Case law

Stovall v. Veneman

394 F. Supp. 2d 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 24, 2005

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). Dismissal is only appropriate if it appears beyond doubt that no set of facts proffered in support of plaintiffs claim would entitle him to relief. … Brown v. United States, 389 F.3d 1296, 1297 (D.C.Cir.2004). Mr.

Attorney General of the British Virgin Islands

District Court, District of Columbia · May 23, 2020

SAS v. … See, e.g., LEG Q LLC V. RSR Corp., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140280, at *2-5 (N.D. Tex.

James Madison Project v. Central Intelligence Agency

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 2020

Clinic v. United States, 134 F. Supp. 3d 263, 275 (D.D.C. 2015). … DATE: September 23, 2020 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Slattery v. Costello

586 F. Supp. 162 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 1983

Schact v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343 (7th Cir.1983); Bennett v. Berg, 685 F.2d 1053, 1063 (8th Cir.1982), aff'd, en banc, 710 F.2d 1361 (8th Cir.1983); Hunt Int’l Resources Corp. v. … Accord, Schact v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343 (7th Cir.1983); Bennett v. Berg, 685 F.2d 1053, 1059 (8th Cir.1982), aff'd, en banc, 710 F.2d 1361 (8th Cir.1983); Crocker Nat’l Bank v.

Northern v. United States Health and Human Services

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 2025

D.D.C. 2011) (dismissing 140- page complaint because it was “prolix, redundant, [and] bloated with unnecessary detail,” falling far short of Rule 8(d)’s requirement that each allegation be “simple, concise, and direct”); Brown … v.

Thompson v. Kennickell

710 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 1989

The Government’s brief quoted from the Supreme Court’s seminal antitrust opinion in Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. … Defendant's Mem. at 14 (quoting Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 325 , 82 S.Ct. at 1523 ). 11 .

Fuller v. Harris

258 F. Supp. 3d 204 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2017

See Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (explaining pro se pleadings held to less stringent standards). II. … Reddy v. O’Connor, 520 F. Supp. 2d 124, 130 (D.D.C. 2007); see also Trackwell v. U.S. Gov’t, 472 F.3d 1242, 1247 (10th Cir. 2007) (same); Smith v.

Dickson v. United States

831 F. Supp. 893 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 1993

Id. at 1320 (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)). The Plaintiff provides no statutory support. … Block v. North Dakota, ex rel. Board of University and School Lands, 461 U.S. 273, 280 , 103 S.Ct. 1811, 1816 , 75 L.Ed.2d 840 (1983).

Woubetu v. People Who Go to Saint Mary's Church

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 2022

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v.

Nextel Spectrum Acquisition Corp. v. Hispanic Information & Telecommunications Network, Inc.

503 F. Supp. 2d 334 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 29, 2007

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 .

Carabillo v. Ullico, Inc.

357 F. Supp. 2d 249 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2004

Thompson v. Capitol Police Board, 120 F.Supp.2d 78, 81 (D.D.C.2000). … Board of Trustees of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees Local 25 v. Madison Hotel, 97 F.3d 1479, 1486 (D.C.Cir.1996).

In Re United Mine Workers of America Employee Benefit Plans Litigation

854 F. Supp. 914 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 7, 1994

The Second Circuit reached a contrary conclusion in an earlier Securities and Exchange Act ease, Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36, 40-41 (2d Cir.1993). … See Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d at 40-41 ; see also In re General Motors Class E Stock Buyout Securities Litigation, 696 F.Supp. at 1547 .

Day v. DC DEPT. OF CONSUMER

191 F. Supp. 2d 154 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2002

See Brown v. United States, 742 F.2d 1498 (D.C.Cir. 1984) (en banc). … See Brown, 742 F.2d at 1500 n. 2, 1509-10. C.

Luke v. United States

942 F. Supp. 2d 154 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 2, 2013

(citing Scolaro v. D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics, 104 F. Supp. 2d 18, 22 (D.D.C. 2000)). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). The motion does not test the plaintiff’s ultimate likelihood of success on the merits, but rather, whether the plaintiff has properly stated a claim. Scheuer v.

Bey v. U.S. Department of Justice

518 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2007

He also notes that “there exist video tapes of plaintiff and Tonya Brown Bey.” Id. … V 39.

Seiler v. United States

655 F. Supp. 452 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 1987

Harr v. … National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws v. Mullen, 608 F.Supp. 945 (N.D.Cal.1985).

Carr v. Sessions

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 2019

Because the Court must construe pro se complaints liberally, see Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 150–52 (D.C. Cir. 2015); Atherton v. D.C. Office of Mayor, 567 F.3d 672, 681 (D.C. … See Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 990 (6th Cir. 1989).

Stanley v. Duff

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 30, 2021

McNeil v. Harvey (“McNeil I”), No. 17-cv-1720, 2018 WL 4623571, at *4-7 (D.D.C. dismissed Sept. 26, 2018); McNeil v. … Watts v. SEC, 482 F.3d 501, 505 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (quoting Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 U.S. 574, 583 (1999)).

Miner v. District of Columbia

87 F. Supp. 3d 260 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 9, 2015

Allen-Brown v. District of Columbia, No. 13-1341, 2014 WL 3051021, at *4 (D.D.C. July 7, 2014) (quoting Coleman v. District of Columbia, 828 F. Supp. 2d 87, 91 (D.D.C. 2011)). … Allen-Brown, 2014 WL 3051021, at *5.

McBryde v. Committee to Review Circuit Council Conduct & Disability Orders of the Judicial Conference of the United States

83 F. Supp. 2d 135 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 1999

Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 467 , 100 S.Ct. 2286 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1979). In Mills v. … Id.; see also Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 461 , 100 S.Ct. 2286 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980). Nonetheless, even “core” protected speech is not immune from government regulation.