Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.75s
District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 7, 2022
P. 8(a)(1)–(2); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677–78 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff’s claims against Bevin and DeSantis do not meet the Rule 8(a) standard.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America v. District of Columbia
406 F. Supp. 2d 56 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 2005
In Pfizer Inc v. Dr. … *68 ers Corp. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedStedman v. Federal Communications Commision
District Court, District of Columbia · May 23, 2023
Cir. 2019) (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (internal quotation marks omitted)). … Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972); Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 2010
After boarding an Amtrak train headed for New York, Dupree took the money from Martin and “placed it in her eyeglass case for safekeeping.” Compl. ¶ 18. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). A complaint must present “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face” and “above the speculative level.”
Cited 0 timesPublished764 F. Supp. 194 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 1991
The court in Milone v. … The court in Yablonski v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedHarris v. Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2021
Co. v. … Lottery Board spoke in his official capacity when reporting financial misconduct to Lottery Board officials).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2010
Stewart v. Evans, 275 F.3d 1126, 1135 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Brown, 199 F.3d at 457). … See Brown v. Paulson, 597 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLozada Colon v. US Dept. of State
2 F. Supp. 2d 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 23, 1998
(b)(l) (review of loss of nationality by the Board) or 8 U.S.C. § 1503 (review of loss of a right or privilege attendant to citizenship because of the determination that the individual is no longer a national). … Id.; see also Afroyim v. Rusk, 387 U.S. 253 , 87 S.Ct. 1660 , 18 L.Ed.2d 757 (1967); Vance v. Terrazas, 444 U.S. 252 , 100 S.Ct. 540 , 62 L.Ed.2d 461 (1980).
Cited 12 timesPublished260 F. Supp. 320 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 1966
Again the Board stated: “Appellants’ claimed process does not differ from that of Nichols et al. in any substantial procedural aspect.” … There are numerous authorities in this jurisdiction to that effect, the latest of which is Reynolds v. Aghnides, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 28 , 356 F.2d 367 . There are two reasons for this doctrine.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArmenian Assembly of America, Inc. v. Cafesjian
811 F. Supp. 2d 120 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 12, 2011
Cafesjian ultimately resigned from the AGM & M Board of Trustees, designating Waters as his successor. … SEC v. Bilzerian, 729 F.Supp.2d 9, 14 (D.D.C.2010) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
Cited 1 timesPublishedPoblete v. U.S. Marshals Service
207 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2016
NetworkIP, LLC v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 120 (D.C. Cir. 2008), quoting Athens Cmty. Hosp., Inc. v. Schweiker, 686 F.2d 989, 992 (D.C. Cir. 1982). … Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972); Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008), plaintiff’s allegations in this case present “no federal question suitable for decision.” Best, 39 F.3d at 330.
Cited 8 timesPublished815 F. Supp. 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 1993
See, e.g., United States v. … See United States v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedFlynn v. 3900 Watson Place, Inc.
63 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 1999
Parnes v. … In West v.
Cited 6 timesPublished197 F. Supp. 3d 210 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 2016
See id.; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. 5 Cir. 2002). … Mondy v. Sec’y of the Army, 845 F.2d 1051, 1057 (D.C. Cir. 1988), quoting Baldwin Cty. Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 (1984).
Cited 2 timesPublishedJoseph Bancroft & Sons Co. v. Watson
170 F. Supp. 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 1959
Paramount Publix Corporation v. American Tri-Ergon Corporation, 294 U.S. 464, 473 , 55 S.Ct. 449 , 79 L.Ed. 997 ; General Electric Co. v. … Thus, in Radio Corporation of America v.
Cited 5 timesPublished699 F. Supp. 2d 295 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2010
Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446 , 456 *300 (D.C.Cir.1999). In other words, “not everything that makes an employee unhappy is an actionable adverse action.” Russell v. … Jones v. Bernanke, 557 F.3d 670, 678 (D.C.Cir.2009).
Cited 18 timesPublished508 F. Supp. 690 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 6, 1981
Co. v. Waters, 438 U.S. 579 -80, 98 S.Ct. 2950 -51, quoting Griggs v. … They have validated neither the Career Board scoring system nor the non-competitive promotion procedures. See U. S. v. Chicago, 573 F.2d at 425-428 .
Cited 23 timesPublishedPowell v. American Federation of Teachers
District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 22, 2012
Code §§ l-60l .Ol et seq., has pursued these claims administratively as far as an appeal to the Public Employee Relations Board ("PERB"). See Compl., Attach. … Robinson v. District of Columbia, 748 A.Zd 409, 411 (D.C. 2000) (citing Stockard v. M0ss, 706 A.Zd 561, 564 (D.C. 1997)); McManus v. District of Columbl`a, 530 F.
Cited 0 timesPublished238 F. Supp. 638 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 11, 1965
Thompson v. Thompson, supra, Spector v. Weisman, supra. … See 27 Am.Jur., Husband and Wife, § 589; Saunders v. Hill, 202 A.2d 807, 808 (Del.). In Spector v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLeji v. Department of Homeland Security
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2015
Neitzke v. Williams, 490 US. 319, 325 (1989); see Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (DC. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The complaint’s lengthy and often confusing factual allegations do not meet this standard. For the foregoing reasons, this action will be dismissed.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna