Case law

Phillips v. Corrections Corp. of America

407 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 2005

See McKinney v. Board of Trustees of Mayland Community College, 955 F.2d 924 , 928 (4th Cir.1992); see also Russell v. LJA Trucking Inc., 2001 WL 527411 , at * 1-2 (E.D.N.Y. … E.g., Brierly v.

Thomas v. Potomac Electric Power Company

266 F. Supp. 687 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 18, 1967

The operation of the swimming pool was divided between the Recreation Board of the District of Columbia, and the National Capital Parks. … In O’Connor v.

Grynberg v. Bp P.L.C.

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 9, 2009

Brown v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, 267 F.Supp.2d 61, 67 (D.D.C. 2003) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Par-Knit Mills, Inc. v. Stockbridge Fabrics Co., 636 F.2d 51, 54 & n.9 (3d Cir. 1980). … See Scherk v. Alberto- 2 See, e.g., Richards v.

Wilks v. Apfel

113 F. Supp. 2d 30 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 2000

Richardson, 402 U.S. at 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. N.L.R.B., 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938)); Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 705 (D.C.Cir.1986). … See Simms v. Sullivan, 877 F.2d 1047, 1049 (D.C.Cir.1989); Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d at 705-06 .

L. P. Steuart & Bro., Inc. v. Bowles

55 F. Supp. 336 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 21, 1944

Simon Hardware Co. v. … I agree in general with the reasoning of the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Fifth Circuit in its opinion recently handed down in the case of Brown, Adm’r v. Wilemon et al., 139 F.2d 730 .

Slinski v. Bank of America, N.A.

981 F. Supp. 2d 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2013

See Warren, 353 F.3d at 39; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … (quoting Sere v. Grp. Hospitalization, Inc., 443 A.2d 33, 37 (D.C. 1982)), in which case the claim for breach “merges with” that tort, and punitive damages are allowed, Sere, 443 A.2d at 37 (quoting Brown v.

Wonders v. Department of the Army Office of the General Counsel

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 11, 2024

See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007); cf. Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). He must still, however, comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Amiri v. … free discussion 3 See DoD 5200.2-R at App’x 8, Dep’t of Defense Personnel Security Program (Jan. 1987, reissued incorporating changes Feb. 23, 1996); see also Central Clearance Facility, Personnel Security Appeals Board

Mahoney v. Donovan

824 F. Supp. 2d 49 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 14, 2011

See, e.g., Brown v. Mills, 674 F.Supp.2d 182, 192-93 (D.D.C.2009) (verbal reprimand instructing plaintiff to follow procedures not materially adverse). … Meese v.

McMillan v. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 29, 2019

Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987) (citing Redwood v. Council of the Dist. of Columbia, 679 F.2d 931 (D.C. Cir. 1982); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972)). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977) (citation omitted). Plaintiff’s Complaint does not meet the Rule 8 pleading standard.

United States v. United States

417 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 1976

Nat'l Small Shipments Traffic Conf. v. … Bd. v. CISC, Em.App., 522 F.2d 637, 640 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976); United States v.

Stewart v. United States Postal Service

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 15, 2021

In her Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, facts of which the Court also accepts as true, see Brown v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 561 (1992); U.S. Ecology, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, 231 F.3d 20, 24 (D.C. Cir. 2000).

Allen v. Barram

215 F. Supp. 2d 184 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 23, 2002

Hayes v. Shalala, 933 F.Supp. 21, 24 (D.D.C.1996); Underwood v. District of Columbia Armory Board, 1992 WL 36545 * 3 (D.D.C. Feb. 10, 1992); Jones v. … See also Doll v. Brown, 75 F.3d 1200, 1204 (7th Cir.l996)(“No one has a right to occupy a position that he obtained as a result of unlawful discrimination, even if he himself was not complicit in the discrimination.”).

United States v. Kelly

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 25, 2024

United States v. Brown, 857 F.3d 403, 405 (D.C. Cir. 2017). Mr. … Thus, the Court has already articulated adequate case-specific reasons to impose an above-Guidelines sentence, as Brown requires.

MobilizeGreen, Inc. v. Community Foundation for the National Capital Region

101 F. Supp. 3d 36 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 29, 2015

• Count III: Negligence (All Defendants) • Count IV: Breach of Contract (Defendant Community Foundation) • Count V: Defamation (Defendant Brown) • Count … See Mulcahey v.

Stea v. Stea

83 F. Supp. 625 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 1949

On November 17, 1942, this court “awarded a judgment of legal separation from bed and board,” in the above case. … There is no provision in the statute which permits the application of the doctrine of revival after condonation prior to institution of suit, Holt v.

Washington v. Levy Food Service

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 2019

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007); see also Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 286 (1986). … .; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Having considered plaintiff’s complaint and all her subsequent submissions, see Brown v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 150 (D.C.

Magowan v. Lowery

166 F. Supp. 3d 39 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 29, 2016

[a defendant’s] motion to dismiss,” must be considered in construing the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s claims, Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015); see also id. … See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Vasaturo v. Peterka

177 F. Supp. 3d 509 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 11, 2016

Brown v. Whole Foods Market, 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). III. … Bush v. Butler, 521 F. Supp. 2d 63, 68-69 (D.D.C. 2007); see also, e.g., Mattiaccio v. DHA Group, Inc., 20 F.

Kaiser Group International, Inc v. World Bank

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2010

The IBRD and the IFC each have their own Board of Directors, but the Executive Directors on these Boards are generally the same people. … Transamerica Leasing, 200 F.3d at 849, quoted in Doe I v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 573 F. Supp. 2d 16, 31 (D.D.C. 2008) (emphasis added); see also United States v.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Federal Election Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2025

For example, in Cadillac of Naperville v. NLRB, 14 F.4th 703 (D.C. Cir. 2021), the National Labor Relations Board decided a case under one legal standard. Id. at 719. Then, after the employer appealed to the D.C. … the Board had already applied the Board’s new test.