Case law

Senior Executives Ass'n v. United States

576 F. Supp. 1207 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1983

In AFGE v. … See also Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 601 , 92 S.Ct. 2694, 2699 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972). 23 .

United States Ex Rel. Siewick v. Jamieson Science & Engineering, Inc.

191 F. Supp. 2d 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 2002

United States v. … See Residential Warranty Corp. v.

Rosier v. Holder

833 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2011

v. … Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C.Cir.1985) (citations omitted).

U.S. Leasing Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.

825 F. Supp. 336 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 8, 1993

RTC v. Mustang Partners, 946 F.2d 103 (10th Cir.1991). … "FSLIC owned all of FADA’s stock, selected FADÁ’s board of directors, and sent a representative to all FADA’s board meetings.” Id. at 1202 .

Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees v. Ass'n of American Railroads

639 F. Supp. 220 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 25, 1986

Co. v. … In Railway Clerks v.

Jenkins v. Washington Convention Center

59 F. Supp. 2d 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 12, 1999

See Silverman v. … (“Board of Tax Appeals”) from suits at law.

Antonelli v. United States Parole Commission

619 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 29, 2009

See Perry v. … .”); accord Boyd v. Criminal Div. of U.S.

Nader v. Baroody

396 F. Supp. 1231 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 23, 1975

United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 3090 , 41 L. Ed.2d 1039 (1974); Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52, 131, 164 , 47 S.Ct. 21 , 71 L.Ed. 160 (1926): Soucie v. … The Supreme Court in United States v.

Bond Hospitals, Inc. v. Heckler

587 F. Supp. 1268 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 16, 1984

. § 1395f(b)(l), and HCA appealed this adverse determination to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (“PRRB” or “Board”). 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(a); 42 C.F.R. § 405.1837 . … On October 8, 1982, the Secretary reversed the decision of the Board.

Akinseye v. District of Columbia

193 F. Supp. 2d 134 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2002

. v. … Citing King v. Floyd County Board of Education, 228 F.3d 622 , 627 (6th Cir. 2000)(30 days); Powers v. Indiana Dep’t of Educ., 61 F.3d 552, 557 (7th Cir.1995) (30 days); Rosemary B. v.

Taylor v. Resolution Trust Corp.

973 F. Supp. 178 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 13, 1997

Board of County Commissioners v. Umbehr, — U.S. -, -, 116 S.Ct. 2342, 2347-48 , 135 L.Ed.2d 843 (1996). … See Board of County Comm’rs, — U.S. at-, 116 S.Ct. at 2347 ; Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734-35 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968).

Linsey v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.

675 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 23, 1987

Lynn Brown, Presiding Bishop of the Ninth Episcopal District, to negotiate for the First CME Church of Anchorage, Alaska in the Nathaniel L. Linsey vs E.F. Hutton litigation. … See, e.g., Superintendent of Insurance v.

Patterson v. Florida Department of Children and Families

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 2023

See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). … See Achagzai v. Broad. Bd. of Governors, 170 F.

Shell Oil Co. v. Kreps

445 F. Supp. 1128 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 6, 1978

E. g., Fusari v. Steinberg, 419 U.S. 379, 389 , 95 S.Ct. 533 , 42 L.Ed.2d 521 (1975); Board of Regents v. Roth, [ 408 U.S. 564 , 570-71 & n.8, 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)]; Morrissey v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Bowyer v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 14, 2009

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949-1950 (2009); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). “[A] complaint needs some information about the circumstances giving rise to the claims.” … Gustave-Schmidt v. Chao, 226 F.

Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc. v. Squire Sanders & Dempsey LLP (In Re Kaiser Group International, Inc.)

421 B.R. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 9, 2009

Corp. v. … In Browning v.

Riggs Nat. Bank of Washington DC v. Allbritton

516 F. Supp. 164 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 1981

TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc., 426 U.S. 438, 449 , 96 S.Ct. 2126, 2132 , 48 L.Ed.2d 757 (1976), as applied to Section 14(e) in Seaboard World Airlines, Inc. v. … Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp., 409 F.2d 937, 948 (2d Cir. 1969), cited in Susquehanna Corp. v. Pan American Sulphur Co., 423 F.2d 1075, 1085 (5th Cir. 1970).

Hutchinson v. Holder

815 F. Supp. 2d 303 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 3, 2011

Stewart v. Evans, 275 F.3d 1126, 1134 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999)); see also Walker v. WMATA, 102 F. … Ohal v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Dist. of Columbia, 100 Fed. Appx. 833, 834 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (citing Stewart, 352 F.3d 422).

United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

783 F. Supp. 2d 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2011

First, many of BATCo’s statements and policies at issue in this case concerned U.S. subsidiary/affiliate Brown & Williamson and potential litigation in the United States. … Corp. v.

Switzer v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 13, 2022

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). Pleadings filed by pro se litigants are held to “less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Haines v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. Feb. 5, 2016) (dismissing a complaint sua sponte for failing to comply with Rule 8(a)); Hamrick v.