Case law

Rochon v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

691 F. Supp. 1548 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 11, 1988

For support, they point to Brown v. … Langster v. Schweiker, 565 F.Supp. 407, 414 (N.D.Ill.1983). In Langster , the Court noted that nothing in Brown v.

Back Country Horsemen of America v. Johanns

438 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2006

Federal Aviation Administration, 156 F.3d 1329, 1332 (D.C.Cir.1998) (quoting Pierce, 487 U.S. 552 , 566 n. 2, 108 S.Ct. 2541 , 101 L.Ed.2d 490 ); Taucher v. Brown-Hruska, 396 F.3d 1168, 1172 (D.C.Cir.2005). … Wrecking Corp. v. Sec. of Labor, 364 F.3d 321 , 326-27 (D.C.Cir.2004)); see also United States v. Hallmark Constr.

AERA ENERGY LLC v. Salazar

691 F. Supp. 2d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2010

Over two years ago, the Interior Board of Land Appeals (“IBLA”), an administrative appeals board in the U.S. … Sierra Club v. Hodel, 737 F.Supp. 629, 638 (D.Utah 1990).

United States v. Hoag

142 F. Supp. 667 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 6, 1956

The first was Brown v. … In an opinion by Chief Justice Vinson, the Court, referring to Brown v.

Swanson Group Mfg. LLC v. Salazar

951 F. Supp. 2d 75 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 2013

See Chrysler Corp. v. … Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 301-02 (1979) (only "substantive" or "legislative-type rules" have the force and effect of law). 11 To determine whether an 11The government does not attempt to characterize the OEM as one or more of

Electronic Privacy Information Center v. the United States Deptment of Homeland Security

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 12, 2011

Indeed, more recently, in Brown v. … Similarly, in Brown v.

Brandenburg, Sr. v. U.S. Department of State

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 11, 2023

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. … See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Moreover, in evaluating subject matter jurisdiction, the court “may consider materials outside the pleadings.” Am. Freedom Law Ctr. v.

Shaw v. Esper

District Court, District of Columbia · May 7, 2021

See O’Donnell v. Barry, 148 F.3d 1126, 1139–42 (D.C. Cir. 1998); Doe v. DOJ, 753 F.2d 1092, 1104–12 (D.C. Cir. 1985); see also Jefferson v. Harris, 170 F. … See, e.g., Spadone v. McHugh, 842 F.

Schneider v. Rusk

218 F. Supp. 302 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 1963

In Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez and in Rusk v. … Perez v.

MacBride Nig. Limited v. Federal Maritime Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 26, 2013

Brown v. D.C., 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008). … See Bennet v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154, 177-78 (1997).

In Re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation

266 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 2017

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). I. … Fed’n of Gov’t Emps. v. OPM, Case No. 15-1015, Compl. [Dkt. # 1] ¶ 68; Krippendorf v. OPM, Case No. 15-1321, Compl. [Dkt. # 1] ¶¶ 61, 73; Robbeloth v. OPM, Case No. 15-1449, Compl. [Dkt. # 1] ¶¶ 63, 75; Brown v.

Williams v. Walker

806 F. Supp. 2d 246 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 2011

Williams, a former Senior Trial Attorney at the Government Accountability Office (“GAO” or “the Agency”) Personnel Appeals Board (“PAB” or “Board”) in the Office of the General Counsel (“PAB/OGC”), brings this action against … Barnabas v. Board of Trustees of University of District of Columbia, 686 F.

Nanko Shipping, USA v. Alcoa, Inc.

107 F. Supp. 3d 174 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 5, 2015

Together, Alcoa Inc. and Rio Tinto own a majority of the shares of Halco, and the three Consortium Members “comprise the Halco Board of Directors.” 4 Id. ¶¶ 5-6. … Plaintiffs fail to explain how three corporations can comprise the Halco board of directors, when boards of directors are composed of individuals.

United Black Fund, Inc. v. Hampton

352 F. Supp. 898 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 24, 1972

Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (June 29, 1972).

Bennett v. Donovan

74 F. Supp. 3d 382 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 24, 2014

Taucher v. Brown-Hruska, 396 F.3d 1168, 1173 (D.C. Cir. 2005). The government’s position “includ[es] both the underlying agency action and the arguments defending that action in court.” Halverson v. … Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co., 505 U.S. 469, 476 (1992); see also Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 122 (1994) (“A regulation’s age is no antidote to clear inconsistency with a statute . . . .”).

Kas v. Financial General Bankshares, Inc.

617 F. Supp. 288 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 1985

Boyertown Burial Casket Company v. Amedco, Inc., 407 F.Supp. 811 (E.D.Pa.1976). … In Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v.

Richardson v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc.

623 F. Supp. 350 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 26, 1985

See, e.g., O’Toole v. Arlington Trust Co., 681 F.2d 94, 96 (1st Cir.1982); Robbins v. First American Bank of Virginia, 514 F.Supp. 1183, 1189-91 (N.D.Ill.1981); Hibernia Bank v. … See, e.g., Dames & Moore v. Regan, 453 U.S. 654, 689 , 101 S.Ct. 2972, 2991 , 69 L.Ed.2d 918 (1981); Hodel v.

Sharma v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

58 F. Supp. 3d 59 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 17, 2014

Calhoun v. Johnson, 632 F.3d 1259, 1261 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (quoting Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986)). … Feinstein v. Lewis, 477 F.

Payne v. Biden

District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 2022

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … More specifically, in Elgin v.

Rasekh v. Veneman

357 F. Supp. 2d 70 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 6, 2004

Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). III. … Tanoue, 133 F.Supp.2d 84, 89 (D.D.C.2001) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999)). Rasekh has not' met this prima facie burden of production.