Case law

Jason Guanro

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 2022

In Clapper v. … Brown v. Corp., No. 14-cv-1220, 2015 WL 5923541, at *1 (D. Conn. Oct. 9, 2015) (citation omitted). Zia M.

Saint Vincent Indianapolis Hospital v. Kathleen Sebelius

134 F. Supp. 3d 238 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2015

BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed suit appealing the decisions of the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (“PRRB”) under 42 U.S.C. § 139500. Compl., ECF No. 1. … Bowen, 485 U.S. 399, 401 (1988). 4 Provider Reimbursement Review Board. 5 See Little Company of Mary Hosp. and Health Care Centers v. Shalala, 24 F.3d 984 (7th Cir. 1994) (“Little Co.

Jackson v. District of Columbia

672 F. Supp. 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 1987

Malley v. … Bernard Parish School Bd., 803 F.2d 129, 134 (5th Cir.1986); Rodriguez v. Board of Ed. of Eastchester Union Free School Dist., 620 F.2d 362, 366 (2d Cir.1980); Rowley v. McMillan, 502 F.2d 1326, 1332 (4th Cir.1974).

Perkins v. Fort Lincoln II Condominium Association

District Court, District of Columbia · May 27, 2011

Bell promptly sent an email to the Association’s board and called board member Leila Odom to complain. That evening, Ms. Odom sent an email to Mr. … The board of directors for the corporation operating the facilities refused the assignment. The plaintiff contested the board’s decision and was expelled. See Sullivan, 396 U.S. at 235.

McKesson Corporation v. Iran, the Islamic Re

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 23, 2010

McKesson V, 539 F.3d at 491. … See LaShawn A. v. Barry, 87 F.3d 1389, 1393 (D.C.

National Wildlife Federation v. Clark

577 F. Supp. 825 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 1984

In either event, the Board had to take a judicially reviewable initiative. … See National Wildlife Federation v. Watt, 571 F.Supp. at 1158.

Laurent v. Bureau of Rehabilitation, Inc.

544 F. Supp. 2d 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 14, 2008

See Alexander v. … See Burton v. Batista, 339 F.Supp.2d 97, 111 (D.D.C. 2004); Amiri v. Stoladi Prop.

Lovely-Coley v. District of Columbia

255 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 9, 2017

Supp. 2d 1, 8 (D.D.C. 2011); see also United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 285 F.R.D. 133, 136 (D.D.C. 2012) (“If the party was not diligent, the inquiry should end.” … Supp. 749, 752 n.9 (D.D.C. 1990))); see also Brown v. FBI, 744 F. Supp. 2d 120, 123 (D.D.C. 2010) (same).

Wise v. United States

145 F. Supp. 3d 53 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 17, 2015

Here, the Federal Reserve Board is a federal agency for FTCA purposes. See 28 U.S.C. … Ctr., 121 A.3d 59, 75 (D.C. 2015); “a gap of six to seven inches between boards” covering a large trench into which a pedestrian could fall, see Bostic v.

General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Brenner

257 F. Supp. 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 1966

It appears from the decision of the Board of Appeals in each application that plaintiff did not contend before that tribunal that Bartley does not disclose the subject matter of the claims. … Watson v. Bersworth et al., 102 U.S.App.D.C. 187 , 251 F.2d 898 (1958). 2.

PHRASAVANG v. Deutsche Bank

656 F. Supp. 2d 196 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 2009

Macharia, 334 F.3d at 64, 67 ; Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . *201 C.

Wigfall v. Office of Compliance

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 18, 2018

Kowal v. MCI Commc’ns Corp., 16 F.3d 1271, 1276 (D.C. Cir. 1994); see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002); Ctr. for Responsible Sci. v. Gottlieb, 311 F. Supp. 3d 5, 8 (D.D.C. 2018). … This incident was mentioned in the negative performance evaluation.”); id. at 9 (“I believe that John Uelemen [sic] and/or Amy Dunning misinformed the OOC Board about an inspection, and, they claimed, as a result the Board

Rodriguez v. District of Columbia

118 F. Supp. 3d 132 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2015

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Union v. Reagan, 509 F.

Alabama Association of Realtors v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2021

Two other district courts, however, declined to enjoin the CDC Order at the preliminary injunction stage, see Brown v. … Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014) (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000) (emphasis added)); Am. Lung Ass’n v. EPA, 985 F.3d 914, 959 (D.C. Cir. 2021) (collecting cases).

Pierre-Noel v. Bridges Public Charter School

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 6, 2023

Emery v. Roanoke City Sch. … Secretary of 1972 Times (News) Browne, Mr.

Davis v. Berryhill

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 2020

STANDARD OF REVIEW The District Court must affirm an ALJ’s decision that is supported by “substantial evidence” in the record. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 705 (D.C. Cir. 1986). … Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971) (quoting Cons. Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)).

Copeland v. District of Columbia

208 F. Supp. 3d 255 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2016

See, e.g., Merrick v. D.C., 134 F.Supp.3d 328, 339 (D.D.C.2015); Thomas v. D.C., 908 F.Supp.2d 233, 248 (D.D.C.2012); Young v. D.C., 893 F.Supp.2d 125, 131 (D.D.C.2012); Cox v. … D.C., 792 F.3d 112, 116-17 (D.C.Cir.2015) (Brown, J., concurring) ("[T]he Laffey Matrix rate [is] an irrelevant benchmark for [IDEA] administrative proceedings before a D.C. Public Schools officer.”) and Reed v.

Hunter v. District of Columbia Government

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2012

Id.; see Brown v. Brody , 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1991). … See Brown v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp. Medstar Health, 828 F.

United States v. United States Gypsum Co.

53 F. Supp. 889 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 1943

Upon these license agreements the defendants themselves rely as properly establishing prices and terms of sale of gypsum board within the doctrine of United States v. … Commonwealth v.

Schermerhorn v. State of Israel

235 F. Supp. 3d 249 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 25, 2017

On May 31, 2010, as the flotilla approached the shore, the Israeli navy took action to enforce the blockade of the Gaza Strip and board the vessels. 4 According to the complaint, the boarding of the Challenger I was marked … Plaintiffs allege that “at least one stun grenade was used before the IDF soldiers sought to board” the ship. Id. ¶ 41.