Case law

Charles v. Brennan

174 F. Supp. 3d 97 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2016

Kowal v. MCI Commc’ns Corp., 16 F.3d 1271, 1276 (D.C.Cir.1994). … See Rann v.

Lacy v. Reynolds

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 12, 2023

Supp. 3d 462, 464 (D.D.C. 2017); Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). … See generally Goodyear Dun- lop Tires Ops, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). A court has general jurisdiction—juris- diction for all purposes—over a defendant in the forum where she is “at home.”

Fraternal Order of Police, D.C. v. Rubin

134 F. Supp. 2d 39 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 2001

Brown at 35 (“Brown Dep.”) & Saliunas Decl. ¶ 2. … Cf The Wackenhut Corp. v.

Network Project v. Corporation for Public Broadcasting

398 F. Supp. 1332 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 23, 1975

James v. … In Spomer v.

Kinard v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 2020

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, a prisoner at Allenwood Federal Correctional Institution, located in White Deer, Pennsylvania, sues the President of the United States, the U.S.

Federal Trade Commission v. Anderson

442 F. Supp. 1118 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 1977

Browning, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 292, 298-300 , 435 F.2d 96, 102-04 (1970). … See FTC v. Browning, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 298 -300, 435 F.2d 96, 102-04 (1970).

Pitts v. Meese

684 F. Supp. 303 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 1987

or pursuant to standards followed by that board. … Montanye v. Haymes, supra and Meachum v. Fano, supra.

Cunningham v. Does

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2019

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). “A confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr. Corp., 71 F.

Fields v. Smith

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 4, 2016

Rumsfeld v. … (quoting Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547, 563 (1892)); see also Rothgery v.

Galante v. Quigg

696 F. Supp. 677 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 1988

I Plaintiff brought this action to review an adverse decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences based upon 35 U.S.C. § 145 , and requested a trial by jury. … See Tompkins v. Quigg, Civil Action No. 87-1313 (D.D.C. Oct. 2, 1987) (Oberdorfer, J.) [available on WESTLAW, 1987 WL 14778 ]; Boyd v. Quigg, Civil Action No. 87-1647 (D.D.C.

C.S. Lawn & Landscape, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Labor

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2026

See Morton v. … Austin v. United States, 509 U.S. 602, 609–10 (1993) (quoting Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vt., Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S. 257, 265 (1989)).

United States v. Deft. 3

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 2023

Board, No. 91-cr-559-11 (TFH), ECF No. 2331, at 8-9; United States v. Wyche, Case No. 89-cr- 36-RCL-S, 2023 WL 130825, at *1 (D.D.C. Jan. 9, 2023). … Hogan reduced Williams-Davis’s and Board’s original life sentences to approximately 30 years and 28 years, respectively. See Order, Williams-Davis, ECF No. 2376; Order, Board, ECF No. 2344.

Artis v. Greenspan

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2009

See Artis v. Greenspan, 474 F. Supp. 2d 16 (D.D.C. 2007); Artis v. Greenspan, 223 F. Supp. 2d 149 (D.D.C. 2002). … See Fund for Animals v. Norton, 326 F.

Boland v. Providence Construction Corp.

304 F.R.D. 31 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 29, 2014

See, e.g., Boland v. Shoun-Allen Masonry, Inc., No. 13-cv-0086, Order Granting Default J., ECF No. 7 (D.D.C. May 7, 2013); Flynn v. … Date: May 29, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States

Association of American Railroads v. Department of Transportation

865 F. Supp. 2d 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 2012

Of the nine directors who sit on Amtrak’s board, eight are directly appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate. See 49 U.S.C. § 24302. The ninth board member is selected by the other eight. … In addition, § 213(a) of the PRIIA empowers the Surface Transportation Board (STB), “a quasi-independent three-member body within the Department of Transportation,” Iowa, Chicago & Eastern R.R. Corp. v.

Byrd v. Metropolitan Police Department, Dc

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 13, 2016

Price v. Phoenix Home Life Mut., 203 F.3d 53 (D.C. Cir. 1999). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

American Hospital Association v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 2019

See Medicare Board of Trustees, 2018 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Funds 181 (2018), available at https://go.cms.gov/2m5ZCok. … Ct. at 2483 (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000)); see also Util. Air Regulatory Grp., 573 U.S. at 320.

Taye v. Amundson

908 F. Supp. 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 1995

See Anderson v. … Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 148 n. 1, 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 1723 n. 1, 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (presuming that the right-to-sue letter was received three days after issuance and mailing); Hunter v.

Taseko Mines Limited v. Raging River Capital Lp

185 F. Supp. 3d 87 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2016

Shareholders voting on the basis of inadequate disclosures may significantly affect who wins several director positions, and indeed control of the Board of Directors. … Graphic Sciences, Inc. v. Int'l Mogul Mines Ltd., 397 F.

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Capitol Police

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 3, 2021

Plaintiff requested (1) email communications between the USCP Executive Team and the Capitol Police Board concerning the security of the Capitol on January 6, 2021; (2) email communications between the Capitol Police Board … Jeffries v. Barr, 965 F.3d 843, 855 (D.C. Cir. 2020) (quoting Convertino v. DOJ, 684 F.3d 93, 99–100 (D.C. Cir. 2012)) (alterations in original).