three corporations can comprise the Halco board of directors, when boards of directors are composed of individuals.

United States v. International Union

89 F. Supp. 179 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 1950

Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Company, 221 U.S. 418, 444 , 31 S.Ct. 492 , 55 L.Ed. 797 , 34 L.R.A.,N.S., 874. … Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 8 Cir., 137 F.2d 77, 79 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Standard Trouser Co., 4 Cir., 162 F.2d 1012, 1014 .

Electronic Privacy Information Center v. the United States Deptment of Homeland Security

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 12, 2011

Indeed, more recently, in Brown v. … Similarly, in Brown v.

Szymkowicz v. Frisch

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 2020

Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”), and, ultimately, the D.C. Court of Appeals. Id.; see generally In re Szymkowicz I, 124 A.3d 1078. The D.C. … Co. v.

Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Reich

978 F. Supp. 338 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 1997

City of Kansas City v. Department of Housing and Urban Dev., 923 F.2d 188, 191 (D.C.Cir.1991). … The National Labor Relations Board has not yet rendered its decision. 4 .

Neff v. Waller

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 2009

He alleges that in response to his Freedom oflnformation Act ("FOIA") request for a document, DOC referred him to the Illinois Prisoner Review Board, which, in tum, has not responded to his request. … See Johnson v. Executive Office for United States Attorneys, 310 F.3d 771, 777 (D.C. Cir. 2002). 2

In Re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation

266 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 2017

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). I. … Fed’n of Gov’t Emps. v. OPM, Case No. 15-1015, Compl. [Dkt. # 1] ¶ 68; Krippendorf v. OPM, Case No. 15-1321, Compl. [Dkt. # 1] ¶¶ 61, 73; Robbeloth v. OPM, Case No. 15-1449, Compl. [Dkt. # 1] ¶¶ 63, 75; Brown v.

Laker Airways Ltd. v. Pan American World Airways

103 F.R.D. 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 1984

See, e.g., Roller v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 737 F.2d 1038 (D.C.Cir.1984); Board of Education v. Nyquist, 590 F.2d 1241 (2d Cir.1979). . The Canon was adopted by this Court in Local Rule 4-3(IV)(b). . … Woods v. Covington County Bank, supra, 537 F.2d at 810 ; see also Board of Education v. Nyquist, supra, 590 F.2d at 1247 .

Fine v. Giant Food Stores, Inc.

163 F. Supp. 231 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 1958

Similarly, in Brown v. … Brown, the man whose job it was to mop the floor, was not called as a witness.

Christian v. Boulware Jr.

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 12, 2021

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Bennett v. Donovan

74 F. Supp. 3d 382 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 24, 2014

Taucher v. Brown-Hruska, 396 F.3d 1168, 1173 (D.C. Cir. 2005). The government’s position “includ[es] both the underlying agency action and the arguments defending that action in court.” Halverson v. … Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co., 505 U.S. 469, 476 (1992); see also Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 122 (1994) (“A regulation’s age is no antidote to clear inconsistency with a statute . . . .”).

Blake v. Hoston

513 F. Supp. 663 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 9, 1981

No reduction in fee is appropriate where the issue was all part and parcel of one matter, Lamphere v. Brown Univ., 610 F.2d 46, 47 (1st Cir. 1979), but only when the claims asserted “are truly fractionable.” Id. … Blake v. Califano, 626 F.2d 891 (D.C.Cir.1980).

Jackson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

657 F. Supp. 2d 176 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2009

.”); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 250 (D.C.Cir.2002) (stating that a Bivens claim must show that defendants acted under color of federal law). The collection of a sample of plaintiffs DNA is authorized by statute. … See Kaemmerling v.