Case law

Charlotte Housing for the Elderly v. Cuomo

89 F. Supp. 2d 70 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2000

HUD clearly asserted its position that the vouchers had not been filed early on, and provided the plaintiffs with numerous opportunities to submit evidence to contradict HUD’s position. … Owners qualified for the greater of the 30 percent baseline figure, or 100 percent of the difference between adjustments they actually received and adjustments calculated under the new formula established in § 801(a)(1).

Burton v. District of Columbia

153 F. Supp. 3d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 2015

With these principles in mind, judicial estoppel is clearly warranted in the present case. … ,’ ‘substantially more qualified,’ or ‘significantly better qualified’ than the successful candidate.”

In Re Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litigation

295 F. Supp. 2d 30 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 17, 2003

We do not think more is required to establish Blue Cross's right to sue to collect these overcharges." Id. at 1414 . … This is clearly set forth in Plaintiffs' Complaints. Complaint* ¶¶ 36-48; Complaint ¶¶ 20-32.

Sierra Club v. Tennessee Valley Authority

905 F. Supp. 2d 356 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 29, 2012

Cir. 1946) (finding that the TVA was “clearly not domestic to the District of Columbia” and their D.C. … This Court holds that the TVA has enough of the qualities of a private corporation to qualify for the governmental contacts exception—an exception which, in this case, applies to keep this Court from finding personal jurisdiction

Grace v. Sessions

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 2018

To the extent Matter of A-B- was interpreting the “particular social group” requirement in the INA, the Chevron framework clearly applies. … First, a directive to ignore circuit precedent when doing so would violate the principles of Brand X itself is clearly unlawful.

United States v. Washington

District Court, District of Columbia · May 23, 2022

Until an event in the defendant's case "clearly shows that diligence is in order,"§ 2255(f)(4) will not apply. Id. Though the D.C. … And case law established that equitable tolling was not warranted. The Court finds that no -reasonable jurist could debate these conclusions. B.

Martin County, Florida v. Department of Transportation

110 F. Supp. 3d 59 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 2015

They also contend that the project does not qualify for tax-exempt financing under the applicable federal statute. … Given AAF’s stated commitment to moving forward with or without the PABs; the substantial investments that AAF has already made in the project and its access to further funding sources; and the counties’ failure clearly

Ingram v. District of Columbia Child and Family Services Agency

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 2021

Ingram’s ADA and DCHRA Claims The ADA proscribes any actions that “discriminate against a qualified individual on the basis of disability in regard to” the “discharge of employees” or the “privileges of employment … Cir. 2019) (explaining that “mere temporal proximity” without more cannot establish retaliation, because otherwise “protected activities would effectively grant employees a period of immunity, during which no act, however

Ibrahim v. Titan Corp.

556 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 2007

The agreement did make clear, however, that “[contractor personnel must adhere to the standards of conduct established by the operational or unit commander.” Statement of Work at C-1.8.4. … Analysis Titan Serving as a translator for the interrogation of persons detained by the U.S. military in a combat zone is an activity that clearly has a “direct connection with actual hostilities.”

Blackmon v. Astrue

719 F. Supp. 2d 80 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 2010

In step three, the ALJ compares the impairments to a listing of impairments that automatically qualify as a disability under the regulations. … The examining physician also found no established postural, manipulative, visual, communicative, or environmental limitations. Id. at 196-98 .

United States v. Blackley

986 F. Supp. 607 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 12, 1997

The court answered the question in the affirmative, stating, “Clearly, the answer is yes. It cannot be denied that the congressional investigation itself ‘arose from’ the events constituting the Iran-Contra initiative.” … In recognition of the need to have safeguards against potential abuse while at the same time recognizing the special role of the Independent Counsel, section 594(f) includes the crucial qualifier “to the extent possible”

Brewer v. District of Columbia

105 F. Supp. 3d 74 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 2015

The Superior Court disagreed, granting summary judgment to DCPS on the grounds that the record clearly established that DCPS had implemented the terminations in response to budgetary constraints—i.e., that the employment … See In re Estate of McKenney, 953 A.2d 336, 342 (D.C. 2008) (explaining that, among other things, a plaintiff seeking to establish fraudulent misrepresentation must establish “a false representation”).

Shoaie v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 2024

The I-130 form is intended to establish that the petitioner has a qualifying relationship with an eligible relative. Id. … Circuit clearly held that its unpublished decisions are bind- ing precedent. See Verizon v. FCC, 770 F.3d 961, 968 n.11 (D.D.C. 2014) (noting the tension between D.C. Cir.

Sierra Club v. Van Antwerp

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 2010

Destroying the habitats of the Indigo Snake and the Wood Stork clearly may adversely affect these protected species. … Therefore, the applicant had the duty to rebut the presumption of practicable alternatives by clearly demonstrating that a practicable alternative was unavailable.

Texas Children's Hospital v. Burwell

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2018

Plaintiffs also “serve many . . . very sick and medically fragile children,” meaning that 2 “they have an unusual number of patients who meet the qualifying criteria for Medicaid eligibility … As discussed above, the 2008 Rule clearly defines what is included in calculating “uncompensated care costs.” See supra III.A.2.

Potts v. Howard University Hospital

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 2010

[he] ‘was qualified for a job for which the employer was seeking applicants’” (emphasis added) (quoting McDonnell Douglas, 411 U.S. at 802)). … “Such an action must be firmly anchored in either the Constitution or in a statute or 14 regulation which clearly reflects the particular ‘public policy’ being relied

Sabino Canyon Tours, Inc. v. Usda Forest Service

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 8, 2018

SCT has failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on these claims because (1) it has not clearly established that it is challenging final agency action and (2) it has not shown the Service acted arbitrarily and capriciously … SCT has not established a particularized, concrete injury.

District of Columbia v. United States Department of Commerce

789 F. Supp. 1179 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 3, 1992

Congress for many years has been deeply involved in the establishment of the facility at Lorton. … But retention of control and management, despite United States ownership, does not automatically qualify a property as “unique” such that it deserves different rules for the Census enumeration.

Takeda Pharmaceuticals, U.S.A., Inc. v. Burwell

78 F. Supp. 3d 65 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 2015

Mem. at 5) — qualify as the type of reliance that Congress intended to give rise to the patent certification obligation. 17 2. … Takeda has not established that the APA requires anything more. . C.

American Hawaii Cruises v. Skinner

713 F. Supp. 452 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 18, 1989

This appears to be a gap in the law, which is clearly inconsistent with traditional policy. … It is contemplated that in administering requirements for U.S. fishing, fish processing, and fish tender vessels to be rebuilt in the United States, the Coast Guard will rely on precedents established by its letter rulings