Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

5.99s

  • Bossier Parish School Board v. Reno

    157 F.R.D. 133 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 1994

    According to the Plaintiffs, an injunction is necessary because the prospective Interve-nors filed an interim redistricting plan for the Bossier Parish School Board with Judge John V. … whether to pre-clear the Bossier Parish School Board plan.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Camp v. Recreation Board for District of Columbia

    104 F. Supp. 10 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 10, 1952

    Further, the Court quoted from University of Maryland v. … Carr v. Corning (Browne Junior High School Parent-Teacher Association v. Magdeburger), 1950, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 178 , 182 F.2d 14 . 4 . 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 41 , 43. 5 . 59 Stat. 1035 et seq. 6 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lester v. Board of Elections for District of Columbia

    319 F. Supp. 505 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 1970

    Evans v. Cornman, 398 U.S. 419 , 90 S.Ct. 1752 , 26 L.Ed.2d 370 (1970); City of Phoenix, Ariz. v. … Thus this election is not local in the sense the school board election is local. The Court must take notice of the explosion in mass communication undreamed of fifty years ago.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Achagzai v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 20, 2018

    (citing Bombard v. … does not qualify as an adverse employment action” for purposes of a discrimination or retaliation claim); Peyus v. Lahood, 919 F. Supp. 2d 93, 101–02 (D.D.C. 2013) (same); Brown v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Government of the District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2017

    Brown, 115 F. Supp. 3d at 65 n.2 (citing Defs.’ Suppl. Filing, Simms v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 12–cv–00701, at *2 (D.D.C. June 22, 2012)). … See, e.g., Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 146 F.R.D. 1, 5 (D.D.C. 1992) (noting that plaintiffs relied on a “simple, common formula” to measure damages for each class member); see also Windham v. Am.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Protect the Public's Trust v. National Labor Relations Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2026

    In 2015, the Board set forth its view of the appropriate joint employer standard in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., d/b/a BFI Newby Island Recyclery, 362 NLRB 1599 (2015). … However, “[i]n December 2017, after a change in the Board’s composition, the new Board majority issued a decision overruling Browning-Ferris and (. . . continued) Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment and Response in Opposition

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sherven v. Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 2023

    ) Case No. 22-cv-2412 (APM) PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES ) OVERSIGHT BOARD, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________ … Wilbur v. Cent. Intel. Agency, 355 F.3d 675, 676 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (internal quotation marks omitted). Here, Plaintiff received a final determination on his FOIA request on August 8, 2022. Compl., ECF No. 1, at 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ocasio v. Merit Systems Protection Board

    244 F. Supp. 3d 12 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 23, 2017

    P. 56(a); see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247–48 (1986); Holcomb v. Powell, 433 F.3d 889, 895 (D.C. Cir. 2006). … Wilbur v. C.I.A., 355 F.3d 675, 678 (D.C. Cir. 2004); see also Yeager v. Drug Enforcement Admin., 678 F.2d 315, 321 (D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Estate of Anthony K. Brown v. Islamic Republic of Iran

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 3, 2012

    BROWN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) 08-cv-531 … Brown v. Islamic Republic of Iran, No. 08-cv-531 (D.D.C. Feb. 1, 2010), ECF No. 30 (citing Peterson, 264 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.D.C. 2003) (Peterson I)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stevens v. Board of Education of Kent County

    70 F. Supp. 3d 566 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 8, 2014

    Ba’. of Ea’uc., 346 Md. 633, 635 n.l (1997) ("The various county boards of education are State agencies."); Board v. … Because the Board is a state agent entitled to sovereign immunity and Stevens h demonstrated a waiver of immunity, the Court must grant the Board’s motion to dismiss. V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

    432 F.2d 1341 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 1970

    When the dispute came before the National Labor Relations Board, the Board found that the company had failed to bargain in good faith. … Porter Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 397 U.S. 99 , 90 S.Ct 821 , 25 L.Ed.2d 146 (1970), certainly precludes a Board order requiring that the company agree to the checkoff provision.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Flight Engineers' International Ass'n v. National Mediation Board

    230 F. Supp. 611 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 20, 1964

    In Ruby v. … This Court is also of the opinion that the Board has complied with the dictum in F. E. I. A. v. C. A. B., supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Greer v. Board of Trustees University of District of Columbia

    113 F. Supp. 3d 297 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 10, 2015

    ) Civil Action No. 13-cv-1728 (TSC) ) BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE ) UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • Mahoney v. United States Capitol Police Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 2022

    Mahoney’s related suits against Defendants United States Capitol Police Board and certain individuals associated with the Board. … Cimino v. Int’l Bus. Machines Corp., 3 F.4th 412, 424 (D.C. Cir. 2021) (quoting Kowal v. MCI Commc’ns Corp., 16 F.3d 1271, 1279 n.3 (D.C. Cir. 1994)); see also, e.g., Mann v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Protect the Public's Trust v. National Labor Relations Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 29, 2025

    Wilcox, Board Member, and David M. Prouty, Board Member, re: Service Employees International Union v. … Dep’t of Just. v. Reps.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • King v. Dole

    595 F. Supp. 1140 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 23, 1984

    In Brown v. … Brown v. Nat'l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 673 F.2d 544, 546 (D.C. Cir.1982).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Mahoney v. United States Capitol Police Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 2022

    Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008). … McCarthy v. Pelosi, 5 F.4th 34, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2021), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 897 (2022) (quoting Kilbourn v. Thompson, 103 U.S. 168, 204 (1880)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hannam Chain USA, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 17, 2025

    Co. v. NLRB, 114 F.4th 519, 531 (6th Cir. 2024), cert. denied, 145 S. Ct. 1429 (2025); NLRB v. Aakash, Inc., 58 F.4th 1099, 1104–06 (9th Cir. 2023); Exela Enter. Sols., Inc. v. … Indeed, in Axon Enterprise v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Parts Depot, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    24 F. App'x 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2001

    Based on its findings, the Board determined that a Category II bargaining order *2 was justified under NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969). … The bargaining order remedy imposed by the Board was therefore fully justified.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • John Doe Corporation v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 2025

    Analysis This is not the first time a plaintiff has sought to proceed pseudonymously in this type of suit against the Board. In fact, in Doe v. … See Bird v. Barr, 2019 WL 2870234, at *5 (D.D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.