Case law

Charles v. Brennan

174 F. Supp. 3d 97 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2016

Kowal v. MCI Commc’ns Corp., 16 F.3d 1271, 1276 (D.C.Cir.1994). … See Rann v.

United States v. Taylor

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 10, 2020

ECF No. 147-1 (Notice) at 2 (Brown’s counsel noting “concern” that trial participants will contract virus). … See Hakeem v.

Eley v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 2014

In Lunceford v. District of Columbia Board of Education, 745 F.2d 1577, 1579 (D.C. … Circuits opinions in Concerned Parents and Lunceford, the Seventh Circuit in Board of Education of Community High School District Number 218, Cook County, Illinois v.

Petitfere v. Austin

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2023

Accardi v. Shaughnessy, 347 U.S. 260 (1954); Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363 (1957). … Though the DHA appeals board ultimately disagreed with Lt.

Baloch v. Norton

517 F. Supp. 2d 345 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2007

The Early Years (1991-2000) The plaintiff is a “brown-skinned” Muslim from Pakistan and over seventy years old. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999). The plaintiff never denies that all his sick leave was approved. Def.’s Reply at 10.

Horton v. U.S. Parole Commission

656 F. Supp. 2d 111 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 21, 2009

See Ellis v. District of Columbia, 84 F.3d 1413, 1415-20 (D.C.Cir.1996); accord Blair-Bey v. Quick, 151 F.3d 1036, 1047 (D.C.Cir.1998); Brandon v. D.C. Board of Parole, 823 F.2d 644, 648 (D.C.Cir.1987). … Carrington v.

Herndon v. State of Texas

District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 2021

Found., Inc. v. Potter, 586 F.3d 1, 4 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (citing Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194 (1993)); see also Am. Airways Charters, Inc. v. Regan, 746 F.2d 865, 873 n.14 (D.C. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

United States v. Thompson

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 3, 2026

As the government’s arguments are persuasive across the board, defendant’s motion to suppress is denied. A. … In United States v.

Rem-Cru Titanium, Inc. v. Watson

147 F. Supp. 915 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 1956

These rejections were affirmed, by the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office. … In Becket v.

Penland v. Mabus

643 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 7, 2009

See Rooney v. … See Guerra v.

Russel - Murray Hospice, Inc. v. Sebelius

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 20, 2010

on the plaintiff’s behalf, as such an action [was] not a ‘final decision’ of the Board”); Arcadia Valley Hosp. v. … Larson v.

Minter v. Delmastro

District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 2021

Found., Inc. v. Potter, 586 F.3d 1, 4 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (citing Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194 (1993)); see also Am. Airways Charters, Inc. v. Regan, 746 F.2d 865, 873 n.14 (D.C. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Ferebee v. George Washington Hospital

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 4, 2017

See Haz`nes v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … v.

Lilly v. Schwartz

713 F. Supp. 2d 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 2010

Assuming that plaintiff had a property interest in his employment, a point uncontested by the parties, see Board of Regents v. … See Tabb v. District of Columbia, 605 F.Supp.2d at 97 (quoting Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 546 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985)).

United States v. Washington

782 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2011

Brown v. Cameron, 353 F.2d 835, 836, n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1965). … See Hodges v.

United States v. North

708 F. Supp. 364 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 10, 1988

See also, United States v. Browning, 572 F.2d 720, 722-25 (10th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 822 , 99 S.Ct. 88 , 58 L.Ed.2d 114 . … United States v. Browning, 572 F.2d at 724 . North was apparently summoned on a Sunday by the Attorney General himself to the Department of Justice in the face of rising, well-publicized public concern.

Taseko Mines Limited v. Raging River Capital Lp

185 F. Supp. 3d 87 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2016

Shareholders voting on the basis of inadequate disclosures may significantly affect who wins several director positions, and indeed control of the Board of Directors. … Graphic Sciences, Inc. v. Int'l Mogul Mines Ltd., 397 F.

Andrade v. General Services Administration

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 5, 2024

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Brown v Whole Foods Market Group, Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151–52 4 (D.C.

Bourbeau v. Jonathan Woodner Co.

549 F. Supp. 2d 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 17, 2008

Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d 1271, 1276 (D.C.Cir.1994); see also Brown *84 ing v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002); Sparrow v. United Air Lines, Inc., 216 F.3d 1111, 1113 (D.C.Cir.2000). … See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276 ; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d at 242 . III. DISCUSSION A.

W. C. & A. N. Miller Development Co. v. Emig Properties Corp.

134 F.2d 36 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 1943

E. g., Carter v. Wroten, 1938, 187 S.C. 432 , 198 S.E. 13 , 119 A.L.R. 379 ; Morrill v. Lovett, 1901, 95 Me. 165 , 49 A. 666 , 56 L.R.A. 634 ; Scott v. Brown, 1894, 106 Ala. 604 , 17 So. 731 ; cf. New Orleans v. … Board of Review of Jo Daviess County, 1902, 200 Ill. 116 , 65 N.E. 711 ; Frye v. Burke, 1936, 57 Ohio App. 99 , 12 N. E.2d 152, 158 ; Ceepeear School District v. Security Trust Co., [1919] 1 West. Week. Rep. 615.