Case law

Harper v. Kleindienst

362 F. Supp. 742 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 16, 1973

Perkins v. Mathews, 400 U.S. 379, 385 , 91 S.Ct. 431 , 27 L.Ed.2d 476 (1971); Evers v. … Perkins v. Kleindienst, C.A. 1309-72 (D.D.C. Nov. 2, 1972); Evers v. State Board of Election Commissioners, supra; Contra, Common Cause v. Mitchell, C.A. 2348-71 (D.D.C.

McKeown v. DOJ

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 19, 2023

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). “A confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr. Corp., 71 F. … Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973); see also Sargeant v. Dixon, 130 F.3d 1067, 1069 (D.C. Cir. 1997); Powell v. Katzenbach, 359 F.2d 234, 234–35 (D.C. Cir. 1965); Sattler v.

Schneider v. Rusk

218 F. Supp. 302 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 1963

In Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez and in Rusk v. … Perez v.

Chen v. Biden

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 2, 2022

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). It also assists the Court in determining whether it has jurisdiction over the subject matter.

Rem-Cru Titanium, Inc. v. Watson

152 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 17, 1957

See Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co., 270 U.S. 390 , 46 S.Ct. 324 , 70 L.Ed. 651 ; Gillman v. Stern, 2 Cir, 1940, 114 F.2d 28 ; Matheson v. … Kroll is a foreign publication and in Seymour v.

LGH, LTD. v. Sullivan

786 F. Supp. 1047 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 1992

If the provider is dissatisfied with the intermediary’s determination and the amount in controversy is $10,000 or more, the provider may appeal to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (“PRRB” or the “Board”), a five-member … Agnes Hospital v. Sullivan, 905 F.2d 1563 (D.C.Cir.1990); Beverly Hospital v. Bowen, 872 F.2d 483 (D.C.Cir.1989); Georgetown University Hospital v. Bowen, 862 F.2d 323 (D.C.Cir.1988); PIA-Asheville, Inc. v.

Alexian Brothers Medical Center v. Kathleen Sebelius

63 F. Supp. 3d 105 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 12, 2014

McDaniel v. U.S.C.I.A., No. 08-2244, 2008 WL 5423259, at *1 (D.D.C. … Mfg., Inc. v. Woodhouse, 219 F.R.D. 2, 6 (D.D.C. 2003).

Frank v. Brownell

149 F. Supp. 928 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 4, 1957

On appeal, the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed the decision of the special inquiry officer. … Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro, 349 U.S. 48 , 75 S.Ct. 591 , 99 L.Ed. 868 .

United States Ex Rel. Miller v. Bill Harbert International Construction, Inc.

505 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 14, 2007

Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). … Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984).

Lattimore v. Municipality of Columbus

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 6, 2026

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The instant Complaint is neither short nor plain, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), the allegations cannot be described as simple, concise, and direct, see Fed. R. … See Sindram v. Suda, 986 F.2d 1459, 1460 (D.C. Cir. 1993); see also Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 9 (1991); see also Caldwell v. Kagan, 865 F.

AERA ENERGY LLC v. Salazar

691 F. Supp. 2d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2010

Over two years ago, the Interior Board of Land Appeals (“IBLA”), an administrative appeals board in the U.S. … Sierra Club v. Hodel, 737 F.Supp. 629, 638 (D.Utah 1990).

United States v. Gross

222 F. Supp. 3d 83 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 2, 2016

Thompson, 682 F.3d 285, 289 (3d Cir. 2010); United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 338 (4th Cir. 2011); United States v. Smith, 658 F.3d 608, 611 (6th Cir. 2011); United States v. … Dixon, 687 F.3d 356, 359 (7th Cir. 2012); United States v. Browne, 698 F.3d 1042, 1045 (8th Cir. 2012); United States v. Austin, 676 F.3d 924, 927 (9th Cir. 2012); United States v.

Carleton v. Watson

151 F. Supp. 613 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 1957

Levin v. Coe, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 347 , 132 F.2d 589 . … Broderson v. Marzall, 90 U.S. App.D.C. 78, 194 F.2d 138 .

Smalls v. Bilden

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2018

Peavy v. United States, 128 F. Supp. 3d 85, 99 (D.D.C. 2015) (quoting Chenault v. McHugh, 968 F. … Co. v.

Gray v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

73 F.R.D. 638 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 15, 1977

October 10, 1973); but see Fujishima v. Board of Educ., 460 F.2d 1355, 1360 (7th Cir. 1972). . See, e. g., Berlin Democratic Club v. Rumsfeld, 410 F.Supp. 144, 163-64 (D.D.C.1976); Coffin v. … Board of Educ., 460 F.2d 1355, 1360 (7th Cir. 1972). . This question was raised at oral argument and was not satisfactorily resolved by counsel for either side.

Jenkins v. Brill

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2018

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Murton v. Ladd

230 F. Supp. 563 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 25, 1964

Co. et al. v. Ooms, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 76 , 154 F.2d 857 (1946). … Esso Standard Oil Company v. Sun Oil Company, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 154 , 229 F.2d 37, 41-42 (1956), Abbott et al. v. Coe, 71 U.S.App.D.C. 195 , 197-198, 109 F.2d 449, 451-452 (1939).

United States v. Winecoff

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 2021

Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 50 (1979). Furthermore, a Fourth Amendment seizure occurs “when a person submits to an officer’s ‘show of authority.’” United States v. Brodie, 742 F.3d 1058, 1061 (D.C. … Def.’s Suppl. at 9 (quoting United States v. Brown, 925 F.3d 1150, 1156 (9th Cir. 2019)).

Newport Aeronautical Sales v. Department of the Air Force

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 7, 2009

In that case, the Railroad Retirement Board denied a FOIA request pursuant to Section 12(d) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA), 45 U.S.C. § 351 et seq, which read: Information obtained by the Board … (ii) the Board may disclose such information in cases in which the Board finds that such disclosure is clearly in furtherance of the interest of the employee or his estate; . . . .

Farooq Ex Rel. Estate of Farooq v. Mdrb Corp.

498 F. Supp. 2d 284 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 2007

Brown v. Argenbright Sec., Inc., 782 A.2d 752, 760 (D.C.2001) (quoting Giles v. Shell Oil Corp., 487 A.2d 610, 613 (D.C.1985)). … Parker v.