Case law

Heade v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2010

EEOC v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial Sch., 117 F.3d 621, 624 (D.C. Cir. 1997). The Court takes judicial notice of the 2008 arbitration opinion and award issued by the WMATA Board of Arbitration. See Camp v. … Kern v. S. Balt. Gen. Hosp., 504 A.2d 1154, 1157 (Md.Ct.Spec.App. 1986); see also Ford v. Rigidply Rafters, Inc., 999 F.

Rgi Events & Public Relations, LLC v. Al Qurm Management Consultancy

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 2019

Johnson–Brown v. 2200 M Street LLC, 257 F. Supp. 2d 175, 177 (D.D.C. 2003) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)). … Fund v. Hormel Foods Corp., 249 F. Supp. 3d 53, 56 (D.D.C. 2017) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Johnson–Brown, 257 F. Supp. 2d at 177). III.

Siegel v. Ridgewells, Inc.

511 F. Supp. 2d 188 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2007

Houlahan v. World Wide Ass’n of Specialty Programs and Schools, 2006 WL 2844190 , at *1 (D.D.C. Sept. 29, 2006) (citing Bennett Enters., Inc. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 45 F.3d 493 , 499 (D.C.Cir.1995)); see also Brown v. … Carr v. Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 84 (D.D.C.1978). Ridgewells, unfortunately, has demonstrated neither here.

Estate of Carolyn Mickens v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2021

See Fontaine v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 42 F. Supp. 3d 102, 107 (D.D.C. 2014) (explaining that courts may dismiss a complaint sua sponte for failure to comply with Rule 8); Brown v. Wash. Metro. … DATE: August 5, 2021 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States Circuit Judge

Duncan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

214 F.R.D. 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 1, 2003

See Douglas v. … In Conrail v.

Hutchinson v. D.C. Public Schools

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 17, 2010

See, e.g., Warren v. United States, 932 F.2d 582, 585 (6th Cir. 1991); Dorsey v. City o/Detroit, 858 F.2d 338,341 (6th Cir. 1988). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). While a plaintiff is not required to "plead law or match facts to every element of a legal theory" in her complaint, Sparrow v.

Leji v. Department of Homeland Security

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2015

Neitzke v. Williams, 490 US. 319, 325 (1989); see Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (DC. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The complaint’s lengthy and often confusing factual allegations do not meet this standard. For the foregoing reasons, this action will be dismissed.

Dickson v. United States

831 F. Supp. 893 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 1993

Id. at 1320 (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)). The Plaintiff provides no statutory support. … Block v. North Dakota, ex rel. Board of University and School Lands, 461 U.S. 273, 280 , 103 S.Ct. 1811, 1816 , 75 L.Ed.2d 840 (1983).

Dasisa v. Howard University

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2010

MIHRETU BULTI DASISA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Naming Howard University Board of Education as the sole defendant, the complaint alleges that events occurring on or about 1998-99 gave rise to claims of discrimination under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972

D&S Consulting, Inc. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2018

In Marra v. Papandreou, the D.C. … The Court notes that if it could reach the issue, the Court would find that the Board would meet the adequacy standard.

Anderson v. Reilly

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2010

Parole Board operated under regulations that were codified in 1987 (" 1987 Guidelines"). … Fletcher v. District of Columbia, 481 F.

Riggs v. Home Builders Institute

203 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2002

by the full board on May 13, 2000. … Brown, 395 A.2d 79 (D.C.1978)).

Spelke v. Gonzales

516 F. Supp. 2d 76 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2007

See Brown, 407 F.Supp.2d at 68 (citing Coleman-Adebayo v. … Brown v. Snow, 407 F.Supp.2d 61 , 67 n. 5 (D.D.C. 2005); Lester v. Natsios, 290 F.Supp.2d 11 , 23 n. 2 (D.D.C.2003) (citing 29 U.S.C. § 791 (g)); see also Bragdon v.

Mohammed Bey v. Bush

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 4, 2012

See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (D.C. Cir. 1994). … Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1010 (D.C. Cir. 2009); see Caldwell v. Kagan, 777 F.

Dorns v. Paulson

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2010

Stewart v. Evans, 275 F.3d 1126, 1135 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Brown, 199 F.3d at 457). … See Brown v. Paulson, 597 F.

Doe v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 30, 2018

Accordingly, a preliminary injunction prohibiting its enforcement “across the board” is proper. Id. … Brown stated that he “trained approximately 250 medical personnel working in Military Entrance Processing Stations (MEPS) throughout the military.” Decl. of George Richard Brown, MD, DFAPA, ECF No. 74-1, ¶ 5.

American Federation of Government Employees, Local 2798 v. Pope

808 F. Supp. 2d 99 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 1, 2011

The FLRA is “intended to play a role in Federal sector labor-management relations analogous to that of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in the private sector.” Turgeon v. Fed. … that the Board lacked jurisdiction over an application for mediation.

Electronic Privacy Information Center v. U.S. Department of Education

48 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 5, 2014

EPIC has a fourteen-member Board of Directors and an Advisory Board with over fifty members. Id. ¶ 14. … The members of the Board of Directors manage the organization and participate in the selection of the Advisory Board. Id. ¶ 15.

In Re All Assets Held in Account Jw3083094 in the Name of Carinalli, S.A. at Jefferies, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 17, 2025

Davis v. D.C., 793 F.3d 120, 127 (D.C. Cir. 2015). … See Taylor v. D.C., 205 F. Supp. 3d 75, 89 (D.D.C. 2016) (“[F]ailure to present an argument to the Magistrate Judge constitutes a waiver of that argument.”); Brown v. D.C., 324 F.

Orfanos v. Department of Health and Human Services

896 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 18, 1995

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420, 1427 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971) (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938)). … See Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit Corp., 42 F.3d 1560, 1580 (10th Cir.1994); *27 State of Kansas v. Shalala, 884 F.Supp. 413, 415 (D.Kan.1995); Lodge Tower Condominium v.