Case law

Alston v. Ncua

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 23, 2021

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678- 79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). When a “complaint [] contains an untidy if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought.

United States v. Butler

253 F. Supp. 3d 133 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 2017

Brown, No. … Brown, No. CR 09-358 (EGS), 2017 WL 1383640, at *8.

Watervale Marine Co., Ltd. v. United States Department of Homeland Security

55 F. Supp. 3d 124 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 2014

)—alleged violations that whistleblowers on board each ship had reported to Coast Guard authorities. … Date: July 18, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Sourgoutsis v. United States Capitol Police

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 9, 2020

Leidos, Inc. v. Hellenic Republic, 881 F.3d 213, 217 (D.C. Cir. 2018) (quoting Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1208 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). … DATE: January 9, 2020 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Smith v. Mbi Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 30, 2019

Brown v. Calz`fano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, a resident of Memphis, Tennessee, sues Danbury Mint (location unidentified) and its parent company, MBI, lnc., incorporated in Delaware. … See Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 356 (1978); Wagshal v. Foster, 28 F.3d 1249, 1252 (D.C. Cir. 1994) (citing cases); Sind)'am v. Suda, 986 F.2d 1459, 1460 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (per curium); Hilska v.

EF Hutton & Co., Inc. v. Burkholder

413 F. Supp. 852 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 1976

See D.C.Code § 15-109; see also Shima v. Brown, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 115 , 133 F.2d 48, 50 (15943). … Milnarik v. M-S Commodities, Inc., 457 F.2d 274 , 275 & n. 1 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 887 , 93 S.Ct. 113 , 34 L.Ed.2d 144 (1972); McCurnin v. Kohlmeyer & Co., 340 F.Supp. 1338 (E.D. La.1972); Sinva, Inc. v.

Medina v. United States Attorney's Office District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 2020

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668- 71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Medina’s Complaint does not meet Rule 8’s pleading requirements.

Dasisa v. Howard University

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2010

MIHRETU BULTI DASISA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Naming Howard University Board of Education as the sole defendant, the complaint alleges that events occurring on or about 1998-99 gave rise to claims of discrimination under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972

United States v. Fairnot

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 2025

See United States v. Sanford, Ltd., 859 F. Supp. 2d 102, 107 (D.D.C. 2012); United States v. Bowdoin, 770 F. Supp. 2d 142, 146 (D.D.C. 2011). … United States v. King, 4 F. Supp. 3d 114, 124 (D.D.C. 2013) (citing United States v. Brown, 504 F.3d 99, 104 (D.C. Cir. 2007), and quoting District of Columbia v. Hunt, 163 F.2d 833, 837–38 (D.C.

Student Press Law Center v. Alexander

778 F. Supp. 1227 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 21, 1991

Board of Educ. v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 867 , 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2808 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982); see Kleindienst v. Mandel, 408 U.S. 753, 762-63 , 92 S.Ct. 2576, 2581-82 , 33 L.Ed.2d 683 (1972); Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. … In Board of Educ. v. Pico, the Court held that a local school board may not remove books from the library of a public school for the primary purpose of restricting students’ access to the ideas within the books.

Anderson v. USAA Casualty Insurance

218 F.R.D. 307 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2003

James V. Hurson Assocs., 229 F.3d at 283 ; Bowden v. United States, 176 F.3d 552 (D.C.Cir.1999); U.S. Info. Agency v. Krc, 905 F.2d 389, 399 (D.C.Cir. 1990). … , Gerald Costello, Mario Palumbo, and John Luciano (collectively, "the board members”).

Mitchell v. Saul

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2021

See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 709 (D.C. … See Pl.’s Mem. at 12; A.R. 25–26; see also Brown v.

Youssef v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

144 F. Supp. 3d 70 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2015

United States v. Valencia, 826 F.2d 169, 172 (2d Cir. 1987); accord Rosemann v. Roto–Die, Inc., 377 F.3d 897, 902 (8th Cir. 2004); United States v. … Specifically, Youssef would testify as to the role of career boards in the FBI promotional practice, the role of the chairman of the career board, and the procedures used by career boards. Id.

Shells v. Wal-Mart, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 6, 2023

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). … See, e.g., Brown v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. Feb. 5, 2016) (dismissing a complaint sua sponte for failing to comply with FRCP 8(a)); Hamrick v.

Kornegay v. AT & T

579 F. Supp. 2d 34 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2008

Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711, 716 , 103 S.Ct. 1478 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983)). … Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at Arms, 520 F.3d at 494 (citing St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks, 509 U.S. at 507-08, 511 , 113 S.Ct. 2742 ; U.S. Postal Service Board of Governors v.

Parker v. District of Columbia

832 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 29, 2011

Perdue v. Kenny A., 130 S. Ct. 1662, 1672 (2010); see also Blum v. … March 20, 2006) (disallowing the time that counsel spent correcting errors to a pleading that was previously filed); Brown v. Pro Football, 839 F. Supp. 905, 917 (D.D.C. 1993) (same).

Williams v. Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for Dc

110 F. Supp. 3d 111 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 23, 2015

The Board found that Mr. Williams was appropriately apprised of the job requirements he had not met and had adequate opportunity to show that he had performed adequately. Id. 6-10, 41-43. The Board rejected Mr. … The MSPB’s conclusion was supported by the large evidence before the Board. Id. at 4 (describing two-day MSPB hearing and Board orders thereafter leaving record open for the parties to submit still further evidence).

Cutchin v. District of Columbia

174 F. Supp. 3d 427 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2016

Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 71 (1989). … See City of Newport v.

Evans v. United States Patent and Trademark Office

238 F. Supp. 3d 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2017

Weaver v. USIA, 87 F.3d 1429, 1432 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 2302). … See Richards v. United States, 369 U.S. 1, 6 (1962). Like the CSRA, “[t]he FTCA bars claimants from bringing suit in federal court until they have exhausted their administrative remedies.” McNeil v.

Water & Sand International Capital, Ltd. v. Capacitive Deionization Technology Systems, Inc.

563 F. Supp. 2d 278 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2008

Barham v. UBS Fin. Servs., 496 F.Supp.2d 174, 176-77 (D.D.C.2007) (citing Stewart Org., Inc. v. … CDT's board of directors is full of individuals with extensive business experience. (See SEC Form 10-KSB/A (Apr. 14, 2006), Ex. 4 to Opp. to Mot. to Dismiss at 4-5.) 9 .