Case law

United States v. Accrocco

297 F. Supp. 966 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 1969

See Standard Oil Company v. Brown, 218 U.S. 78 , 30 S.Ct. 669 , 54 L.Ed. 939 (1910). See also Dean v. H. Koppers Co., 49 App.D.C. 230 , 263 F. 626 (1920); French v. National Laundry Co., 31 App.D.C. 105 (1908). 5. … Porello v. United States, 94 F.Supp. 952 (S.D.N.Y.1950). See also A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi v.

Expressway Const. v. WASH. METRO. A. TRANSIT AUTH.

676 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 23, 1987

See General Railway Signal Company v. WMATA, 527 F.Supp. 359, 360 (D.D.C.), aff'd, 664 F.2d 296 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 915 , 101 S.Ct. 3049 , 69 L.Ed.2d 418 (1981); Granite-Groves v. … Nothing in the Contract, however, shall be construed as making final the decisions of the Board of Directors or its representative on a question of law."

Tumblin v. Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 10, 2022

See Rotational Board Final Decision at 2. … See Rotational Board Final Decision at 2. A score of sixty would not have changed her seventh-place ranking. See id.

Daniels v. Chugach Government Services, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 18, 2019

CGSI posted the opening on the Chugach Job Board. Id. ¶ 28. At the time of the posting, Mr. Daniels was aware of how to check the Chugach Job Board and had access to the Job Board. Id. ¶ 30. Mr. … Baker v.

United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

524 F. Supp. 1381 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 1981

With regard to the questions to be posed to the members of Federal-State Joint Board established by the FCC in Docket No. 19528, a distinction may appropriately be drawn between the members of the board who were FCC Commissioners … However, no such requirement will be imposed on those members of the board who were FCC Commissioners.

Mta v. Ctia

929 F. Supp. 473 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 1996

Starting in April, 1995, plaintiffs offered subscribers to the WirelessNOW service access to an electronic bulletin board containing wireless industry news, data and information. … Bulletin board services are dial-in computer services which may or may not be linked to the Internet.

Stewart v. United States Department of Agriculture

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2024

Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1022 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (citation omitted). … Chambers, 35 F.4th at 875 (“Brown’s approach is clearly mistaken.”). Because Chambers overruled Brown, it is binding D.C. Circuit precedent that Chambers applies to § 2000e-16. See Cameron v.

United States v. Washington

782 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2011

Brown v. Cameron, 353 F.2d 835, 836, n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1965). … See Hodges v.

W. C. & A. N. Miller Development Co. v. Emig Properties Corp.

134 F.2d 36 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 1943

E. g., Carter v. Wroten, 1938, 187 S.C. 432 , 198 S.E. 13 , 119 A.L.R. 379 ; Morrill v. Lovett, 1901, 95 Me. 165 , 49 A. 666 , 56 L.R.A. 634 ; Scott v. Brown, 1894, 106 Ala. 604 , 17 So. 731 ; cf. New Orleans v. … Board of Review of Jo Daviess County, 1902, 200 Ill. 116 , 65 N.E. 711 ; Frye v. Burke, 1936, 57 Ohio App. 99 , 12 N. E.2d 152, 158 ; Ceepeear School District v. Security Trust Co., [1919] 1 West. Week. Rep. 615.

Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Mukasey

573 F. Supp. 2d 221 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 4, 2008

In the first case, Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. … And in Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v.

Herndon v. State of Texas

District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 2021

Found., Inc. v. Potter, 586 F.3d 1, 4 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (citing Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194 (1993)); see also Am. Airways Charters, Inc. v. Regan, 746 F.2d 865, 873 n.14 (D.C. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Rogers v. Voltron Data, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 2024

“Patterson regularly told Rogers that she was one of the best hires he had made at the company,” id. ¶ 17, and informed her that “the Board had praised her background and work,” id. ¶ 20. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Taylor v. Reilly

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2010

See Franklin v. District of Columbia, 163 F.3d 625, 632 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (acknowledging new law transferring parole authority from the former D.C. Board of Parole); Sellmon v. Reilly, 551 F. … See Sellmon v. Reilly, 551 F.

Banks v. Smith

377 F. Supp. 2d 92 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2005

In Garris , the prisoner attacked the conviction; while in Maddox and Blair-Bey , the prisoners attacked the actions of a parole board. … See Piercy v. Black, 801 F.2d 1075 (8th Cir.1986); Sarzen v. Gaughan, 489 F.2d 1076 (1st Cir.1973); Layton v. Carson, 479 F.2d 1275 (5th Cir.1973).

Adams v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Headquarters

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 2017

Evans v. Suter, No. 09-5242, 2010 WL 1632902, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 2, 2010). … Although I am mindful that complaints filed by pro se litigants are subject to a less demanding standard than pleadings filed by lawyers, Brown v. Dist. of Columbz'a, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C.

Salt Lake Community Action Program, Inc. v. Sullivan

785 F. Supp. 1013 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 13, 1992

Alternatively, plaintiff requests a remand to the agency for a fuller hearing on the issues than was accorded by the HHS Departmental Appeals Board. The preliminary injunction has been fully briefed and argued. … See East Arkansas Legal Services v.

Lee v. Joongangilbo USA, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 13, 2026

See Inst. for Pol’y Stud. v. … Leasing Corp. v.

Gasplus, L.L.C. v. United States Department of Interior

466 F. Supp. 2d 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 8, 2006

over any appeal before the Board and render a. final decision, see 43 C.F.R. § 4.5 . … Council v. Babbitt, 1 F.3d 1052 , 1054-55 (10th Cir.1993) (holding that the Board’s- denial of an appeal from the decision of an Area Director was “agency action” reviewable under the APA).

Minter v. Delmastro

District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 2021

Found., Inc. v. Potter, 586 F.3d 1, 4 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (citing Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194 (1993)); see also Am. Airways Charters, Inc. v. Regan, 746 F.2d 865, 873 n.14 (D.C. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Bimini Superfast Operations LLC v. Winkowski

994 F. Supp. 2d 106 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 2014

In Bennett v. … See Bowen v.