Case law

Williams v. Verizon Washington, D.C., Inc.

322 F.R.D. 145 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 2017

Samuels v. Wilder, 906 F.2d 272, 275 (7th Cir. 1990). … Date: August 31, 2017 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Fay v. Holder

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2011

See Fay v. Chester, No. 10-3225, 2011 WL 397720 (10th Cir. … See Ojo v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 106 F.3d 680, 683 (5th Cir. 1997); Taylor v. U.S. Board oj Parole, 194 F.2d 882, 883 (D.C. Cir. 1952).

Waka LLC v. Dc Kickball

517 F. Supp. 2d 245 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 2007

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). Dismissal is not appropriate unless the “plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Conley v. … Because the antitrust laws “were enacted for the ‘protection of competition, not competitors, ’ ” id. at 488 , 97 S.Ct. 690 (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v.

National Council on the Facts of Overpopulation v. Caplin

224 F. Supp. 313 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 1963

The code is also characterized as “discriminatory,” because other types of non-profit groups (such as chamber’s of commerce, boards of trade, etc. mentioned in § 501(c) (6)) are allowed to enjoy tax exemption and are still … Eastern States Petroleum Corporation v. Rogers, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 63 , 280 F.2d 611 (1960) cert. denied 364 U.S. 891 , 81 S.Ct. 222 , 5 L.Ed.2d 187 (1960).

Hudson v. American Federation of Government Employees

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2018

S o cialist Labor Party v. … DATE: March 2, 2018 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Hemphill v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.

530 F. Supp. 2d 108 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 3, 2008

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Evans v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp., No. 04-2185, 2007 WL 902306 , at * 1 (D.D.C. Mar.23, 2007) (citing Day v. Moscow, 955 F.2d 807, 811 (2d Cir.1992)); Stanton v.

Salmeron v. District of Columbia

113 F. Supp. 3d 263 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 9, 2015

Mann v. Castiel, 681 F.3d 368, 372 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (citation omitted). … Light v. Wolf, 816 F.2d 746, 751 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also Paolone v. Muller, 05–cv–2300(JDB), 2006 WL 2346448, at *2 (D.D.C.

Northeast Savings, F.A. v. Director, Office of Thrift Supervision

770 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 1991

Preseault v. … As the Supreme Court explained in Blanchette v.

Banks v. Lappin

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 2009

See Taylor v. United States Board of Parole, 194 F.2d 882, 883 (D.C. … . § 225 5); Ojo v.

Crosson v. Shalala

907 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 13, 1995

. § 404.1520 (1983); see Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 705-706 (D.C.Cir.1986). … Davis v. Heckler, 566 F.Supp. 1193, 1195 (D.D.C.1983). 3.

Smith v. Dalton

971 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 1997

The Supreme Court has suggested in Baldwin County Welcome Center v. … Mondy v. Secretary of the Army, 845 F.2d 1051, 1057 (D.C.Cir.1988). Plaintiff has the burden of pleading and proving any equitable reasons for his failure to meet the 90-day time limit. See Saltz v.

United States v. Leake

District Court, District of Columbia · May 10, 2020

See United States v. Hunt, 240 F. … Date: May 10, 2020 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Ritchie v. Napolitano

196 F. Supp. 3d 54 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 11, 2016

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999), abrogated on other grounds by Steele v. Schafer, 535 F.3d 689 (D.C. Cir. 2008). … Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835 (1976); see also Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 542 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (“The Title VII remedy declared exclusive for federal employees in Brown v.

Jones v. Frank

142 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 1992

Bayer v. Dep’t of the Treasury, 956 F.2d 330 (D.C.Cir.1992). See also Jarrell v. United States Postal Serv., 753 F.2d 1088, 1091 (D.C.Cir.1985); Saltz v. Lehman, 672 F.2d 207, 208 (D.C.Cir.1982); Mondy v. … Gomez v. Trustees of Harvard University, 677 F.Supp. 23, 25 (D.D.C.1988).

Rivers v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2025

FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 475 (1994). … See Brown v. Argenbright Sec., Inc., 782 A.2d 752, 760 (D.C. 2001). Here, there’s no allegation that the prosecutors acted dangerously or incompetently.

Lewis v. District of Columbia Police Department

271 F. Supp. 3d 177 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 20, 2017

See Wilson v. U.S. Dep’t of Transp., 759 F.Supp.2d 55, 62 (D.D.C. 2011). It is plaintiffs burden to establish that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over his claim. See Khadr v. … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (internal quotation marks omitted)). “A Rule 12(b)(6) motion tests the legal sufficiency of a complaint[.]” Browning v.

Miskill v. Lehman

566 F. Supp. 1486 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 1983

She brought this claim before the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in 1980, requesting that the Board correct her military record to reflect that she was not discharged in 1973 from regular service but continued … Baxter v. Claytor, supra at 185.

Dowell v. Colvin

232 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 11, 2017

DATE: January 11, 2017 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge … , (g); 416.920(a)(4)(v), (g) (emphasis added).

Lopez-Pena v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2019

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, a prisoner at Allenwood Federal Correctional Institution, located in White Deer, Pennsylvania, sues the President of the United States, the U.S.

Uqdah v. District of Columbia

785 F. Supp. 1015 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 21, 1992

Under Celotex Corporation v. … The District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review affirmed that Cornrows “is operating a beauty shop and offering cosmetology services," Taalib-Din Abdul Uqdah v.